2017年4月8日 星期六

--[26-10-2017](Hong Kong TV) {Chen Zhanpeng - Ruco Chan} to see the story of life, encourage - people wake up to see so diverse theme, very moved! Worthy of praise![08/04/2017]Update -see the nice guy "NowThis" push this msg on the twitter My tears is following down, sadly... (( #WhatTheFuckingNaziTrumpdidb4 #NoWar #NoBanNoWall #HumanRights #Anonymous #ObamaAgain ))-Update[20/03/2017]Hong Kong ppls wants a “Head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”=“Mother wrote a letter to the for *Zeng Junhu*- oneof specifically Leader ” with the HK citizen to have a *political dreams*...~"- see these 2days what happen in the Google news & twitter, and apple daily news :"Trump once refused to shake hands embarrassing Merkel visited the United States was cold to be"-the fact !!! #FuckTrump--"Today, Poland tomorrow, USA" Scholars warn that populism can erode democracy - from ( hk.apple.nextmedia.com ) - you can see that why i very like this media, it's show the truth!~Update [15-03-2017] accumulation in Google Great God's favorite page - Apple Daily wonderful article, not a long time to teach my blog back, after all, also to my dear 'Google Great God' homes lay down my heart the most painful sour a feeling of. 'Li Yi' Mr. meaningful article, 'Mr. Li Ping' realistic comments, Apple Daily is the Oriental conscience newspaper, as we 'Great America' New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNNews, MSNews. & BBCNews. - Do not forget 'conscience and morality' so that we recognize black and white and authenticity. so, #FuckTrump , #NotMyPresident , #fuckrussia , #LiArPotusTrump , #TheResistance, ...."I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, What your #FuckingLies , #FuckTrump ! #Amonymous , #AnonFamily .-Update[13/01-2017 ]-From twitter: "Talia"-At least 50 Trump electors were not eligible to be electors. (304-50=254) Not enough, Donald!'' and from ''washingtonpost.com/news''-Meryl Streep was right. Donald Trump did mock a disabled reporter.[By Callum Borchers January 9]- and from "dailykos.com"- " Here Were McConnell's Requirements For Obama's Nominees.[By pollwatcher,Sunday Jan 08, 2017]- and from "http://hacker-bot.tumblr.com/post"-"Trump is way off on Russia hack report: Max Boot"="His reaction suggests a guilty conscience and the possibility that something sinister is going on." #FuckTrump ,, #YouNotMyPresident ,, #Fuck_KKK ,, #FuckPutin ,,





W 
Who is the Who is the Idol,...sometimes we see that the H.K (Hong Kong TV) {Chen Zhanpeng - Ruco Chan} to see the story of life, encourage - people wake up to see so diverse theme, very moved!
= Worthy of praise!
(香港電視 ){陳展鵬- Ruco Chan}看到的人生故事,鼓勵-發人心醒,看到那麼多元化的題材,極為感動!
值得讚許! 
what is google can not search?! no, + He is a Super toolbarin the world! 

 Too long time not here, cause i have a sick , it's make me cant sleep ...every week, every week, a log-time i dont how to live...so down to face my life, every day through the sad, or very fortunate to have such a TV repertoire to encourage me to continue to survive .. 
Thank you!  




/%E9%99%B3%E5%B1%95%E9%B5%AC_



*-[08/04/2017]Update -see the nice guy "NowThis" push this msg on the twitter
My tears is following down, sadly...
((  #WhatTheFuckingNaziTrumpdidb4
#NoWar
#NoBanNoWall
#HumanRights
#Anonymous
#ObamaAgain  ))-
-Update[20/03/2017]Hong Kong ppls wants a “Head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”=“Mother wrote a letter to the for *Zeng Junhu*- oneof specifically Leader ” with the HK citizen to have a *political dreams*...~"


-see these 2days what happen in the


Google news & twitter, and apple daily news :"Trump once refused to shake hands embarrassing Merkel visited the United States was cold to be"-the fact !!! #FuckTrump-
"Today, Poland tomorrow, USA"
Scholars warn that populism can erode democracy - from
 ( hk.apple.nextmedia.com ) - you can see that why i very like this media, it's show the truth!~

-Update [15-03-2017] accumulation in Google Great God's favorite page - Apple Daily wonderful article, not a long time to teach my blog back, after all, also to my dear 'Google Great God' homes lay down my heart the most painful sour a feeling of. 'Li Yi' Mr. meaningful article, 'Mr. Li Ping' realistic comments, Apple Daily is the Oriental conscience newspaper, as we 'Great America' New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNNews, MSNews. & BBCNews. - Do not forget 'conscience and morality' so that we recognize black and white and authenticity.
so,  #FuckTrump ,  #NotMyPresident ,  #fuckrussia , #LiArPotusTrump ,  #TheResistance, ...."I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, What your  #FuckingLies ,  #FuckTrump !  #Amonymous ,  #AnonFamily  .

-Update[13/01-2017 ]-From twitter: "Talia"-At least 50 Trump electors were not eligible to be electors. (304-50=254) Not enough, Donald!'' and from ''washingtonpost.com/news''-Meryl Streep was right. Donald Trump did mock a disabled reporter.[By Callum Borchers January 9]- and from "dailykos.com"- "
Here Were McConnell's Requirements For Obama's Nominees.[By pollwatcher,Sunday Jan 08, 2017]- and from "http://hacker-bot.tumblr.com/post"-"Trump is way off on Russia hack report: Max Boot"="His reaction suggests a guilty conscience and the possibility that something sinister is going on." 
#FuckTrump  ,,  #YouNotMyPresident  ,,  #Fuck_KKK  ,,  #FuckPutin  ,,  #OpRussia  ,,  #OpChina  ,,  #OpHongKongDAB  ,,  #Anonymous  ,,  #Hastings  .
------------
And share the< HKDSE CHEMISTRY A Modern View- Examination Survival Guide 1 >-( it is about $500HKD of this Exam set book)-

*




**Please use the Google god of high-tech translator to translate your national / local language ah ^^ -
**請各位使用谷歌大神的高科技翻譯器來翻譯你們的國家/地方的語言啊^^-
**지역 / 국가 언어 ^^ 번역 하이테크 번역기의 구글 하나님을 사용하십시오 -
**Se il vous plaît utiliser le dieu Google de traducteur de haute technologie pour traduire votre ah langue nationale / locale ^^-
**あなたの国内/地域言語ああ^^翻訳するハイテクトランスレータのGoogleの神を使用してください -
**Будь ласка, використовуйте бога Google високотехнологічного перекладача, щоб перевести свій національним / регіональним мовою ах ^^-
**กรุณาใช้พระเจ้าของ Google แปลที่มีเทคโนโลยีสูงในการแปล / ชาติภาษาท้องถิ่นของคุณอา ^^-
**Si prega di utilizzare il dio Google Traduttore di high-tech per tradurre il vostro / ah lingua locale nazionale ^^-
**Fadlan isticmaal ilaah Google ee turjumaan farsmada heerka sare ah loo turjumi / ka ah luuqada maxaliga ah ee qaranka ^^-
**Gunakan dewa Google penerjemah berteknologi tinggi untuk menerjemahkan nasional / ah bahasa lokal ^^-
**Por favor, utilice el dios Google Traductor de alta tecnología para traducir su / ah nacional idioma local ^^-
**आफ्नो राष्ट्रिय / स्थानीय भाषा आह ^^ अनुवाद गर्न उच्च-प्रविधी अनुवादक को गुगल देवता प्रयोग गर्नुहोस् -
**Bonvolu uzi la Google dio de alta-tech tradukisto por traduki vian nacian / lokan lingvon ah ^^-

#FuckTrump

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd

 see the nice guy "NowThis" push this msg on the twitter
My tears is following down, sadly...

#WhatTheFuckingNaziTrumpdidb4
#NoWar
#NoBanNoWall
#HumanRights
#Anonymous
#ObamaAgain  -






 We cant fogive the Nazi.Trump did all b4  
he just make America broken" again !!!
We dont forgive him,
#Locked him up
#Anonymous
#AnonFamily
#Pray
#God
 I really hate him !

 *Life:
"One" and "two systems" lie



 In Trump and Xi Jinping's call, Trump should "Xi Jinping's request, the expression will respect the" one China policy ". Taking care of the Chinese face, so today began to Xi Ping Ping Trombe talks.
One of the most ridiculous phenomena in modern international politics is the principle of "one China" that the Chinese Communist Party has adhered to and requires all countries that have established diplomatic relations with the Chinese to pursue the "one China" policy. Does the United States have an "one-American" principle? Do other countries in the world have the principle of "one country X"? No. Because all countries do not actually have "two X countries", and China's old emphasis on "one China", it is precisely because there are actually two China, so we must keep ignoring the fact that to emphasize "one China."
"The Economist" has an article: "Let's lie in peace in Asia," said: "Everyone knows that it is not true, but has to" endure the country "and to maintain this illusion. Is clearly cynical. "Obviously into the jurisdiction of the Republic of China, and can not get a visa from the People's Republic of China, clearly holding the Republic of China passport can be visa-free access to more than 100 countries (including the United States), but the Chinese side of the world recognized only one China. Is this nonsense? Trump said after the election, "I do not know why we have to be limited to a Chinese policy", and then pick up the greeting of Tsai's message, in fact, only respect the facts, but led to tension in US-China relations. The United States and the world believe that it is only with the CCP saying that "only one China" lies before it can maintain the security of Asia. Otherwise, the CCP threatens to move against Taiwan.
The United States has pursued a "one China" policy for more than 30 years, recognizing "one China" and maintaining its substantive ties with Taiwan. Although ignorant of the facts, but without prejudice to the interests of the United States. Trump finally met the requirements of the CCP in his conversations with Xi Jinping, because "there is no broken thing to do not repair", as the "economists" said, countries follow the "one" lie, so that Asia can enjoy peace.
The "1992 Consensus" that the Chinese Communist Party insists on accepting Taiwan is also a lie. Because in 1992 there was no consensus on what the Kuomintang said, "the 1992 consensus" is "one China, each of which is expressed", and the "1992 Consensus" emphasized by the Chinese Communist Party is only one China principle. What is the consensus? But like all countries accept the "one China" lie, the CCP has also accepted the "nine two consensus" that does not exist in the Taiwan authorities.
The idea of ​​"one country, two systems" is also a lie. System is the foundation of the country, Sun Yat-sen revolution is to establish a "republic" system, rather than to establish a country of the Republic of China. Mao Zedong revolution, but also to establish a socialist system, and the first is not to establish the People's Republic of China this country. Americans speak patriotic, must emphasize the US Constitution, and even that: if there is no constitutional protection of the people of all rights, to the country to do? Establish a system for the first, the establishment of the country in the post. The reason and foundation of the people to establish the state is to establish a system. If a country can have two systems, three systems, it means that the state is fixed, and the system can be changed, you can save can be wasted, then the Chinese land should be Xia. This is not only in line with the principle of establishing the state according to the system, does not conform to the human system according to the system to change all the history of the country, but also shows the system of expediency and instability.
"One China" is the greatest lie in the world. "One country, two systems" is a big lie.


Monday to Friday

Li Yi
Http://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee



在特朗普與習近平的通話中,特朗普應「習近平的要求,表達會尊重『一個中國政策』」。顧全了中國面子,於是有今天開始的習近平特朗普會談。
現代國際政治中,最荒謬的現象之一,就是中共堅持的「一個中國」原則,並要求所有與中共建交的國家奉行「一個中國」政策。美國有沒有「一個美國」原則?世界上其他國家有沒有「一個X國」原則?沒有。因為所有國家都實際上不存在「兩個X國」,而中國老強調「一個中國」,正是因為實際上存在兩個中國,所以才要不停罔顧事實地要強調「一個中國」。
《經濟學人》有篇文章〈一中:讓亞洲和平的謊言〉說:「大家明明知道它不是真的,但卻得『相忍為國』,共同維護這個假象。……一中政策其實根本是胡扯。」明明進入中華民國管轄地區,並不能從中華人民共和國得到簽證,明明持中華民國護照可以免簽證進入一百多個國家(包括美國),但中共偏要全世界國家承認只有一個中國。這是不是胡扯?特朗普當選後表示「我不知道為甚麼我們得受限於一個中國政策」,又接了蔡英文的祝賀電話,其實都只是尊重事實,但卻導致美中關係一度緊張。美國和全世界都認為,只有跟着中共說「只有一個中國」的假話,才可以保持亞洲的安全,否則中共就揚言有可能對台動武啦。
美國30多年來實行「一個中國」政策,即承認「一個中國」,而又保持同台灣的實質聯繫。雖然有昧事實,但無損美國利益。特朗普終於在與習近平通話中滿足中共的要求,是因為「沒有壞掉的東西就不要去修」,正如《經濟學人》所說,各國依從「一中」的謊言,讓亞洲得享和平。
中共堅持要台灣接受的「九二共識」,也是假話。因為事實上1992年並沒有達成甚麼共識,國民黨說的「九二共識」是「一個中國,各自表述」,而中共強調的「九二共識」就只有一個中國原則,沒有各自表述。何來共識?但就像要所有國家接受「一個中國」的假話一樣,中共也要台灣當局接受不存在的「九二共識」。
「一國兩制」的設想其實也是假話。制度是國家的基礎,孫中山革命是要建立「共和」制度,而不是要建立一個中華民國這個國家。毛澤東革命,也是要建立社會主義制度,而首先不是要建立中華人民共和國這個國家。美國人講愛國,一定強調美國憲法,甚至認為:如果沒有憲法保障人民的所有權利,要這個國家來做甚麼?建立制度為先,建立國家在後。人民建立國家的原因及基礎,就是為了要確立一種制度。如果一個國家可以有兩種制度、三種制度,那就意味國家是固定的,而制度是可以變、可以存可以廢的,那麼現在中華大地應該還是夏朝。這不但不符合依制度建立國家的原理,不符合人類依制度改變國體的所有歷史,而且也顯示制度的權宜性和不穩定性。
「一個中國」是現世最大謊言,「一國兩制」則是次大謊言。
周一至周五刊出

李怡
http://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee

-[08/04/2017]Update -see the nice guy "NowThis" push this msg on the twitter
My tears is following down, sadly...
((  #WhatTheFuckingNaziTrumpdidb4
#NoWar
#NoBanNoWall
#HumanRights
#Anonymous
#ObamaAgain  ))-

 http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html

===

#FuckTrump

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd






Mother wrote a letter to the "Zeng Junhua*

( 67,994)
 Recently, the public with the title "waiting for Zeng Junhua" author, that originally hated small circle election, but because her daughter would like to see Zeng Junhua side, specifically to the West Kowloon Center line, then found the public people do not know each other, but because Zeng Junhua dumped, Bluntly like the old fat Peng like loved.

In the text, the daughter asked, "Why is it that people who are so high will not be able to do so?", I can not answer my wife, but also hope that her daughter will "enjoy more than eight years of careless life", because the present situation, She was going to join the community when the way to go will be much harder than the author.

Zeng Junhua on fb in response to the article, referring to the moment is often in March 26 after the Hong Kong will be how, but that at least now, his supporters have no distinction between blue and yellow, frankly pleased that the unity Hong Kong made the first step. He also refers to the support from the public is motivated by him, but also an invisible pressure and responsibility, because as Hong Kong people, he deeply appreciate the years of Hong Kong people on life, social and political all sorts of helplessness and powerlessness The

Zeng Junhua refers to the election, for him and the people of Hong Kong, are to pursue a political dream, he still believes that political dreams have the opportunity to achieve. Zeng Junhua also refers to the hope of writing Li Tai, if the daughter grow up to live in a better than today, Hong Kong, she should remember that because of her today and he, and countless Hong Kong people together for this dream paid.

 Chase the city suddenly the size of things, that is, like Apple [scene] FB!

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170320/19964288


日前有市民以題「等待曾俊華」撰文,指本來討厭小圈子選舉,但由於女兒想見曾俊華一面,特意到西九龍中心排隊,遂發現在場市民雖互不相識,但因為曾俊華傾得投契,直言曾儼如昔日肥彭般受愛戴。

文中慨嘆,女兒問「為什麼民望那麼高的人會做不到特首」,筆者黎太卻答不了,更希望女兒「多享受十年八載無憂無慮的生活」,因為以現在的情況,她投身社會之時要走的路將比筆者走的艱難得多。

曾俊華周日在fb回應有關文章,指這陣子經常在想3月26日之後的香港會是怎樣,但認為最少現時,他的支持者已不用藍黃去區分,直言感到欣慰,認為是為團結香港作出的第一步努力。他又指來自市民的種種支持對他來說是動力,但也是一種無形的壓力和責任,因作為香港人,他深切體會到這些年香港人對生活、對社會及政治的種種無奈及無力感。

曾俊華指這場選舉,對他和香港人來說,都是要追尋一個政治夢想,他仍然相信政治夢想有實現的機會。曾俊華又指希望撰文的黎太,若女兒長大後能活在一個比今天更美好的香港,她應記得是因為今天有她和他、及無數香港人一起為這個夢付出過。

追實城中突發大小事,即 like 蘋果【現場】FB!

===







 #LiarTrump you cant stop the US citizens , we are still to #impeach you, you're a evil !
#NoBanNoWall

#FuckTrump

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd

i wont be forget you're a Idot !! & you can not stop me to show the fact in the Google Great God (net./.)in the World everywhere~
#ObamaAgain


-Update[20/03/2017]Hong Kong ppls wants a “Head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”=“Mother wrote a letter to the for *Zeng Junhu*- oneof specifically Leader ” with the HK citizen to have a *political dreams*...~"
 http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html

 #wtf LiarTrump did in his "Great Americans lies'', all bullshit, his fucking asshole 

#FuckTrump

  Trump's advice to Merkel's handshake is not heard.( Associated Press...all right media show the fact!)






 ----
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20170319/19962945 
 German Chancellor Angela Merkel's visit to the United States, due to early last week, snow and snow to Washington and postponed to the day before yesterday, but the White House "chill" is not reduced, the US President Trump posed as "ice" attitude hospitality, Mrs. Merkel's handshake proposal was turned a deaf ear; the two sides on NATO's defense, trade, immigration and other issues are also inconspicuous.
During the election of the US presidency last year, Trump attacked Merkel again, causing the other to fight back; the first interview, Merkel intended to repair the relationship. Trump in the West Wing door to meet Merkel, the two have a harmonious handshake, but sitting in the oval office to the media shooting, the body language but tell the truth: seeking to repair the Merkel body tendency Trump, and from time to time Head to see him; Trump is the body forward, legs broke open, palms closed, just look forward.

Trump can not hear the question

Handshake for the businessman Trump is commonplace; last month Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to visit the White House, was forced to shake hands 19 seconds, Abe "anti-eye" into the global hot words. But the day before Trump asked reporters repeatedly asked to shake hands to hear, Merkel close to ask, "Do you want to shake hands?" He did not know is intentional or unintentional, did not respond and see do not look at her, so Merkel smiled embarrassment. Trump native of Germany, this is a good topic of chat, but the two did not gossip, the atmosphere cramped. After the two talks held a joint press conference, try to put aside differences. At the beginning, Merkel said, "It is much better to talk to each other than to comment on each other" and to speak "American priority" smoothly, because she is also the best for Germany, and everyone should be mutually beneficial. And Trump also praised Merkel and French President Hollande for a peace plan for the Ukrainian issue.
But the two words do not speculation is an indisputable fact. It was said that NATO's outdated Trump had expressed support for NATO, but criticized countries for failing to allocate funds. Trump yesterday in Twitter refers to Germany owes NATO and the United States a lot of money. In terms of trade and trade, Trump argued that Germany's success was "the result of Germany's own solidarity with Europe," and that it was clear that Trump was holding Britain's position in Europe and skeptical of multilateral trade agreements The

Immigration policy secretly sword

They also vaguely accused each other of immigration policy. Trump refers to immigration is preferential treatment rather than rights, to be based on national security first; Merkel refers to the protection of border security, the consideration of the rebirth of opportunities for refugees. After the press conference, the two finally shook hands, but the analysis that the difference between the two values, Merkel and Obama call the name of the virtuous leader friendship, difficult to reproduce in the short term.
AFP

 



德國總理默克爾的訪美行程,因上周初大風雪殺到華盛頓而押後到前日,但白宮的「寒意」未減,美國總統特朗普擺出相敬如「冰」的態度待客,對默克爾提出握手合照的建議,竟置若罔聞;兩人對北約防務、貿易、移民等多項議題亦是歧見盡顯。
去年競選美國總統期間,特朗普一再攻擊默克爾,惹來對方還擊;這次兩人首度面談,默克爾意圖修補關係。特朗普在西翼門外迎接默克爾,兩人有和睦握手,但坐在橢圓形辦公室內給傳媒拍攝時,肢體語言卻說出實情:尋求修好的默克爾身體傾向特朗普,且不時轉頭看他;特朗普卻是身體前傾,雙腿擘開,雙掌合攏,只是往前看。

特朗普扮聽不到提問

握手對於生意人特朗普來說是家常便飯;上月日本首相安倍晉三訪白宮,就被迫握手19秒,安倍「反白眼」成全球熱話。但前日特朗普對記者一再要求握手裝作聽不見,默克爾靠近問「要不要握手拍照?」他不知是有意或無意,未回應兼看都不看她,令默克爾笑得尷尬。特朗普祖籍德國,本是聊天好題目,但兩人卻沒閒話家常,氣氛侷促。兩人會談後舉行聯合記者會,盡力擱下分歧。一開始默克爾示好說,「彼此對話比起各自評論對方好得多」;又圓滑地表示接受「美國優先」,因她亦一樣為德國爭取最好,大家該互惠互利。而特朗普亦有讚揚默克爾與法國總統奧朗德為烏克蘭問題尋求和平方案。
但兩人話不投機是不爭的事實。曾說北約過時的特朗普雖表示支持北約,但批評各國沒有盡責分擔經費。特朗普昨日在Twitter指德國欠北約和美國很多錢。經貿方面,特朗普批對德貿易逆差大,默克爾則說德國成功「是德國自身與歐洲團結促成」,顯然是衝着特朗普明撐英國脫歐和對多邊貿易協議抱懷疑的立場。

移民政策暗中格劍

兩人還隱晦地指摘對方移民政策。特朗普指移民是優待而非權利,須以國民安全為先;默克爾則指保障邊境安全之餘,該考慮難民重生機會。記者會後兩人終於再握手,但分析認為兩人價值觀差異大,默克爾跟奧巴馬互叫名字的美德領袖情誼,短期內難再現。
法新社

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170318/19962138

 In the last week, in the academic institutions, the media polls, Zeng Junhua's popularity continue to lead Lin Zheng'e, Hu Guoxing, so that Beijing and the West can not completely turn a blind eye, then sent a pro-organized organizations to throw the results of alternative polls , Dispatched Queen scholar throws alternative interpretation, trying to distort public opinion, misleading the election committee. Under the authority of political pressure, the answer insects everywhere to climb enough strange, but whether underestimated the majority of the election of the wisdom and self-esteem, underestimated the courage and endurance of the people continue to fight?

Questioned resignation on curse big help

Lin Zheng Yue e to restore the decline of the fall of the hope, at the election forum on the resignation of speech, to show the importance of public opinion. Ridiculous is that so "good play" speech, not only failed to win the public applause, but also led to the resentment behind the manipulator. She persists in painting, emphasizing the height of the public and resignation is two different things, the result is more and more black, even the Hong Kong and Macao Research Association vice president Liu Zhaogui do not agree, that do not understand her explanation.
However, known as the Beijing microphone known as Liu Zhaojia Lin Zheng's question is nothing more than curse big help. On the one hand, during the early days of the NPC and CPPCC meetings, Beijing officials and pro-people were no longer emphasizing the theory of distrust, not naming, and even publicly saying that any candidate was elected to the central government and appointed public opinion to guess Beijing Of the Zeng Junhua opened a green light. But Liu Zhaogui said in the radio program yesterday, "two sessions" during the central support Lin Zheng'e's biggest change. He also estimated that Lin Zheng'e part of the nomination or will be lost in the vote, but I believe there are other support votes in the election the first round of voting has been able to win.
On the other hand, Liu Zhaogang and Lin Zhengmin hope for sustained malaise proposed alternative painting, that is different from the prestige of public opinion, poll scores only that a person is easy to close or personality more acceptable, and prestige leaders, to "order To the people must follow you in great things. " Implied meaning, Zeng Junhua has hope, but no policy followers, Lin Zheng no public but prestige, for the government.
As a political scholar who has enjoyed a reputation in both China and Hong Kong, Liu Zhaojia's solution can not be said to be ingenuity. But it is difficult to understand is that there is no hope to prestige? Since there are prestige, followers who, why not hope? Liu Zhaogai is not wrong to prestige when the prestige it? China is an authoritarian country, is a one-party dictatorship of electoral packaging, and there are many followers in Hong Kong, and the people who live, but enjoy the hope and prestige, it is difficult to compliment.

Miss the big parade in vain to make the microphone

In fact, Liu Zhaogai since leaving the university after the political, wrong assessment of public opinion, wrong assessment of the incident is different. On the eve of the 7.1 parade in 2003, Liu Zhaogao said in the television program as chief adviser of the Central Policy Unit that an estimated 30,000 people took to the streets. As a result, the 500,000 parade rewrote the political ecology and direction of Hong Kong. Liu Zhaogan later explained that he was talking about "30,000 people out of the procession, not surprising", misunderstood but can not come out to clarify, "the biggest regret since the political".
In 2014, the public strongly opposed the pseudo-universal election of the government. Liu Zhaogai again as a scholar to interpret the poll, that will oppose the number of political reform will rise again, but only up to five and five to support the number. He also warned that the political reform, the opposition and the central government will further deteriorate. As a result, when the Legislative Council voted, 28 votes against the "No-Even Uncle" and 8 votes in favor, Liu Zhaogai was in vain.
Liu Zhaogai's election to the Chief Executive's "Estimated Number" also has a criminal record. In July last year, he said in the radio program that the Central Government hoped that the Chief Executive would have chosen to compete because of the failure of the political reform, if it was felt that the resumption of the "hand-picked" would crack down on the management of prestige, the central authorities would not like the election , Resulting in a serious tear of the system, so eventually there will be only two founders to send candidates. As a result, not only the hand was restored, and there were more than two candidates.
It is difficult to estimate Beijing's instructions and the predictions of the results of the first round of voting on the Chief Executive's election. On the contrary, there is no doubt that the Chief Executive of Hong Kong is a small circle of games. The general public has no right to vote. There are also some of the CCP's Cephalopods, but most of the Elections still live in Hong Kong and can not ignore the public opinion, Will not blindly mislead the authority of the government or pressure, vote will make a decision in line with social justice and personal dignity.
Monday to Saturday published Li Ping




特首跑馬仔進入最後一周,在學術機構、傳媒的民調中,曾俊華的民望繼續遙遙領先林鄭月娥、胡國興,令北京和西環也不能完全視若無睹,於是出動親共組織拋出另類民調結果,出動御用學者拋出另類解讀,試圖曲解民意、誤導選委。在威權政治高壓下,應聲蟲遍地爬不足為怪,但是否低估了多數選委的智慧和自尊、低估了市民繼續抗爭的勇氣和耐力?

質疑辭職論 小罵大幫忙

林鄭月娥為挽回民望落後的敗象,不惜在選舉論壇上拋出辭職論,以示對民意的重視。可笑的是,如此「好打得」言論,不只未能贏得市民掌聲,還引致幕後操盤者的不滿。她連日解畫,強調民望高低與辭職是兩碼事,結果越描越黑,連全國港澳研究會副會長劉兆佳也不以為然,表示不明白她的解釋。
不過,素有北京傳聲筒之稱的劉兆佳對林鄭的質疑無非是小罵大幫忙。一方面,早前全國人大、政協「兩會」期間,北京官員和親共人士不再強調不信任論、不任命論,甚至公開表示任何一位候選人當選中央也會任命,令輿論猜測北京真的對曾俊華開了綠燈。但劉兆佳昨日在電台節目中表示,「兩會」期間中央支持林鄭月娥的大勢無變。他又估計,林鄭月娥部份提名或會在投票時流失,但相信有其他支持票,在選舉第一輪投票已可勝出。
另一方面,劉兆佳又為林鄭民望持續萎靡不振提出另類解畫,指民望有別於威望,民調得分高只表示一個人較易親近或個性較為人接受,而有威望的領袖,才能「令到群眾喺重大事情上一定追隨你」。言下之意,曾俊華有民望,但沒有政策追隨者,林鄭沒民望反而有威望,適合主政。
作為一個曾在中港兩地享有聲譽的政治學者,劉兆佳的解畫不能不說是別出心裁。但實在難以明白的是,沒有民望何來威望?既然有威望、追隨者眾,何以沒有民望?劉兆佳是不是錯把威權當威望呢?中國是一個威權國家,是有選舉包裝的一黨專政國家,在香港也有眾多追隨者、應聲蟲,但享有的民望、威望,實在難以恭維。

錯估大遊行 枉做傳聲筒

其實,劉兆佳自離開大學從政後,錯估民意、錯估上意的事件不一而足。2003年7.1大遊行前夕,劉兆佳以中央政策組首席顧問身份在電視節目中表示,估計有3萬人上街遊行。結果,50萬人大遊行改寫了香港的政治生態和走向。劉兆佳後來解釋,自己當時說的是「3萬人出來遊行,不覺奇怪」,被誤解但又不能出來澄清,是「從政以來最大的遺憾」。
2014年,市民強烈反對梁振英政府的偽普選方案。劉兆佳又以學者身份解讀民調,指反對政改人數會再上升,但最多只能和支持人數成五五比。他同時警告,否決政改,反對派與中央關係會進一步惡化。結果,立法會投票時因「等埋發叔」鬧劇而導致28票反對、8票贊成,劉兆佳枉做北京傳聲筒。
劉兆佳對特首選舉「估錯數」也有前科。去年7月,他在電台節目中說,中央希望特首選舉有競爭,因為政改失敗後,如果被人覺得恢復「欽點」,會打擊管治威信,但中央又不希望像上次選舉般,導致建制派嚴重撕裂,因此最終只會出現2名建制派候選人。結果,不只欽點恢復了,建制派候選人也超過2名。
以劉兆佳的往績,實在難以估算他所轉達的北京指示及對特首選舉首輪投票結果的預測有幾成可信、可靠。相反,無可置疑的是,香港特首選舉雖是小圈子遊戲,普眾市民沒有投票權,選委中也不乏中共的應聲蟲傳聲筒,但多數選委仍生活在香港,不能無視周圍的民情民意,不會盲從威權政府的誤導或壓力,投票時會做出符合社會公義及個人尊嚴的決定。
周一至周六刊出
李平

追實城中突發大小事,即 like 蘋果【現場】FB!

-see these 2days what happen in the Google news & twitter, and apple daily news :"Trump once refused to shake hands embarrassing Merkel visited the United States was cold to be"-the fact !!! #FuckTrump-
http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html

 ===

#FuckTrump

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd

 The Polish opposition and the people protested against Japan, protesting more than a year of law and justice to the party government to restrict media into Congress. Coincides with the United States elected by the incitement of populism and conspiracy theory of the rise of the President of Trump, there are media and scholars to see in the eyes, to play to the situation in Poland, worry about "today, Poland, tomorrow, the United States," warning populism May erode democracy.

Trump has repeatedly issued a speech against women and immigrants, "Washington Post" in Berlin, Germany, director of the French actress (Anthony Faiola) took him and the Polish government par, since last year, the Polish law and justice party patriotic revolution After the banner came to power, a series of "anti-intellectual" reforms were promoted, including the reduction in the length of evolution in school curricula, the increase in the number of "patriotic" history hours, and the promotion of the use of condoms in sex education to improve women's risk of cancer; Sex discrimination and racial discrimination in society, there are openly officials openly on facebook that the hotel should not be forced to provide services to blacks and homosexuals, and even to respect the "traditional gender role" on the grounds refused to participate in the international conference against violence against women The
On the economic front, Trump promised to make money through tax cuts, and the Polish government sent money to families with children, lowering the retirement age, and being opposed by the opposition as "buying tickets"; another coincidence is that both sides Global warming and human economic activity, as well as the Paris Agreement on emission reduction measures skeptical.

Fried 130 reporters palm of the people to lift the fight

In addition, the Polish government took office after the replacement of 300 state-owned enterprises, 1,600 civil servants, the public broadcaster 130 journalists "speculation" in order to direct control of public opinion, even the prosecution office can not escape the big shake. Bloomberg recently warned that the Polish government this year's transfusion action, may be the Trump campaign slogan "Drain the Swamp" (Drain the Swamp) "real demonstration", and that Trump has threatened to disrupt his appointment Supreme Court Justice of the media group, for the test of democracy and the rule of law.
In fact, as early as Trump was elected, the "China Post" columnist Anne Applebaum had compared him to Jaroslaw Kaczynski, a law and justice party leader who was passionate about conspiracy. In 2010, Jarvoswal's twin brother, Lech Kaczynski, died in the western Russian air crash, and despite the fact that the crash had been confirmed by human error, Yaroslav had been making a big fuss, To the supporters that the national elite has been manipulated by foreign countries since 1989, all the things that happened in the country are "conspiracy script" part; and Trump manipulation of conspiracy theory masterpiece, it is bored to promote President Obama is not in The United States was born and elected before the election was controlled.

"After the truth" does not care that deer for the horse

Yaroslav and supporters deny that they are eating democracy, saying they are building a strong country, returning the country's correct historical path and Catholic values ​​to the Poles. Local polls show that the law and justice party in power after a year of support for 36%, ranking first in all political parties. Warsaw Public Affairs Research Institute in charge of Koharchik worried about the "post-truth" era has come, no one depends on the politicians as deer and arbitrary.
United States "Washington Post" / Bloomberg




波蘭反對派和民眾連日抗爭,抗議上台一年多的法律與正義黨政府限制傳媒進入國會採訪。適逢美國選出被指靠煽動民粹和陰謀論崛起的候任總統特朗普,有傳媒和學者看在眼裏,借題發揮地以波蘭局勢自況,憂慮「今日波蘭,明日美國」,警告民粹主義可能蠶食民主。
特朗普屢次發表針對女性和移民的惹火言論,《華盛頓郵報》駐德國柏林主管法約拉(Anthony Faiola)拿他與波蘭政府相提並論,指自去年波蘭法律與正義黨打着愛國主義革命旗號上台後,即推動一系列「反智主義」改革,包括建議在學校課程中減少進化論的篇幅、增加「愛國」歷史課時數、在性教育課堂中宣揚使用避孕套會提高女性患癌風險;社會上性別歧視和種族歧視風氣當道,有平權官員公然在facebook表示酒店不應被迫向黑人和同性戀者提供服務,甚至以尊重「傳統性別角色」為由,拒絕參加反對暴力對待婦女的國際會議。
經濟方面,特朗普承諾透過減稅還富於民,而波蘭政府則向有子女的家庭派錢、降低退休年齡,被反對派斥為「買票」;另一巧合的是,雙方都對全球暖化與人類經濟活動的關係、以至《巴黎協定》的減排措施抱懷疑態度。

炒130記者掌輿論掀抗爭

另外,波蘭政府上台後撤換300名國企行政人員、1,600名公務員,還把公共廣播機構的130名記者「炒魷」,以便直接控制輿論,連檢察辦公室也不能倖免被大換血。彭博社日前在報道中,警告波蘭政府這一年的換血行動,可能就是特朗普競選口號「抽乾沼澤」(Drain the Swamp)的「真實示範」,並指特朗普曾揚言瓦解反對他任命最高法院大法官的傳媒集團,為民主和法治帶來考驗。
事實上,早在特朗普當選前,《華郵》專欄作家阿普爾鮑姆(Anne Applebaum)已將他比作擅長煽動陰謀論牌的法律與正義黨黨魁雅羅斯瓦夫(Jaroslaw Kaczynski)。2010年,雅羅斯瓦夫的孖生弟弟、時任總統卡欽斯基(Lech Kaczynski)在俄羅斯西部空難身亡,儘管當局早已證實空難是人為錯誤造成,雅羅斯瓦夫卻一直拿事件大做文章,向支持者表示國家精英已受外國操縱、自1989年以來國家發生的所有事情都是「陰謀劇本」一部份;而特朗普操弄陰謀論的代表作,則是樂此不疲地宣揚總統奧巴馬並非在美國出生和選前不斷指選舉被操控。

「後真相」不在乎指鹿為馬

雅羅斯瓦夫和支持者否認他們蠶食民主,稱他們正在建設強大的國家,把國家的正確歷史道路和天主教價值觀歸還予波蘭人。當地民調顯示,法律與正義黨執政一年後支持度為36%,高踞所有政黨之首。華沙公共事務研究所主管庫哈爾奇克擔憂「後真相」時代已降臨,無人在乎政客指鹿為馬及任意妄為。
美國《華盛頓郵報》/彭博社

 Chase the city suddenly the size of things, that is, like Apple [scene] FB!
 *"Today, Poland tomorrow, USA"
Scholars warn that populism can erode democracy - from
 ( hk.apple.nextmedia.com ) - you can see that why i very like this media, it's show the truth!~
 
http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html
 ===

#FuckTrump

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd



 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/supplement/20161111/55899636






See 'Li Yi' and 'Li Ping' Mr. and Apple Daily's wonderful article.
Seven dead and ungrateful Hong Kong gangs of the brutal police, there will be a bunch of ignorant and ridiculous communist swords to make despicable means trying to cover up the truth? An article [yesterday] Liang Zhenying, today Trump (Feng 睎 dry) really depicts the most vividly, the people of life in the demons absolutely show! But also to let them "shelter" it! The

The role of the media is to monitor the government's moral cultivation of the popular line of defense.

Liang Zhenying and Trump are autocratic regime 'stink'. No kind of scum! Slander our human social responsibility!

Please notice:

Do not forget 'conscience and morality' that makes us understand black and white and authenticity. The The The
#FuckTrump, #NotMyPresident, #fuckrussia, #LiArPotusTrump, #TheResistance, I must go tell you,
Do not forget 'conscience and morality' that makes us understand black and white and authenticity. The The The
#FuckTrump, #NotMyPresident, #fuckrussia, #LiArPotusTrump, #TheResistance,
 I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, what your #FuckingLies, #FuckTrump! The
#Amonymous #AnonFamily.

If i cant back to the twitter, i'll stay
Because you're a Evil Liar.
#HumanRights


=== MelodyRo ===

===

--看‘李怡’先生和‘李平’先生和蘋果日報的精彩文章。
七個死不悔錯的香港黑社會喪盡天良的警察,竟然會有一堆無知和可笑的共產黨流蟻作出卑劣手段試圖掩蓋真理?一篇【即時文摘】昨日梁振英,今天特朗普(馮睎乾) 著實描寫得淋漓盡致,把人們生活中的惡魔絕對地呈現出來!還能夠讓他們“避風頭”嗎!?

媒體的廣大作用,便是監控政府的道德修養風範的大衆防線。

梁振英和特朗普都是專制政權的‘臭皮囊’。沒種的敗類!汙蔑了我們人類社會責任!

Please notice:

不要忘記‘良知和道德’使我們認清黑白和真偽。。。。
#FuckTrump , #NotMyPresident  , #fuckrussia  , #LiArPotusTrump  , #TheResistance   , I must to tell you ,
不要忘記‘良知和道德’使我們認清黑白和真偽。。。。
#FuckTrump , #NotMyPresident  , #fuckrussia  , #LiArPotusTrump  , #TheResistance   ,
 I must to tell you ,you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., you're the begger stolen our country citizens tax/pay ,what your #FuckingLies , #FuckTrump !!
#Amonymous  #AnonFamily 。

if i cant back to the twitter , i‘ll stay
because you’re a Evil  。 Liar  。
#HumanRights


===MelodyRo===

===

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170221/19935116

 Seven police officers were beaten and sentenced to imprisonment for two years, who would have been worthy of justice, and the righteousness of justice, the slightest rationality and conscience would not question the court's decision. But in the Chinese mainland and Hong Kong, but there have been a large number of people out of suspicion, questioned the ruling, insulting the judge, and even "willing to beat the British" judge "Du Dawei hybrids invested 10,000 yuan" absurd proposal, The
The distortions of the values ​​are the most horrifying influence of these policemen. Excuse me, Mr Lau Wai-tsung, the Commissioner of Police, is not going to condemn the wrong guards and not apologize to the public. What is the "sad" Heavy and complicated "and approved the internal fund-raising of the Force to support the police officers involved in the case and the family members of the police officers. Intentional, clear.
As law enforcement officers know the law, is completely unacceptable behavior, Lu Weicong and Chen Zuguang also demonstrated the worst words: teach the next generation despite the offense! Like the children after the parents also reward their mistakes, how can children learn to understand the right and wrong ideas? It is necessary to mention that the members of the "Major Alliance" and "the Hong Kong Forces" are also distorting the values. Ask yourself, if your child's teacher due to lack of resources within the school, work pressure and your children playing black and blue, you will miss the beaten teacher? Do you want to punish the violent teacher, will you go to school to petition, shout "support teachers, forgive innocence"?
As well as the director in the facebook alleged abuse of the judge as a "dog officer", the column writer wrote that "the whole Hong Kong witness a scum to seven people were born", the Legislative Council in the facebook refers to the seven police is "The Magnificent Seven (magic seven "). Are good words for the seven police, distort the facts, teach the children of the table.
As we all know, the Chinese mainland is full of such reversal of right and wrong, unreasonable people, this time is even more intensified. "Microblogging red" Cai small heart actually post, upload the judge Du David's photo, and said willing to beat Du David invested 10,000 yuan. "The future will speed up the recovery of Hong Kong's jurisdictional authority and will not stick to the" Fifty Years "," he said.
Mainland China has experienced the devastation of the Cultural Revolution, the correct values ​​have vanished, "all to the money to see" mentality led to disregard of life of the milk, poison vegetables, waste oil, rubbish oil projects; leaders corruption, money and loved ones The situation of foreign evasion has made the mainland people as "normal" and "power" as "truth". It is not surprising that there are people in the Mainland, such as Cai's mind, because many mainlanders have become "ugly Chinese" by Bo Yang.
But are we also let Hong Kong sink as the mainland? Whether it is our beloved city by Liang Zhenying led the government to destroy, tear and continue to "continental" Whether to let our next generation be brainwashed into a distorted value, do not understand right and wrong people? Seven police were sentenced after all kinds of fallacies, abstinence, is to remind us, as parents, teachers, must speak out loud, warned the children, do not learn this ugly people! Right and wrong can not be distorted distortion, the spirit of the rule of law can not be polluted!
Han Lian Shan freelance writer


七位警員毆打市民被定罪判入獄兩年,本來是罪有應得、公義彰顯,稍有理性和良知的人都不會質疑法庭的裁決。偏偏在中國內地和香港,卻出現大批人歪理盡出,質疑裁決、辱罵法官,甚至出現「願意為實施毆打英籍『法官』杜大衛雜種的人士出資一萬元人民幣」的荒唐建議,教人心寒!
價值觀的扭曲是這群撐警人士最恐怖的影響,首推警務處處長盧偉聰的「護短」歪理,居然不去譴責犯錯警員、不向市民道歉,卻說些甚麼「難過」、「心情非常沉重和複雜」的說話,並批准警隊進行內部籌款以支援涉案警員及其家人;再配合警察隊員佐級協會主席陳祖光「聖人也難免有小錯」的說法,把七警的暴行合理化的意圖,昭然若揭。
作為執法人員知法犯法,是完全不可接受的行徑,盧偉聰和陳祖光還示範了最壞的言教:教導下一代儘管犯法!就像孩子犯錯後父母還獎勵他們一樣,孩子們怎會學懂是非對錯觀念?不得不提的是「撐警大聯盟」、「愛護香港力量」的成員,也是扭曲價值觀的表表者。撫心自問,若你們孩子的老師因校內資源不足、工作壓力大而把你們的孩子打得遍體鱗傷,你們會放過打人的教師嗎?校長要懲處施暴的教師,你們會去學校請願,高呼「支持教師,赦免無罪」嗎?
還有導演在臉書涉嫌辱罵法官為「狗官」,專欄作家撰文稱「全香港見證一個人渣把七段人生毀了」,立法會議員在臉書指七警是「The Magnificent Seven(神奇七俠)」。都是為七警說好話,扭曲事實,教壞孩子的表表者。
眾所周知,中國大陸充斥這類顛倒是非、歪理連篇的人士,這一回更是變本加厲。「微博紅人」蔡小心居然發帖,上載法官杜大衛的相片,並稱願意為毆打杜大衛出資一萬元。蔡更大言不慚稱:「未來將加速收回香港司法權等許可權,不會拘泥於『五十年不變』。」
中國大陸經歷文化大革命的摧殘,正確價值觀已蕩然無存,「一切向錢看」的心態導致罔顧人命的毒奶、毒菜、地溝油、豆腐渣工程等湧現;領導們貪腐、錢和親人往外國逃的現況更令內地人視貪腐為「正常」、視強權為「真理」。在內地出現如蔡小心的人物,不足為奇,因為很多大陸人已成為柏楊筆下「醜陋的中國人」。
但是我們是否也讓香港沉淪如內地?是否讓這個我們深愛的城市被梁振英領導的政府摧殘、撕裂後繼續「大陸化」?是否讓我們的下一代也被洗腦成為價值觀扭曲、不懂是非的人?七警被判刑後出現的種種歪理、畸象,正正提醒我們,作為家長、教師,必須大聲疾呼,告誡孩子,千萬不要學這群醜陋的人!是非對錯不容歪理扭曲,法治精神不可污染!

韓連山
自由撰稿人

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170228/19942465

 The four police associations held a meeting of seven members of the General Assembly, speaking on the stage and from the Jewish persecuted by the Nazis, by the police officers and should be. Three members of the Basic Law and members of the Basic Law Committee, went to the stadium, said they would legislate in the Legislative Council, and said that banks would employ seven police officers. This scene and the language of the refueling means that the further differentiation and tearing of the society means that the whole police force against the judicial independence is not only the individual police and the entire police force supports the "violence" of the demonstrators. Coupled with the mainland media on the Hong Kong judicial independence of the ugly slander, to maintain social order, the protection of the public's police force, has become the same nature with the mainland public security tendencies, the police's image of the change, slide to the CCP's function: class rule tool. Judicial independence of the court, but also by the CCP and pro-established people to the class rule tool risk.
A friend sent me a message on that night and said, "See Hong Kong become so sad."
Hong Kong is not the case before. Even after a few years before the transfer of sovereignty, to participate in demonstrations, the police cooperated with demonstrators, including open and maintaining order. Since the establishment of the ICAC, after the police and police conflict, the police in the public image is getting better and better. On the mainland, "public security comes" is to frighten the child; in Hong Kong, "police uncle" in the child's mind is to help the people. Until now, the professionalism of the Hong Kong police handling case is still one of the examples of the Asian region.
Since Liang Zhenying came to power, the government's bad governance has continued, the senior officials of the scandal continued, the public pursuit of democracy and destiny of the waves inevitably rise, demonstrations and activities without day, and the government to respond to a rogue attitude, Can not help but become more intense. In this case, the police work will naturally be super heavy. And because of the impact of the demonstrators, and the police to maintain the order of the contradictions, the police in specific occasions will be the object of the impact of demonstrators. This is a common thing in demonstrations around the world. From the police professional point of view, this is nothing more than the implementation of the task when it is a bar. If the police and the demonstrators are to see each other with empathy, then the police as the social order of the defenders and legitimate violence, the natural use of violence should be minimal use. Because the protesters were not the police, and the protesters' demands were not for personal gain, they were not robbers, thieves, violent violations of others, and not the object that the police should target.
The people who fight for democracy and justice, and the police against each other, in fact, Liang Zhenying regime and its vassal provoked due. It is absolutely illegal for the police to use lynchings against the demonstrators. The penalties imposed by the court are not only against the police force, but also to prevent the Force from being misguided under the provocation of politicians. It is actually a means of maintaining the dignity and professional rule of law. If it is necessary to use the Nazis to persecute the Jews as a metaphor, then the police need to review whether they are in the same legitimate use of violence, rather than in the side can not resist the Jews. Legitimate use of violence is absolutely uncontrollable.
To resolve the differentiation of the community tear, the need to fight with those who maintain the order to each other with empathy to look at each other. What is more important is that the politicians and the founders are able to respect the independence of the judiciary and the seriousness of the rule of law, to attach great importance to procedural justice, as well as to the different political spectrum of social communication, in particular, can not provoke judicial independence of the words and deeds of fuel.

Li Yi published Monday to Friday
Https://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee






四個警察協會舉行撐七警會員大會,台上講粗口和自比被納粹迫害的猶太人,獲台下警員和應。三位議員和《基本法》委員會委員,前往撐場,表示會在立法會提出「辱警罪」立法,又表示有銀行將錄用七警。這種場面和這些火上加油的語言,意味着社會進一步分化與撕裂,意味着不僅是個別警察而且是整個警隊支持對示威者「施暴合理化」,整個警隊反對司法獨立的判罪。加上大陸媒體對香港司法獨立的醜詆,維持社會秩序、保護市民的警隊,有淪為與大陸公安性質相同的傾向,警隊的公正形象大變,滑向中共所賦予的功能:階級統治的工具。司法獨立的法庭,也有被中共和親建制人士推向階級統治工具的危險。
有朋友當晚給我短訊,說「看到香港變成這樣,很傷心」。
香港以前絕非如此。即使主權轉移後的幾年前,參與遊行示威,警方都與示威者合作,包括開路和維持秩序。自從廉署成立以來,歷經警廉衝突後,警察在市民中的形象越來越好。在大陸,「公安來了」是嚇唬孩子的話;在香港,「警察叔叔」在孩子心目中是幫助市民的人。直到如今,香港警察辦案的專業精神仍然是亞洲地區的典範之一。
自梁振英上台以來,政府的劣政惡政持續,特首高官的醜聞不斷,市民追求民主和命運自主的聲浪難免升高,示威抗爭活動無日無之,而且在政府以無賴態度回應之下,抗爭不免越趨激烈。在這種情況下,警察的工作自然會超級繁重。而由於示威者的衝擊,與警察維持秩序的矛盾,警方在特定場合會是示威者衝擊的對象。這在全世界的示威活動中,都是常見的事。從警察專業的角度,這不過是執行任務時必然發生的事情吧了。如果警方和示威者都以同理心去看對方,那麼警方作為社會秩序的維持者和合法暴力使用者,自然應該最小限度使用暴力。因為示威者的示威對象不是警察,而示威者的訴求也不是為了個人利益,他們不是劫匪、小偷、暴力侵犯他人者,不是警察應該針對的對象。
把爭取民主和公義的市民,與警察對立起來,其實是梁振英政權及其附庸者挑撥所致。警察對示威者動用私刑,絕對是違法行為。法庭判處警戒性的刑罰不僅不是對警隊的打擊,而且是防止警隊在政客挑撥下誤入歧途,實際上是維護警隊尊嚴和專業的法治手段。如果一定要以納粹迫害猶太人作比喻,那麼警察需要檢討的,是自己是否處於同樣合法使用暴力的一方,而不是處於無法反抗的猶太人一方。合法使用暴力絕對不能無節制。
解決社會的分化撕裂,需要抗爭者與維持秩序者彼此以同理心去看待對方。而更重要的,是當政者和建制派能夠尊重司法的獨立性和法治的嚴肅性,極度重視程序正義,以及同社會不同政治光譜的人士溝通,尤其不能對一些挑釁司法獨立的言行火上加油。

李怡
周一至周五刊出
https://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170302/19944661

The National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) opened tomorrow, and China began to enter the annual "two sessions". But different from Zhu Rongji, Wen Jiabao era, the CPPCC, the NPC "two sessions" is the prime minister home, now is "set (learning) right" era, the two sessions are Xi Jinping home. At home and abroad newspapers, networks, are concerned about the Xi Jiajun host, even before the financial decision-making meeting, the protagonist is also the central finance leading group leader Xi Jinping, let alone the official public opinion frequently learn core rally.
One of the reasons for the unpleasantness of Hong Kong is that she announced a series of off-site events after the election. The CCP's propaganda of Xi Jinping was a multi-pronged approach. One was to promote its achievements and to promote its high-level pledge , The third is to promote its "ground gas". Among them, the editor of the recent peace in power after the speech of several NPC deputies short-term click-through rate soared, because Xi Xiaping language civilian, ground gas.
Xi Jinping in Hunan delegation said that poverty alleviation should be accurate, "otherwise it is grenade bombardment fleas, do not solve the problem, it seems bustling, but no point to the point." In fact, "grenade bombardment flea" has long been reported, but also widely quoted by other officials, not expected to now Xi Xiaping to enhance the image of the ground is still useful. But, and then look at the media, the network touted Xi Jinping momentum, is still only grenade bombardment fleas lively, there is no point in the Chinese political and economic problems of the points.
China's official administration of the two major issues, one is the decree, and second, officials corruption. This is not an official verbal allegiance, nor is it loyal to the people, can be resolved. But also to see only the habitat army to seize the hills, the newly appointed National Development and Reform Commission Director He Lifeng, Minister of Commerce Zhong Shan, Hong Kong Deputy Director Chen Dong, Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing four municipalities clerk or mayor, forehead are printed with a habit, Heart printed with a bracelet. Among them, the most brave is the Tianjin Municipal Party Committee Secretary Li Hongzhong, actually "through the ancient and modern, guiding the direction, gas Changhong" to describe Xi Jinping speech.
However, Yin Jian not far. When Jiang Zemin's administration, Shanghai helped monopolize political, economic and cultural power. After Hu Jintao's reign, the regimental forces were in the middle of the day. Xi Jiajun's upper menacing, bustling, but the right of non-people by the Fu, only the officials of the change, there is no institutional change, fried immortal Yang Feng Yin, greedy adult bureaucratic fleas. Can not get away the path of democracy, the rule of law, the formation of each new elite group, will only exacerbate the division of Chinese politics, every political and economic interests of the dispute, will only exacerbate the corruption of Chinese officialdom.
Http://www.facebook.com/appledaily.liping

Li Ping







全國政協會議明日開幕,中國開始進入一年一度的「兩會時間」。但不同於朱鎔基、溫家寶時代,政協、人大「兩會」是總理主場,如今是「集(習)權」時代,兩會也是習近平主場。海內外報章、網絡,關注的都是習家軍上位,連會前的財經決策會議,主角也是身兼中央財經領導小組組長的習近平,遑論官方輿論頻頻為習核心造勢。
林鄭月娥在香港不得人心的原因之一是她宣佈參選後發生連串離地事件,而中共宣傳習近平是多管齊下,一是宣揚其政績,二是宣揚其得到黨政軍高層宣誓效忠,三是宣揚其「接地氣」。其中,輯錄習近平主政後在多個人大代表團講話的短片近日點擊率飆升,就因為習近平的用語平民化、接地氣。
習近平曾在湖南代表團說,扶貧要精準,「否則就是手榴彈炸跳蚤,不解決問題,看起來熱熱鬧鬧,但沒有點到穴位上」。其實,「手榴彈炸跳蚤」一句早有報道,也被其他官員廣為引用,未料如今對提升習近平接地氣的形象還有功用。只不過,再細看媒體、網絡吹捧習近平的聲勢,仍是只有手榴彈炸跳蚤的熱鬧,沒有點中中國政經問題的穴位。
中國吏治的兩大問題,一是政令不通,二是官員腐敗。這不是官員口頭宣誓效忠,也不是任人唯忠,就能解決的。眼前見到的只有習家軍搶佔山頭,新上任的國家發改委主任何立峰、商務部長鍾山、香港中聯辦副主任陳冬、京津滬渝四大直轄市的書記或市長,額頭都印着一個習字、心口印着一個勇字。其中,最勇猛的是天津市委書記李鴻忠,竟以「縱貫古今、指引方向、氣貫長虹」形容習近平的講話。
然而,殷鑑不遠。江澤民主政時,上海幫壟斷政治、經濟、文化大權,胡錦濤主政後團派勢力如日中天,何曾改變政令不出中南海、官場反貪越反越貪的局面?習家軍的上位來勢洶洶、熱熱鬧鬧,但權非民所賦,只有官員的更迭,沒有制度的轉變,炸不死陽奉陰違、貪瀆成性的官場跳蚤。走不上民主、法治的軌道,每一個新權貴集團的形成,都只會加劇中國政治的分割,每一次政經利益的紛爭,都只會加劇中國官場的腐敗。
http://www.facebook.com/appledaily.liping

李平

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170310/19953630

 The general public in Hong Kong has no vote on the election of the Chief Executive and the CPPCC, but it is not totally unaffected. In the Hong Kong people strongly opposed to the sound of Liang Zhenying and Liang Zhenying 2.0, Beijing at least to adjust the strategy, put a soft side to support the forest Zheng Yue'e's tone, no longer to appoint other candidates to threaten the election committee, Liang Zhenying as vice chairman of the CPPCC, Also said that the wind may be arranged for its inaugural time. However, both from the history of the CCP's political consultation, or from the reality of the CCP's struggle, the established political appointments have not changed, and it has been difficult to rewrite the result of the CCP's political consultation into political humiliation.

Intimidating and stimulating against Beijing's adjustment strategy

Lin announced the election at the beginning of the election on the issue of distrust, not appointed, the Hong Kong and Macao system officials and Hong Kong pro-politicians, the media has been intimidating the election, it seems that if Jun was not elected to the central appointment, Hong Kong will A constitutional crisis. But this kind of political intimidation, both to stimulate the public, the election committee of the resistance, to encourage Zeng Junhua's popularity, but also increase the outside world on Lin Zheng political stance, governance capacity of the question, so that the election to face greater pressure, The possibility of not cast Lin Zheng increased.
Hong Kong public opinion, Beijing had to adjust the strategy, by the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, the NPC "two sessions" platform to vent to reduce the negative impact of non-appointment, even Lin Zhengyue election office senior adviser, NPC deputies Zheng Yaotang also said that If any candidate is elected, the center will not be appointed. Of course, someone singing red face, some people sing black face. Xu Litai, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, stressed that the central support of Lin Zheng's attitude has not changed, the central emphasis on four conditions, is afraid of being considered hand-picked, and as a way to combat Lin Zheng.
As the Hong Kong people oppose Liang Zhenying as vice chairman of the CPPCC more vigorous, the CCP can not but not scruple Liang Zhenying once failed to withdraw from the scandal of the Australian company huge sums of money will affect the reputation of the CPPCC, once Liang Zhenying is also a national leader Increasing public opinion on the implementation of one country, two systems in Hong Kong will be detrimental to Hong Kong's implementation in China. Therefore, Beijing and the Hong Kong media to the wind, that Liang Zhenying may be postponed as vice chairman of the CPPCC National Committee, or after the election leave to the end of the first term.

Political Arranged Contradiction Reflects intense fighting

However, the CCP's policy changes have always been designed to relieve public pressure, neither to change the decision of the nomadic slave, but also to change the support of Liang Zhenying 2.0 as the chief executive of Hong Kong, to foster new slaves, and to deceive public opinion Deeper and heavier There is no political consultation on respect for public opinion. There is no relatively fair and impartial election. This will only make the trust of the Hong Kong people towards the central government and a new level of support for the Chief Executive and the SAR Government.
The election of the new chairman of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), the vice chairman of the CPPCC National Committee, should be a good opportunity for the CCP to implement political consultations and seek public support. Political consultation has provided great assistance to the construction of the CPC. At the beginning of the establishment of the CPC, a group of non-CCP members have achieved substantial power. Among the six vice-chairmen of the First Central People's Government, there are three non-communists and four vice premiers of the State Council There are two non-communist parties, the 34 ministries of the State Council by the non-communist people as the principal of the 14, but later experienced the anti-rightist movement, the Cultural Revolution, the CPPCC became the CCP's political vase, the democratic party became the CCP's vassal, political consultation into politics humiliation.
From the history of the Hong Kong people as vice chairman of the CPPCC, the Communist Party of China first appointed Anzi and Huo Yingdong as vice presidents of the CPPCC in the 1990s to reward their contribution to China and to the Hong Kong public opinion and political consultation. In 2005, in the resentment of the "foot pain" resignation of Tung Chee-hwa was appointed vice chairman of the CPPCC National Committee. The CCP would not only find him enough to ask him to step down and let him be among the leaders of the country. It was tantamount to slapping and slapping people. Liang Zhenying in the city ABC roar was abandoned, but also to promote the vice chairman of the CPPCC National Committee, so contradictory political arrangements, in addition to reflect the fierce struggle of the Chinese Communist Party, but also reflects the political consultation and then become political humiliation, The humiliation of public opinion is also a humiliation of the political wisdom of the CCP leaders.

Li Ping published Monday to Saturday




香港普羅市民對特首、政協的選舉沒有投票權,但並非完全沒有影響力。在港人強烈反對梁振英及梁振英2.0的聲浪下,北京至少要調整策略,放軟一面倒撐林鄭月娥的口風,不再以不任命其他當選人威脅選委,對梁振英出任全國政協副主席,也放風稱可能對其就職時間另作安排。但是,無論從中共政治協商的歷史看,還是從中共權鬥的現實看,既定的政治任命並未改變,也難以改寫中共把政治協商變成政治羞辱的結果。

恐嚇刺激反抗 北京調整策略

林鄭月娥宣佈參選之初就散佈不信任論、不任命論,中共港澳系統官員及香港親共政客、媒體也一直以此恐嚇選委,似乎曾俊華如果當選就得不到中央任命,香港就會出現憲政危機。但這種政治恐嚇,既刺激市民、選委的反抗情緒,助長曾俊華的民望,又加重外界對林鄭政治立場、管治能力的質疑,令選委面對更大壓力,投票時轉軚不投林鄭的可能性增加。
受香港輿論影響,北京不得不調整策略,藉全國政協、人大「兩會」平台放風,減少不任命論的負面影響,連林鄭月娥競選辦資深顧問、人大代表鄭耀棠也表示,看不到今屆有任何一名候選人當選,中央會不任命。當然,有人唱紅臉,也有人唱黑臉。全國人大常委范徐麗泰就強調,相信中央支持林鄭的態度沒變,中央強調四個條件,是怕被人認為欽點,並作為打擊林鄭的手法。
至於港人反對梁振英出任全國政協副主席的聲浪更為強烈,中共也不能不顧忌梁振英一旦未能自收取澳洲公司巨款的醜聞中脫身,將影響全國政協的聲譽,一旦梁振英身兼國家領導人加重世界輿論對香港實施一國兩制的質疑,將不利香港在中國實施一帶一路、亞投行戰略中發揮窗口功用。因此,北京又向香港媒體放風,指梁振英可能延後出任全國政協副主席,或當選後請假至特首任期結束。

政治安排矛盾 反映權鬥激烈

然而,中共的這些策略改變始終只是旨在紓緩民意壓力,既未改變獎賞家奴梁振英的決定,也未改變力撐梁振英2.0出任香港特首、扶植新家奴的決定,到頭來對民意的欺騙、羞辱更深更重。沒有尊重民意的政治協商、沒有相對公平公正的選舉,只會令港人對中央政府的信任度、對特首和特區政府的支持度刷出新低。
香港新一屆特首選舉、全國政協副主席的產生,本應是中共落實政治協商、爭取民意支持的良機。政治協商曾為中共建政提供巨大助力,在中共建政之初也令一批非中共人士取得實質權力,首屆中央人民政府六名副主席中有三名非中共人士、政務院四名副總理中有兩名非中共人士、政務院34個部委中由非中共人士擔任正職的14個,但後來經歷反右運動、文化大革命,政協成為中共的政治花瓶,民主黨派成為中共的附庸,政治協商變成政治羞辱。
從港人出任全國政協副主席的歷史看,中共1990年代首次委任安子介、霍英東為全國政協副主席,是獎賞他們對中國的貢獻,無關香港民意與政治協商。2005年,在民怨沸騰中「腳痛」請辭的董建華獲委全國政協副主席。中共既要他查找不足、要他下台,又讓他躋身國家領導人,無異於自摑又摑人。梁振英在全城ABC怒吼中被棄選,反而也能晉升全國政協副主席,如此自相矛盾的政治安排,除了反映中共權鬥之激烈外,也反映政治協商再淪為政治羞辱,是對香港民意的羞辱,也是對中共領導人政治智慧的羞辱。

李平
周一至周六刊出

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170313/19956420
 According to the agenda of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), will vote on Liang Zhenying's vice chairman of the CPPCC. Said that the vote, but Beijing has always been the election results, Liang Zhenying was elected vice chairman of the CPPCC is sure things. At that time he will be the chief executive and vice chairman of the CPPCC two positions, for such a decision, we are disappointed, sad and angry, more worried about endless trouble.

Social tearing is extremely far-reaching

What is Liang Zhenying? Liang Zhenying is a thief, the only husband, is the vast majority of Hong Kong people despise, hate the political figures. He took office in the past five years without any achievements in the implementation of the policy, the most proud of the housing policy five years down only property prices higher than the sky, the general public is difficult to afford, and public housing waiting time is extended, In any case is a failure and disappointing. The other is even worse, causing great harm to Hong Kong. It is extremely far-reaching to provoke the political struggle and the bad influence of the tornness of Hong Kong society. According to Mr. Tsang Jun-hwa's statement, the public has seen the news of rising blood pressure in the past few years. In his facebook unfriend friends, I have also met with friends for many years to make Hong Kong become Hong Kong's Hong Kong.
In addition, in order to engage in his political struggle, Mr Leung has tried to undermine the effective rules and regulations. He has made use of the low capacity "beam powder" as an important public office and took the lead in the damage procedure. Greatly faded. Like this performance should have bowed down to reduce the harm to society. Now Beijing actually let him before the fall of the national leaders, vice chairman of the CPPCC position, as if he set a major credit like what, how can it be disappointing?
Governance performance is poor, Liang Zhenying integrity, integrity is even more difficult to mention, scandal is numerous. During the election of the last special election, the storm has never been clearly explained, because the opponent also has the problem of unauthorized construction so that he muddle through, in the process of his interpretation of contradictions before and after a lot of lies, personal integrity has gone bankrupt, and he The image of "lying" is more serious affecting the credibility of the Government, weakening the trust of the public, thus greatly increasing the difficulties of governance.
To the office after the UGL scandal broke out is shocked at home and abroad, 50 million remuneration has been questioned, international and local media coverage, and the public to the ICAC for a formal complaint, the case is believed to be under investigation. Like this a good faith bankruptcy, lies numerous and scandalous political figures, this should be like South Korean President Park Jiu-hui was impeached, gray-headed face to face have to face criminal investigation. Beijing happens to be a major courtesy to him, promoted to "national leaders". How could it be angry?
The Hong Kong people are saddened that Beijing's decision shows that she does not attach much importance to the views and feelings of the people of Hong Kong. We do not care that Hong Kong people have a strong rebound on Mr Leung Ying-ying, nor are they sincerely hopeing to promote Hong Kong's social settlement. December last year Beijing to persuade Liang Zhenying not re-election chief is only tactical retreat, not to deny him and his behalf of the struggle line. On the contrary, in order to appease him and "beam powder", Beijing did not hesitate to let him become a national leader, enjoy a higher treatment and political position. It is obvious that Mr Leung's "rise" as the vice chairman of the CPPCC means that the anger of the people of Hong Kong is simply not worthy of being contaminated by Beijing. The system can be rewarded. How can it be painful!

Or change the emperor to engage in political situation

The most worrying is that Leung will use this new political position to continue his political struggle, continue to undermine Hong Kong's rules and regulations, and even turned "too emperor" pointing to Hong Kong affairs, confused political situation. Vice chairman of the CPPCC in the Chinese official position is not high, nor is it a political amulet, if the political struggle in the wrong team at any time to step down to be held criminally responsible, was former General Secretary Hu Jintao letter to the plan in the CPPCC Vice Chairman Was pulled down, and now behind bars.
Can be placed in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the CPPCC vice chairman of the location is not the same, at least in the mainland political rankings on the first high level, the influence can not be underestimated. Former chief executive Dong Jianhua to this position continue to comment on Hong Kong affairs, but also actively pull the guards, as if the shadow chief executive. Liang Zhenying's obsession with power is more than that of Tung Chee-hwa, and the loss of the chief executive is that he is not a taste, and now a runway is also a level, how can he not use the power and influence of the hand. Moreover, there are Liang Liangying around a beam of powder and soil with his first horse is looking forward to follow his command to fight. It is foreseeable that he will continue to interfere with the administration of Hong Kong and the Government in his capacity as Vice-Chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) on July 1, and will interfere with the work of the new chief executive at any time. There is such a wicked in the political system, how can Hong Kong people do not worry!

Lu Feng published Monday to Saturday


根據政協的議程,今天將就梁振英的政協副主席席位進行投票。說是投票,但北京搞的選舉向來都是預定結果的,梁振英當選政協副主席是篤定的事。到時候他將身兼特首及政協副主席兩個職位,對於這樣的決定,我們感到失望、痛心及憤怒,更擔心後患無窮。

社會撕裂影響極深遠

梁振英是甚麼人?梁振英是民賊、獨夫,是絕大部份香港市民鄙視、痛恨的政治人物。他上任近五年來施政沒有甚麼建樹,最引以為傲的房屋政策五年下來造成的只有樓價比天高,一般市民難以負擔,而公屋的輪候時間則不斷延長,這樣的房策無論如何算是失敗及令人失望。其他方面更是劣迹斑斑,對香港造成重大傷害。單是挑動政治鬥爭,造成香港社會撕裂的壞影響已是極為深遠。借特首候選人曾俊華先生的說法,過去幾年市民看新聞血壓上升,在facebook unfriend朋友,還教相識多年朋友反目,令「香港變成不像香港的香港」。
此外,梁振英為了搞他的政治鬥爭肆意破壞行之有效的規章制度,一意使用能力低下的「梁粉」擔任重要公職,又帶頭損害確當程序,令香港禮崩樂壞,原來的制度優勢及特色大為褪色。像這樣的表現早該躬身下台,減少遺害社會。現在北京居然讓他在落任前晉身國家領導人、政協副主席位置,彷彿他立下了甚麼重大功勞似的,這怎不令人失望呢?
管治成績差劣外,梁振英的誠信、操守更是不堪提,醜聞多不勝數。上屆特首選舉期間的僭建風波從來沒有清楚解釋,只因為對手同樣有僭建問題才讓他蒙混過關,可在過程中他的解釋前後矛盾,謊言一大堆,個人誠信已然破產,而他的「大話精」形象更嚴重影響政府的公信力,削弱市民的信任,從而大大增加施政的困難。
到上任後爆出的UGL醜聞更是震驚中外,五千萬酬金備受質疑,國際及本地媒體爭相報道,並有市民到廉政公署正式作投訴,案件相信正在調查中。像這樣一個誠信破產,謊言多不勝數又醜聞纏身的政治人物,本該像南韓總統朴槿惠那樣被彈劾,灰頭土臉下台還得面對刑事調查。北京偏偏對他來個重大禮遇,提升為「國家領導人」。這怎不令人憤怒?
令港人痛心的是,北京的決定表明她根本不重視港人的意見及感受,根本不理會港人對梁振英的強烈反彈,更不是真心誠意希望推動香港社會大和解。去年十二月北京勸退梁振英不連任特首只是戰術上的退卻,並不是否定他及他代表的鬥爭路線。相反,為了安撫他及「梁粉」們,北京不惜讓他成為國家領導人,享受得更高的待遇與政治位置。顯而易見,梁振英能「升呢」成為政協副主席意味港人的憤怒不滿對北京而言根本不值一哂,倒是搞亂香港的綱紀、制度可以得到獎賞。這怎不令人痛心疾首!

或變太上皇搞亂政局

最令人擔心的是,梁振英會利用這個新的政治位置繼續搞他的政治鬥爭,繼續破壞香港的規章制度,甚至變身「太上皇」對香港事務指指點點,搞亂政局。政協副主席在中國官場位置不算高,也不算甚麼政治護身符,要是在政治鬥爭中站錯隊隨時下台被追究刑責,曾是前中共總書記胡錦濤親信的令計劃就在政協副主席任內被拉下馬,現在身陷囹圄。
可放在香港這個特區來說政協副主席的位置又不一樣,至少在內地的政治排位上比特首高一級,影響力不能低估。前特首董建華就以這個位置不斷評論港事,還積極拉幫結派,儼然影子特首。梁振英對權力的迷戀比董建華有過之而無不及,失落特首之位令他大感不是味兒,現在換個跑道還官升一級,他怎麼會不盡用手上可能的權力及影響力干政。何況梁振英身邊還有一眾梁粉及土共以他馬首是瞻,跟隨他的指揮搞鬥爭。可以預見,他七月一日落任特首後將以政協副主席的身份繼續干擾港事及政府施政,隨時以香港「黨委書記」自居,干擾新特首的工作。有這樣一個禍胎在政治體系高層,港人怎能不擔心!

盧峯
周一至周六刊出

 http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20170313/19956337

 CPPCC Standing Committee nominated Liang Zhenying as vice chairman of the CPPCC candidate, and is scheduled to vote at today's meeting. CPPCC Standing Committee Chairman Chen Yongqi said that the nomination of Mr Leung was based on his contribution to Hong Kong, in particular his contribution to the end of the "campaign" and the "anti-Hong Kong independence" stand.
Liang Zhenying's greatest contribution to Hong Kong was his social torn in the class struggle of the Chinese Communist Party. The most important requirement for the new Chief Executive is to "be able to repair the social torn relationship". As for the recent establishment of the Chief Executive, the Chief Executive must be "trusted by the Central Government". The public in the polls considered the importance of only 10.3%.
Social tattoo is mainly manifested in the occupied and anti-occupied, in the yellow silk and blue silk, in the one-party dictatorship of the political reform and the implementation of Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong anti-political reform, under the power to suppress the Hong Kong people's self- Hong Kong independence ". There is no doubt that the CCP has elected Liang Zhenying as vice chairman of the CPPCC of the state leaders. He is highly appreciative of the contribution of Liang Zhenying to the implementation of the Chinese class struggle line.
It is clear that the CCP has repeatedly expressed its affirmation of Liang Zhenying, not a false statement; Liang Zhenying's refusal is not due to the CCP's dissatisfaction with his torn Hong Kong route, but because society is too loud to oppose Liang, There is not enough votes in the Election Committee, so it will be expedient to replace him to continue his administration.
Another symbol of Liang Zhenying's holding of vice chairman of the CPPCC is that the resignation of Liang may be protected by the UGL incident. No matter who elected chiefs, can not fail to worry about the investigation of national leaders. For the CCP, the UGL event is only a person's section, the real festival is the position of the class struggle. Among the top officials of the Chinese Communist Party, those who are involved in corruption are everywhere, and what is the plan of the CPPCC Vice Chairman, Su Rong? The answer is that the purpose is not anti-corruption, but the need for power struggle, that is, the need for class struggle. UGL events, absolutely do not involve the high-level struggle of the CPC, without prejudice to the class struggle. In fact, for the CCP, those who are willing to accept political and economic interests are easier to buy and use for the CCP than those who uphold the rule of law and procedural justice.
In Hong Kong, Liang Zhenying nearly five years of evil political evil lie scandal, so that he has become a street in the community of mice, he said anything, even if the truth will be considered a lie, do anything, even if the good thing Is considered a bad thing. Such a public enemy, really is rare in Hong Kong history. He served as vice chairman of the CPPCC, so that the CPPCC and the Chinese Communist Party in Hong Kong and Liang Zhenying have the same reputation. This is the historical cost of "protecting beam comrades" and maintaining past routes.
Orwell's novel "1984" divides the class of the country into three levels, the upper class is the core party member, occupies 2% of the population, the middle class is the peripheral party member, occupies 13% of the population, the lower class is the proletariat, 85%. The novel is transformed into reality, the core party members are the real party members, the peripheral party members are non-party united front object, the proletariat is enslaved. What is the core party member? Orwell said: "no more curiosity, no longer enjoy the process of life. All other fun are eliminated, only for the power of the fascination forever, and continue to enhance, constantly more and more meticulous, every moment You will feel the excitement of victory and feel the pleasure of trampling the unarmed enemy.If you want to predict the future of the world, imagine a shoe always on a face.
Nearly 70 years ago the writer for today's statues, really a bit like


Monday to Friday
Li Yi

Http://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee




全國政協常委會通過提名梁振英為政協副主席候選人,並定於今天閉幕會議上表決通過。政協常委陳永棋表示,提名梁振英是基於他對香港的貢獻,尤其是他在結束「佔中」運動中的貢獻和「反港獨」的堅定立場。
梁振英對香港最大的貢獻,是他在任內以中共的階級鬥爭為綱所造成的社會撕裂。中大民調最近所作調查,市民對新任特首最主要的要求,是期望「能夠修補社會撕裂關係」。至於近來建制派常說的特首須「得到中央信任」,在民調中市民認為重要性只佔10.3%。
社會撕裂主要表現在佔中與反佔中,在黃絲與藍絲,在一黨專政的政改與貫徹港人治港的反政改,在強權壓制下的港人自主自決意識與「反港獨」的標舉。毫無疑問,中共將梁振英推舉為國家領導人級的政協副主席,正意味高度評價梁振英執行中共階級鬥爭路線的貢獻。
由此可以知道,中共多次表示對梁振英的肯定,並非虛言;梁振英放棄連任也不是由於中共對他的撕裂香港路線不滿,而是由於社會反對梁連任的聲浪太大,以至很可能在選舉委員會中數不夠票,因此要急急換人以延續他的施政路線。
將梁振英捧為政協副主席的另一意義,是對梁下台可能因UGL事件被調查提供保護。無論誰當選特首,都不能不對調查國家領導人有所顧慮。對於中共來說,UGL事件只是一個人的小節,真正大節在於階級鬥爭中的立場。中共最高層官員中,涉貪腐者無所不在,何止也屬政協副主席的令計劃、蘇榮呢?答案就是目的並非反貪腐,而是出於權力鬥爭的需要,也就是階級鬥爭的需要。UGL事件,絕對不涉中共高層權爭,不損涉事者的階級鬥爭立場。事實上,對中共來說,願意接受政治經濟利益的人,比堅持法治和程序正義的人,較容易收買和為中共所用。
在香港,梁振英將近5年的惡政劣政謊言醜聞,使他在社會中已成過街老鼠,他說的任何話,即使真話也會被認為是假話,做的任何事,即使好事也被認為是壞事。這樣的市民公敵,還真是香港歷史少見。將他捧為政協副主席,使政協以至中共在香港都擁有與梁振英相同的名聲。這是「保護梁同志」和維護過去路線的歷史代價。
奧威爾的小說《1984》將大洋國的階級分為三層,上等階級是核心黨員,佔人口2%,中等階級是外圍黨員,佔人口13%,下等階級是無產階級,佔人口85%。小說轉換成現實,核心黨員即現實的黨員,外圍黨員即非黨的統戰對象,無產階級就是被奴役的蟻民。核心黨員會是怎樣的人呢?奧威爾說:「不再有好奇心,不再享受生命的過程。一切其他樂趣都被消滅,只有對於權力的迷醉永遠存在,而且不斷地增強,不斷地越來越細緻,每時每刻都將感受到勝利的興奮,感受到踐踏手無寸鐵的敵人的快感。你如果想要預知未來世界的面目,想像一隻皮鞋永遠踩在一張人臉上。」
將近70年前的作家為今人造像,還真有點似。
周一至周五刊出
李怡

http://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee

 ===

 https://twitter.com/search?q=%23FuckTrump&src=typd


#FuckTrump





   #FuckTrump ,  #NotMyPresident ,  #fuckrussia , #LiArPotusTrump ,  #TheResistance, ...."I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, What your  #FuckingLies ,  #FuckTrump !  #Amonymous ,  #AnonFamily  .




 *-Update [15-03-2017] accumulation in Google Great God's favorite page - Apple Daily wonderful article, not a long time to teach my blog back, after all, also to my dear 'Google Great God' homes lay down my heart the most painful sour a feeling of. 'Li Yi' Mr. meaningful article, 'Mr. Li Ping' realistic comments, Apple Daily is the Oriental conscience newspaper, as we 'Great America' New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNNews, MSNews. & BBCNews. - Do not forget 'conscience and morality' so that we recognize black and white and authenticity.
so,  #FuckTrump ,  #NotMyPresident ,  #fuckrussia , #LiArPotusTrump ,  #TheResistance, ...."I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, What your  #FuckingLies ,  #FuckTrump !  #Amonymous ,  #AnonFamily  .

http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html








At Least 50 Trump Electors Were Illegitimately Seated as Electoral College Members

More evidence surfaces as calls mount to challenge congressional ratification of Electoral College vote.

That stunning finding is among the conclusions of an extensive 1,000-plus page legal briefing prepared by a bipartisan nationwide legal team for members of Congress who are being urged to object to certifying the 2016 Electoral College results on Friday.

“Trump’s ascension to the presidency is completely illegitimate,” said Ryan Clayton of Americans Take Action, who is promoting the effort. “It’s not just Russians hacking our democracy. It’s not just voter suppression at unprecedented levels. It is also [that] there are Republicans illegally casting ballots in the Electoral College, and in a sufficient number that the results of the Electoral College proceedings are illegitimate as well.”

“Republicans like to talk all the time about people voting illegally,” Clayton continued. “We have a list of a bunch of Republicans that allegedly voted illegally in the Electoral College. Pam Bondi is the attorney general of the state of Florida and the Florida Constitution says that you cannot hold two offices. And she holds the office of Attorney General and she holds the office of federal elector in the Electoral College. That is a violation of the law. That is a violation of the Constitution. And the vote that she cast in this election is illegal.”
A joint congressional session is scheduled to ratify the 2016 Electoral College vote this Friday. While there have been calls to challenge that certification—including one women-led effort saying Trump's victory is due to voter suppression targeting people of color—the analysis that scores of Trump electors were illegally seated, and the additional finding that most states won by Trump improperly filed their Electoral College "Certificates of Vote" with Congress, is unprecedented.

Their research and report grew out of the legal activities surrounding the December 19 Electoral College meeting, where Clayton and others urged Republican electors to reject Trump saying they had a constitutional responsibility to pick a more qualified president.
Clayton is hoping that sufficient numbers of Republicans in Congress will not vote to ratify the Electoral College results, thus depriving Trump of the 270 Electoral College votes he needs to win the presidency. If that transpires, the House would then decide between the three top Electoral College vote-getters—Trump, Hillary Clinton and Colin Powell, he said. (Colin Powell got several electoral college votes—write-ins—while Gary Johnson got none. The Powell votes were from the Democratic electors academics call "faithless electors.")
But before any of that can happen, there needs to be a formal challenge to ratifying the 2016 Electoral College results in Friday’s joint session of Congress, which is where the research finding that scores of Trump votes were illegally cast comes in.

“We have reason to believe that there are at least 50 electoral votes that were not regularly given or not lawfully certified (16 Congressional District violations and 34 Dual Office-Holder violations),” the executive summary of the Electoral Vote Objection Packet said. “The number could be over a hundred. We urge you to prepare written objections for January 6.”

“The compiling of the laws and evidence in this Electoral Vote Objection Package was completed by a national team of roughly 15 pro bono attorneys, law students, and legal assistants who represent no client or entity,” the summary said. “We are non-partisan—Democrat, Republican, and Independent. We live in different parts of the country, urban and rural, red states and blue states.”
Challenging the Electoral College
The Electoral College’s results have only been challenged twice since 1877. The most recent was in 2005, when an objection to Ohio’s Electoral College votes was filed by Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, D-OH, and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-CA. While that effort did not stop President George W. Bush's reelection, it did force both chambers of Congress to debate for two hours before the Electoral College vote was ratified. Tubbs-Jones and Boxer used the podium to rail against GOP efforts to suppress the vote and disqualify ballots in communities of color.

The process for challenging the Electoral College vote is two-fold. First, a House member has to file a formal challenge and objection. Then one House member and one senator have to sign on, prompting each body to retire to their chambers for the two-hour debate.
The Electoral Vote Objection Packet briefing cites two main areas where 2016 Electoral College members were illegally seated and a third where their votes electing Trump were improperly sent to Congress.

“Specifically, at least 16 electors lived outside the congressional districts they represented in violation of state statutory residency requirements, and at least 34 electors held dual offices, in direct violation of statutes prohibiting dual-office holding,” the briefing's executive summary says, noting this violates two sections of the U.S. Constitution.

The first group of illegitimate electors amounts to political carpetbagging. “In North Carolina, for instance,” the briefing says, a state law, “NCGS 163-1(c) states, ‘One presidential elector shall be nominated from each congressional district…’ Yet, we have voter registration cards showing that numerous North Carolina electors lived outside the congressional districts they represented.”
The report lists the following states and their number of illegitimate electors: Arkansas (two from outside its congressional district); Indiana (one), Louisiana (one), Michigan (one), North Carolina (seven), Oklahoma (one), and Texas (three).
The second group of illegitimate electors is based on the fact that presidential electors hold a federal office, however short-lived, and that directly conflicts with states that ban elected officials from holding more than one office at a time. Florida’s state constitution, for example, bars dual-office holding. Its Supreme Court has issued rulings that further define what constitutes an officeholder. And the state legislature has passed other laws treating them as public officials, such as reimbursing them for travel costs.

“Ironically, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has issued a number of Advisory Legal Opinions on dual-office holding, was a presidential elector,” the briefing said. “Her name was on the Governor’s certification list of Republican electors, and also Attorney General Bondi cast her electoral ballot on December 19. Joe Negron, who also cast an electoral vote, is currently president of the Florida Senate.”

The report lists the following states and their number of illegitimate electors based on dual-office holders: Alabama (two), Florida (12), Georgia (four), Iowa (two), Kansas (four), Kentucky (one), Michigan (one), Missouri (one), Nebraska (one), North Carolina (one), Ohio (one), Oklahoma (two), Pennsylvania (two), South Carolina (one), South Dakota (three), Tennessee (two), Texas (four), Utah (one), and West Virginia (three). This tally, which adds up to 49 electors, was taken from a spreadsheet accompanying the briefing and is a larger number than what was cited in the report’s executive summary, which is quoted above.

Finally, there is another area of concern. Apparently, 23 states—out of the 31 that cast Electoral College votes for Trump—did not properly report separate vote counts for president and vice-president to Congress. That violates the 12th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and a federal law requiring presidential electors in each state to “provide ‘two distinct lists of votes,’ one for the president and the other for the Vice President,” the briefing said. “Of 31 states, only eight states followed that law," the report said. "Some states codify the federal law into their own state law regarding presidential electors. Of those, 15 states did not provide two lists of signatures on their Certificates of Vote.”
“We are not providing any legal advice,” the briefing’s disclaimer says. “We strongly suggest that members of Congress employ their own legal teams to verify our work.”

It may be that the efforts to convince Congress to challenge the ratification of the 2016 Electoral College amounts to little more than a Hail Mary aimed at derailing a Trump presidency. As of late Wednesday, Clayton thought there would be House members willing to object to certifying the Electoral College vote, but he was less certain about finding a senator willing to go along.

But even if a challenge is mounted and fails, it underscores the illegitimate basis of Trump’s presidency and the deep opposition to it, and refutes the GOP’s outrageous claim that it has a mandate for dismantling government programs across the board.
“We have a list of 50 illegal electors,” Clayton said. “That puts Donald Trump below the threshold that he needs to be elected president. Let’s debate it in an open session. According to the Constitution, the Congress, if nobody wins on the first round of balloting, picks from the top three candidates. That will be Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Colin Powell.”
Steven Rosenfeld covers national political issues for AlterNet, including America's democracy and voting rights, campaigns and elections, and many social justice issues. He is the author of "Count My Vote: A Citizen's Guide to Voting" (AlterNet Books, 2008).

 ===
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/09/meryl-streep-was-right-donald-trump-did-mock-a-disabled-reporter/?utm_term=.8fe4c57e8306 


Meryl Streep was right. Donald Trump did mock a disabled reporter.

 
 President-elect Donald Trump fired back at Meryl Streep Monday morning after the actress denounced his campaign rhetoric during a speech at the Golden Globe Awards Sunday night. Streep ripped Trump for his obvious mockery of a journalist's physical disability in late 2015, and Trump responded by once again denying that he meant to make fun of the reporter's condition.
This was Streep's commentary:
An actor's only job is to enter the lives of people who are different from us and let you feel what that feels like, and there were many, many, many powerful performances this year that did exactly that, breathtaking, compassionate work.
But there was one performance this year that stunned me. It sank its hook in my heart not because it was good. It was — there was nothing good about it, but it was effective, and it did its job. It made its intended audience laugh and show their teeth. It was that moment when the person asking to sit in the most respected seat in our country imitated a disabled reporter, someone he outranked in privilege, power, and the capacity to fight back.
It kind of broke my heart, and I saw it, and I still can't get it out of my head because it wasn't in a movie. It was real life. And this instinct to humiliate when it's modeled by someone in the public platform by someone powerful, it filters down into everybody's life because it kind of gives permission for other people to do the same thing.
And this was Trump's answer:
Trump has previously claimed he was not aware that the reporter, Serge Kovaleski of the New York Times, has an impairment that visibly affects the flexibility and movement of his arms. The billionaire says that when he singled out Kovaleski for ridicule during a rally in South Carolina — "You've got to see this guy," he said, before jerking his arms spastically — he did not intend to call attention to Kovaleski's disability, arthrogryposis.
"I was never mocking anyone," Trump told the Times on Monday. "I was calling into question a reporter who had gotten nervous because he had changed his story. People keep saying I intended to mock the reporter's disability, as if Meryl Streep and others could read my mind, and I did no such thing."

 As I've written before, Trump's defense simply isn't believable. Kovaleski, who covered Trump long before the real estate mogul entered politics, has said that "Donald and I were on a first-name basis for years." Trump was undoubtedly aware of Kovaleski's disability.
Trump apologists such as Ann Coulter have claimed that he has mocked other, non-disabled people in exactly the same fashion — supposedly proving that he was not imitating Kovaleski — but their assertions are not supported by video evidence (more on that here ). Trump's impression of Kovaleski was unique and clearly specific to him.
This is Kovaleski, on the right:




 Exactly. There is no doubt.
Also, Trump's charge that Kovaleski "changed his story" is not accurate. Trump was referring to coverage of his own, false claim that on Sept. 11, 2001, he "watched in Jersey City, NJ, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as [the World Trade Center] was coming down."

Kovaleski, then at The Washington Post, wrote a week after the 9/11 attacks that "law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river."
When Trump said during the presidential campaign that he watched thousands of people celebrate, Kovaleski disputed the claim: "I certainly do not remember anyone saying that thousands or even hundreds of people were celebrating. That was not the case, as best as I can remember."

As The Post's Fact Checker noted, there is no inconsistency between Kovaleski's reporting in 2001 and his statement in 2015:
    Of course, “a number of people” obviously does not equal “thousands” — and “allegedly” indicates there is no video footage or other proof that celebrations actually took place. Recall that Trump claimed he saw this on television — and that it was “well covered at the time.” This newspaper article appeared days later.
Trump can complain about Streep's speech all he wants, but she was right about his cruel treatment of Kovaleski. And Trump was wrong about Kovaleski's reporting.   ''

 ===
 http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/8/1618252/-Here-Were-McConnell-s-Requirements-For-Obama-s-Nominees









The head of Office of Government Ethics, the federal agency charged with investigating the backgrounds of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees, told Senate Democrats on Saturday that the process of vetting Trump’s picks is overwhelming the agency. Director Walter Shaub Jr. also emphasized his concern that Republicans are pushing forward with confirmation hearings for Trump’s nominees before the appropriate paperwork has been completed, and thus before the OGE can confirm that the nominees have no financial, ethical, or criminal red flags.

The Hypocrisy and strong arm tactics of the Grand Ole Fascist party are a direct threat to our democracy.  The GOF has learned well from Trump that you can lie to the public, the media will simply publish your lie in a headline, and the public’s biggest concern will be, who’s on dancing with the stars tonight.
Resist!
UPDATE:  Damn! You people are good!  I can’t believe how many comments from people who have already contacted their Senators!  Resistance is NOT futile!

 ===
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/01/08/trump-reaction-russia-hacking-report-way-off-sinister-max-boot-column/96312650/ 


Trump is way off on Russia hack report: Max Boot

 Published 9:10 a.m. ET Jan. 8, 2017.

His reaction suggests a guilty conscience and the possibility that something sinister is going on.

In the normal course of business, it’s hard to get America’s fractious intelligence agencies to agree that 2 + 2 = 4. So the unclassified version of the intelligence community assessment about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee is all the more remarkable. In it, the FBI, the CIA and the NSA wrote with "high confidence" (itself rare in the intelligence world) that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election,” and two of three agencies had high confidence it was to help President-elect Donald Trump.
Yes, the intelligence community has made mistakes in the past, most notoriously regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. But in this case, it is obvious the spies have such a  high degree of proof — including, one suspects, electronic intercepts of conversations and human intelligence reports to go along with forensic investigation of the hacked computers — that there is no disputing their bottom line.
Even Trump, who has consistently refused to admit that the DNC was hacked by the Russians rather than by some 400-pound couch potato, felt compelled to issue a statement after receiving the classified version of the assessment that did not doubt its conclusions. And yet even then he would not admit that the culprit was solely Russia. His statement referred not only to Russia but also to “China, other countries, outside groups and people” that “are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations, including the Democratic National Committee.” He’s right that China and other states consistently engage in cyber espionage, but Russia is unique for leaking emails in order to influence the outcome of an American election.
Trump’s statement further claimed, “There was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election, including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”
It’s true there was no tampering with voting machines, but how can Trump state so confidently that the Russian hack had “no effect” on the outcome of an election that was decided by 80,000 people in three states? If the hack was so inconsequential, why did Trump hype the resulting information — about how the DNC supposedly favored Hillary Clinton in the primaries — to try to persuade Bernie Sanders' supporters not to vote for Clinton in the general election? Why did he constantly bring up WikiLeaks in the final month of the campaign and say the group had “done a job" on Clinton?
One suspects Trump of a guilty conscience given that within hours, he was back to blaming the victims rather than perpetrators for the hack. “Gross negligence by the Democratic National Committee allowed hacking to take place,” he tweeted. As investment manager Patrick Chovanec quipped: “This is like G. Gordon Liddy saying DNC should have installed better locks.”

Trump has often expressed admiration for Putin and never criticized him. Recently, for example, he tweeted his congratulations — “Great move on delay (by V. Putin) — I always knew he was very smart!” — when the Russian strongman refused to react in kind to President Obama’s expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats in retaliation for the Russian hacking.
That pattern did not change even after the release of the damning intelligence community report. Trump had not one word of disapprobation for the Russian meddling in our election. Instead, he tweeted: “Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Only ‘stupid’ people, or fools, would think that it is bad!”

In truth, no American wants a bad relationship with Russia. But many of us have concluded that a good relationship is impossible until Putin stops invading neighboring countries (Georgia, Ukraine), stops committing war crimes (Syria), and stops trying to undermine Western institutions — something he is doing not only in the U.S. but across Western Europe with his support of extremist parties, such as the National Front in France and even coup plotters in Montenegro.
POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media
Trump, however, doesn’t offer the slightest objection to Russia’s egregious misconduct, and that in turn raises the question: Why not? Is it simply admiration for the Russian dictator on the part of a president-elect who has said that Putin’s Russia is “hot stuff,” and that “what he’s done for Russia is really amazing”? Or is there something more sinister going on?
The New York Times has just published a damning investigation showing the extent to which Jared Kushner, Trump’s consigliere and son-in-law, is heavily dependent on shadowy Chinese and Russian financiers closely linked to their governments. Might the Trump Organization be equally compromised? We have no way of knowing because Trump is so opaque about his finances. But his adherence to a slavishly pro-Putin line, if it continues in office, will certainly raise such suspicions.

 ===
 https://twitter.com/hashtag/FuckTrump?src=hash
 #FuckTrump  ,,  #YouNotMyPresident  ,,  #Fuck_KKK  ,,  #FuckPutin  ,,  #OpRussia  ,,  #OpChina  ,,  #OpHongKongDAB  ,,  #Anonymous  ,,  #Hastings  .
------------



 ===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20170114/19896763 


 A man's romance can sometimes make people cry, saying that US President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden's friendship, in recognition of the contribution of partners in the past eight years, Obama deliberately planned a surprise the day before yesterday, to Biden awarded the highest honor of civilians "Distinguished President of the Medal of Freedom," Biden moved in public shed tears of men.
Eight years relative day and night, Obama and Biden tacit understanding between the full interaction with the eyes, long been Internet users holding a perfect match "hehe". As Barack Obama said at a press conference the day before yesterday, "This is the last chance for netizens to talk about our men's romance again." Biden prior to Obama do not know to praise him, but also thought that only to participate in the White House general reception, the audience was surprised to see a public friends and relatives, colleagues and other familiar faces, seemed a little overwhelmed.
 
"He's the best vice president in the US, Biden," Biden scowled as he listened to Barack Obama's accolades and guests' cheers. Obama said he had never questioned Biden's decision for eight years, thanked him for making him a better president, and working for the White House. "Understanding Biden's understanding of true love, selfless dedication and life ..." I am pleased to present him with the highest honor of the civilian population, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and his distinguished title. " In the past, the first three US presidents have each awarded the Distinguished Presidential Medal of Freedom to only one person, and this is the first time that President Barack Obama has presented the award.

His speech was ashamed

Biden, who had been in tears for a long time, could not restrain himself. "Oh," he said, turning to the back and taking his handkerchief and wiping his tears. In his speech, Biden admitted that he was "ashamed" and thanked Obama for treating him in public and private affairs. In particular, the death of the brain of Beau Biden, the eldest son of the year before yesterday, Obama offered to lend money to Boao 's widow, "I will owe you and your family too much ... as long as I survived, I will support you and your family ... ... I hope that the history of the President to evaluate the time to By referring to my name, I take a part in the journey of extraordinary things for the country. "
Associated Press / British "Daily Mail"

 ===







男人的浪漫有時可賺人熱淚,說的是美國總統奧巴馬跟副總統拜登的情誼,為表揚拍檔八年來的貢獻,奧巴馬前天特意策劃一場驚喜記者會,向拜登頒授平民最高榮譽的「傑出總統自由勳章」,拜登感動得當眾灑下男兒淚。
八年來朝夕相對,奧巴馬跟拜登之間默契十足的互動跟眼神交流,早被網民捧成絕配「hehe」。正如奧巴馬前天在記者會上說,「這是讓網友再次談論我們之間男人的浪漫(bromance)最後機會」。拜登事前不知奧巴馬要表揚他,還以為只是參加白宮普通酒會,進場卻見一眾嘉賓有親友、同事等熟悉臉孔,顯得有點不知所措。
「他是美國從未有過的最佳副總統,拜登。」聽着奧巴馬的讚譽與嘉賓們的熱烈歡呼,拜登難為情地低頭搔搔眉。奧巴馬指八年來從沒質疑過找拜登做副手的決定,感謝對方讓他成為更好總統,亦令白宮上下和諧共事,「了解拜登就是了解真摯的愛、無私奉獻及活出人生……我很高興在此向他頒授平民最高榮譽,總統自由勳章,配以傑出銜頭」。過去前三位美國總統各自僅向一人頒授過「傑出總統自由勳章」,今次亦是奧巴馬首次頒發這項殊榮。

致辭稱愧不敢當

一直熱淚盈眶的拜登此時再也按捺不住,「噢」一聲轉身背台拿出手帕拭淚,邊深呼吸邊接受嘉許。致辭時拜登坦言「愧不敢當」,感謝奧巴馬在公在私都待他以善,特別是前年長子博歐(Beau Biden)腦癌離世,奧巴馬主動提出借錢助博歐遺孀度過難關,令拜登不至於要賣屋幫補,「總統先生,我欠你及欠你的家人實在太多……只要我一息尚存,我都會支持你跟你的家人……我希望歷史評價這位總統時能提到我的名字,我在這位非凡人物替國家幹非凡大事的旅程中佔一部份」。
美聯社/英國《每日郵報》

 ===
 share the< HKDSE CHEMISTRY A Modern View- Examination Survival Guide 1 >-( it is about $500HKD of this Exam set book)-




























































































































 ===

-[26-10-2017](Hong Kong TV) {Chen Zhanpeng - Ruco Chan} to see the story of life, encourage - people wake up to see so diverse theme, very moved!
Worthy of praise!

 http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html

 [08/04/2017]Update -see the nice guy "NowThis" push this msg on the twitter
My tears is following down, sadly...
((  #WhatTheFuckingNaziTrumpdidb4
#NoWar
#NoBanNoWall
#HumanRights
#Anonymous
#ObamaAgain  ))-

 http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html

-Update[20/03/2017]Hong Kong ppls wants a “Head of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”=“Mother wrote a letter to the for *Zeng Junhu*- oneof specifically Leader ” with the HK citizen to have a *political dreams*...~"
 http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html
see these 2days what happen in the Google news & twitter, and apple daily news :"Trump once refused to shake hands embarrassing Merkel visited the United States was cold to be"-the fact !!! #FuckTrump-
http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html 
*"Today, Poland tomorrow, USA"
Scholars warn that populism can erode democracy - from
 ( hk.apple.nextmedia.com ) - you can see that why i very like this media, it's show the truth!~

http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html 
-Update [15-03-2017] accumulation in Google Great God's favorite page - Apple Daily wonderful article, not a long time to teach my blog back, after all, also to my dear 'Google Great God' homes lay down my heart the most painful sour a feeling of. 'Li Yi' Mr. meaningful article, 'Mr. Li Ping' realistic comments, Apple Daily is the Oriental conscience newspaper, as we 'Great America' New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNNews, MSNews. & BBCNews. - Do not forget 'conscience and morality' so that we recognize black and white and authenticity.
so,  #FuckTrump ,  #NotMyPresident ,  #fuckrussia , #LiArPotusTrump ,  #TheResistance, ...."I must go to tell you, you cant stop me to writter on our Great god Google of Blogger.net., You're the begger stolen our country citizens tax / pay, What your  #FuckingLies ,  #FuckTrump !  #Amonymous ,  #AnonFamily  .

http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html 
-Update[13/01-2017 ]-From twitter: "Talia"-At least 50 Trump electors were not eligible to be electors. (304-50=254) Not enough, Donald!'' and from ''washingtonpost.com/news''-Meryl Streep was right. Donald Trump did mock a disabled reporter.[By Callum Borchers January 9]- and from "dailykos.com"- "
Here Were McConnell's Requirements For Obama's Nominees.[By pollwatcher,Sunday Jan 08, 2017]- and from "http://hacker-bot.tumblr.com/post"-"Trump is way off on Russia hack report: Max Boot"="His reaction suggests a guilty conscience and the possibility that something sinister is going on." 
#FuckTrump  ,,  #YouNotMyPresident  ,,  #Fuck_KKK  ,,  #FuckPutin  ,,  #OpRussia  ,,  #OpChina  ,,  #OpHongKongDAB  ,,  #Anonymous  ,,  #Hastings  .
------------
And share the< HKDSE CHEMISTRY A Modern View- Examination Survival Guide 1 >-( it is about $500HKD of this Exam set book)-

http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2017/01/update1301-2017-from-twitter-talia-at.html 
 ===Melody===THE...ANGER===>/