always gives us a lot of good information to
do our search toolbar the" favorites function '' leave so much...!'- Is who ' brother' gave us to share??!-
CHEMTrail Plane Shot Down Above ChinaMon Mar 05, 2012 .
We
have a further report from the China National Automotive determination,
because we can read: "June 26 suspicious plane was forced to land an
American military operations AN-124 civillian, then triggered a response
in the Indian Air Force into Pakistan airspace change. its call sign, the aircraft was forced to land in Mumbai while the
second Nigerian figther aircraft forced down also arrested the crew.It is reported that China (China's People's Liberation Army Air Force)
exposure to these beautiful presence, Ukraine, India and Nigeria,
aircraft operation among intelligence officials more and more attention,
Communication "biological agents" in the Earth's atmosphere is also
believed by some Chinese style spread of H1N1 swine flu attempt
large-scale genocide.About
these reports and arrests, and forced the plane down and strange things
is that these aircraft are equipped with the "waste disposal" system
that can spray up from the nanotubes mature network, resulting in the
45,000 kilograms or air-type mist 100pounds trailing wings, thereby whether it is dispersed in these tanks through the edge of the fog."The aircraft have been reported in Ukraine report as well, because we
can further read:" The town authorities in Kiev, Ukraine refused any
over spray "aerosolized medication" aircraft in the city.
After
that, reportedly, light aircraft, flying to see an aerosol spray
material against the H1N1 or swine flu forest areas of the market. 5 Sources confirms this and Kiev local newspapers also received
hundreds of calls of residents near the suspicious plane was spraying
the field of material business owners.Moreover, local businesses and retailers were "advised" period, to stay indoors by the local government today. If that was not enough, the government authorities also pushed the radio denied reports in Kiev. Online forums, websites and blog reports came in about confirms this eyewitness account.Helicopter spraying has also been reported in Kiev, Lviv, Ternopil and throughout Ukraine aerosols. "The
most disturbing impact of this variant swine flu virus in Ukraine
sprayed devastating toll has taken the country's people, and we can
read:" Since yesterday, nearly 40 million people are infected by what we
in Ukraine still
called the "plague of Ukraine", but doctors said recently, which is
already mutated, and has H1N1 or swine flu under stronger case, it
destroys the lungs and affect the lungs fill it with blood. "However, the most dire consequences of this variation swine flu virus is now reported that the World Health Organization,This is killing people in France, Norway, Brazil, Japan, Mexico,
Ukraine and the United States, became the global pandemic, the death
toll is now reported to have been close to 8,000,
And China now report that the deadly disease has now crossed into dogs.It
is also important to note that these reports is to shoot down aircraft
spray reportedly located for Kyrgyzstan and other Central Asian
countries, of which there are many Ashkenazi Jews (Ashkenazi Jews make
up about 80 percent of the world's secret base in Israel) think their
"spiritual home" of communist rule in the Soviet Union after their long
exile themselves and the Russian Intelligence analysts report the
Israelis are approaching their decades of ancient manuscripts Manas epic
(approaching the end of five hundred thousand lines long decryption
Mana long
Odyssey and Iliad twenty times Sibihema combination), they believe
contains our world's oldest warning, our current age (coincidence?) have
the ancient Mayan people agree that 2012 will see we are now to the end of age.The
end result of these events are not in our understanding; in addition to
self-evident, that the truth of these things is to continue to be
ignored, even ridiculed, by the very human extinction has been eager to
these monsters plans currently being carried out, who still do not any know how really good it has become their propaganda controlled by their masters. One can only hope that they wake up before all is lost for them, the fact that they will not.CHEMTrail飛機擊落在中國之上
Mon Mar 05, 2012 .
攜帶用於空中噴灑一種“突變”豬流感病毒的貨物是由什麼是一個破壞者隊在中國的上海浦東國際機場擊落.
認為是以色列摩薩德士兵試圖阻止時的位於吉爾吉斯斯坦等中亞國家的中亞基地之一.
形容為“流行病學研究和主要中心在病毒性出血熱，流感，腦炎和立克次體“，這機構的負責人，戴維·洛克菲勒，長期呼籲在我們的世界人口大幅減少的實驗室研究。和議程目前正在通過其人口的大規模死亡從根本上改變我們的世界，
我們有來自中國的進一步報告國家汽車決心，因為我們可以讀到：“6月26日可疑飛機被迫降落。一位美國運營AN-124 civillian軍事，然後引發了印度空軍在進入巴基斯坦領空的響應改變了它的呼號，飛機被迫在孟買降落，而第二個被迫下降尼日利亞figther飛機也被逮捕船員。據報導中國（中國的解放軍空軍）接觸這些美的存在，印度和尼日利亞情報官員操作的烏克蘭飛機之中越來越多的關注，
在地球大氣層中傳播“生物製劑”也是一些中國風貌相信是通過H1N1豬流感蔓延的企圖大規模種族滅絕。
有關這些報告和逮捕以及奇怪的事情迫使飛機下來是，這些飛機是搭載“廢物處理”系統，可以噴上去，從納米管的成熟的網絡，導致整個45000千克或空中型霧氣100pounds尾隨的翅膀，從而分散無論是在這些坦克通過霧的邊緣。
“這架飛機在烏克蘭的報告已經報導為好，因為我們可以進一步閱讀：”在基輔的鎮機關，烏克蘭拒絕任何噴塗“霧化藥物”飛機在城市上空。
這之後，據報導，輕型飛機，看到飛過的噴了氣霧劑物質對抗H1N1或豬流感林的市場領域。 5來源證實了這一點和基輔的當地報紙也收到了數百個電話的居民，靠近飛機被噴塗可疑物質領域的企業主。
不僅如此，當地企業和零售商進行“勸”期間，由當地政府當天留在室內。如果這還不夠，政府主管部門也推在基輔電台否認報告。在線上論壇，網站和博客報導排在有關證實了這一點目擊者帳戶。
也有報導直升機噴灑在基輔，利沃夫，捷爾諾波爾和整個烏克蘭氣溶膠。“最令人不安的這種變異豬流感病毒在烏克蘭噴塗的影響是毀滅性的人數已採取了國家的人民，並且我們可以讀到：“從昨天起，近40萬人受到感染烏克蘭由什麼我們仍然稱之為”烏克蘭瘟疫“，但醫生們日前表示，這是已經發生突變，並具有H1N1或豬流感有更強的情況下，對肺影響它破壞肺和血液填充它。“但是，這種變異的豬流感病毒的最可怕的結果是世界衛生組織現在報告說，
這是殺了人在法國，挪威，巴西，日本，墨西哥，烏克蘭和美國，成為這一全球大流行，死亡人數現報已經接近8000，
而中國現在報告說，這種致命的疾病現在已經越過成狗。重要的是還注意到這些報告的是，擊落噴霧飛機據報導，針對位於吉爾吉斯斯坦等中亞國家，其中有不少德系猶太人（德系猶太人彌補猶太人全世界大約80％的秘密以色列基地）認為他們的“精神家園”在蘇聯共產黨統治他們長期流亡自己後，並在俄羅斯情報分析員報告以色列人正在接近其幾十年的馬納斯稿件的古代史詩（接近長解密年底五十萬行瑪納斯比荷馬的奧德賽長二十倍和伊利亞特組合），他們認為包含了我們的世界上最古老的警告，我們目前的年齡和（巧合？）有古老的瑪雅人民同意，2012年將看到我們現在的結局年齡。
這些事件的最終結果是不是在我們的認識;除了不言自明的，那這些東西的真理是繼續被忽視，甚至嘲笑，由非常人的滅絕已經渴望通過這些怪物的計劃，目前正進行的，誰仍然不知道任何如何真正好用它已成為他們通過他們的宣傳主人進行控制。人們只能希望，他們喚醒之前一切都失去了對他們來說，事實表明，他們不會。
===
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-fay/uyghur-human-rights-proje_b_9266852.html
(Above: Uyghurs protest at the Embassy of China in Washington, DC on February 5, 2016).
Uyghurs across the world, except in China, joined in protest on February 5, 2016, to commemorate the 19th anniversary of the Ghulja massacre. The incident took place in the city of Ghulja, near the Kazakh border in the northwestern part of East Turkestan, the Uyghur homeland which is situated in northwestern China. On February 5, 1997, Uyghurs in Ghulja organized a peaceful protest against religious restrictions enacted by the Chinese state. Chinese police violently put down their protest. Shockingly, authorities penned demonstrators into a stadium and hosed them with water, causing frostbite. The winter chill in Washington, DC reminded those activists who assembled of this painful past.
China's crackdown on Uyghurs in Ghulja after the 1997 incident utilized arbitrary imprisonment, torture in detention, and unfair trials, based on reports from human rights groups; and several Uyghurs were executed for their alleged role in the protests. In addition, China strictly embargoed any information about the incident, prosecuting rights defenders who attempted to investigate, which has clearly emerged as the state's standard response to incidents in East Turkestan since. Nearly two decades later, Uyghurs continue to call for an independent investigation, and seek an accounting for the Uyghurs killed, arrested and disappeared.
Abdurazzak Shamseden is an innocent man who found himself swept up in the aftermath of the Ghulja massacre. He was detained not for participation in the demonstration itself; rather, after his nephew was killed in a skirmish with police, Abdurazzak was detained in reprisal for his tragic family connection. A young farmer awaiting marriage and in the prime of his life, Abdurazzak was sentenced to life imprisonment. On Human Rights Day last December, the Washington, DC-based Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) launched a petition to release eight political prisoners, including Abdurazzak. Abdurazzak's sister works for UHRP, fighting tirelessly to defend her people's human rights and protect other families targeted by the Chinese state like her own.
UHRP's petition has achieved some success already. Chinese authorities announced in February 2016 that Huseyin Celil, a Uyghur political prisoner who has been held in prison for a decade in spite of his Canadian citizenship, will have his 15-year sentence commuted by 6 months. State media withheld further details, which fits the Chinese state's non-transparent approach to nearly all of the prisoners in the petition. Nor is the reduction a result of an appeal or judicial procedure, highlighting the weakness of China's rule of law. It is thus a bittersweet celebration. Advocacy on his behalf is more critical now than ever.
Celil, a preacher imprisoned for purely political reasons, was convicted as part of China's anti-terrorism campaign, which Chinese authorities codified into new legislation in 2016, with possibly devastating consequences for Uyghurs. A recent UHRP report examines the law's potential to lead to human rights abuses. UHRP Director, Alim Seytoff said: "The law will not ensure the security of the people of East Turkestan and will only increase tensions through the criminalization of legitimate activities. It will serve to further alienate and marginalize the Uyghurs. I fear the region is headed toward a descent into further repression. That the Chinese government is preparing for these human rights abuses to happen in an information void is even more disturbing."
The information void enforced by the law refers to criminalization of information related to "terrorism," which the legislation loosely defines to include any anti-state activities. China has a history of using anti-state charges to crackdown on free speech and rights related reporting. In fact, five of the political prisoners included in UHRP's petition were journalists or citizen journalists. China handed its harshest sentence of all to Ilham Tohti, a Uyghur scholar who ran a Mandarin language website to promote dialogue between Han Chinese (the ethnic majority in China) and Uyghurs. In 2014, Ilham Tohti was sentenced to life imprisonment and seven volunteers for the site were also imprisoned for 3-8 years, including three in the petition: Mutellip Imin, Atikem Rozi and Akbar Imin.
Journalist Gheyret Niyaz, another petition case, was also imprisoned simply for running a website. Niyaz was rounded up after unrest in East Turkestan in July 2009. Uyghurs in Urumchi, the regional capital, assembled on July 5, 2009 to call for an investigation into the murders of several Uyghur factory workers in the Pearl River Delta region. Police cracked down on the protest, and once again, the state responded with extrajudicial killings and widespread disappearances, which have been documented by human rights groups. As in the 1997 Ghulja incident, the total numbers of Uyghurs killed and imprisoned in the July 5, 2009 unrest is unknown.
In another parallel to Ghulja, the state cracked down on information in 2009, imprisoning Niyaz and other Uyghurs who ran websites which had been used to organize the peaceful demonstration. Not only were nearly all Uyghur websites permanently wiped from the Internet in this crackdown, but online access was disabled in the entire Uyghur region for 10 months. July 5 marks another date memorialized by the Uyghur diaspora, who call on the Chinese state to account for Uyghurs who were killed, arrested or disappeared.
China's state also stands to use its counterterrorism legislation to criminalize traditional Uyghur culture, a trend apparent in the case of Merdan Seyitakhun, a final UHRP petition case. He was imprisoned in 2008 for teaching religion to Uyghur children without state sanction. China classifies any religious education for Uyghurs outside of the state's purview as "religious extremism," which therefore falls under its counter-terror umbrella. The Uyghurs' Muslim faith is a key aspect of their culture, and preventing its transmission to the younger generation imperils the very fabric of the Uyghur identity.
Signing UHRP's petition will send China's government a message that these eight prisoners of conscience have not been forgotten by the international community. Even as China's counter-terrorism legislation threatens to further criminalize Uyghurs' traditional culture and prevent any investigation into human rights abuses perpetrated by China's state, UHRP's petition will send a signal to China to release these prisoners of conscience and desist its unfair treatment of Uyghurs under the new law.
Sign the petition now using the following link: https://www.change.org/p/chinese-president-xi-jinping-free-eight-uyghur-political-prisoners
===
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-fay/uyghur-human-rights-proje_b_9266852.html
維吾爾人權項目請願書向中國釋放政治犯
格雷格費伊是華盛頓特區，維吾爾人權項目的項目經理。 費伊先生在烏魯木齊富布賴特獎學金在2007 - 2008年進行的研究，之後他在紐約工作了中國勞工觀察的話，保護記者委員會。 他畢業於布朗大學，2007年東亞研究集中，並在夏威夷的美國印第安納大學，北京杜克大學大學，哈爾濱CET新疆師範大學研究了中國和維吾爾語。由Greg仙女項
維吾爾人權項目請願書向中國釋放政治犯
（0）評論 |發表於2016年2月18日| 4:30 PM
（上圖：在維吾爾中國駐華盛頓大使館抗議2016年2月5日）
維吾爾人在世界各地，除了在中國，加入了抗議的2016年2月5日，為紀念大屠殺伊寧的19週年。 事件發生...
中國對維吾爾人的鎮壓伊寧的1997年案發後利用任意監禁，酷刑被拘留，而不公正的審判的基礎上，從報告的人權團體 ; 和幾個維族人被他們在抗議涉嫌的角色執行。 此外，中國嚴格禁運有關這一事件的任何信息，起訴誰試圖調查，這顯然已成為自發生事故的國家標準反應在東土耳其斯坦維權。 將近20年後，維吾爾繼續呼籲一個獨立的調查 ，並尋求殺害，逮捕並消失在維吾爾會計。
Abdurazzak Shamseden是一個無辜的人誰發現自己在伊寧大屠殺發生後風靡起來。 他被拘留並非在遊行本身參與; 而之後，他的侄子是在與警察的一次小衝突中喪生，Abdurazzak被關押在報復他的家庭悲劇連接。 一位年輕的農民等待的婚姻，在他年富力強，Abdurazzak被判處終身監禁。 人權日去年12月，華盛頓特區，維吾爾人權項目（UHRP） 發起請願釋放八黨名囚犯，其中包括Abdurazzak。 Abdurazzak的姐姐工程UHRP，不知疲倦地戰鬥捍衛自己人民的人權和保護由中國國家像她自己有針對性的其他家庭。
UHRP的請願書已經取得了一定的成功了。 中國政府在2016年2月宣布，玉山江，誰在監獄中被關押了十年了，儘管他的加拿大國籍的維吾爾政治犯，將他15年徒刑6個月減刑。 國家媒體隱瞞進一步的細節，這符合中國政府的非透明的方式，幾乎所有的囚犯的請願書 。 也不是減少上訴或司法程序，突出了法律的中國統治的弱點造成的。 因此，這是一個苦樂參半的慶祝活動。 代表他的倡導現在比以往任何時候都更加重要。
塞利爾，監禁純粹的政治原因的傳教士，被定罪為中國的反恐運動，中國當局編入新的立法，在2016年，與維吾爾人可能帶來災難性後果的一部分。 最近UHRP報告審查了法律的潛力，導致侵犯人權的行為。 UHRP主任卡西莫夫Seytoff說：“法律並不能保證東土耳其斯坦人民的安全，只有通過合法的活動刑事化加劇緊張局勢這將有助於進一步疏遠和邊緣化的 維吾爾我擔心該地區的發展方向。向陷入進一步的鎮壓。中國政府為這些侵犯人權的行為在信息空間發生準備更是令人不安。“
通過法律強制執行的信息無效是指與“恐怖主義”，它的立法鬆散定義包括任何反政府活動的信息犯罪行為。 中國雖然有反國家收費鎮壓言論自由和權利有關的報告的歷史。 事實上，列入政治犯五UHRP的請願書是記者或公民記者。 中國交給其所有的最嚴厲的一句話來伊力哈木·土赫提，一個維吾爾學者誰跑了普通話網站，以促進中國漢族（多數民族在中國）和維吾爾人之間的對話。 2014年，伊力哈木·土赫提被判處無期徒刑和七個志願者站點還關押了3 - 8年，包括在請願書三：Mutellip伊明，Atikem肉孜和阿克巴爾·伊明。
記者Gheyret尼牙孜，另一個請願書的情況下，也只是監禁運行的網站。 尼牙孜是在2009年7月在維吾爾烏魯木齊騷亂東突後四捨五入，自治區首府，組裝於2009年7月5日，呼籲調查幾個維族工人在珠三角地區的謀殺案。 警方鎮壓抗議，並再次，國家與法外處決和失踪普遍存在，並已作出回應記載人權團體 。 由於在1997年的伊寧事件，維吾爾族的總數死亡，在7月5日入獄，2009年動亂是未知的。
在另一個平行於伊寧，國家在2009年鎮壓的信息，監禁和孜誰跑哪了用於組織和平示威網站其他維吾爾族。 不僅是永久的，幾乎所有的維吾爾網站從互聯網上抹去這種打擊，但在線訪問整個維吾爾地區被禁止了10個月。 7月5日標誌著維吾爾族僑民，誰呼籲中國政府考慮到誰被殺，被捕或失踪的維吾爾上奏另一個日期。
中國國家還隨時使用其反恐立法為刑事犯罪維吾爾族傳統文化，Merdan Seyitakhun，最後的情況下，明顯的趨勢UHRP信訪案件。 他於2008年被關押了未經國家制裁教宗教維族孩子。 中國國家範圍為“宗教極端主義”，它因此，其反恐傘下屬於境外分類維吾爾任何宗教教育。 維吾爾“穆斯林信仰是其文化的一個重要方面，並防止傳染給年輕一代危及維吾爾認同的基本結構。
簽約UHRP的請願書將派出中國政府認為這八個政治犯沒有被忘記國際社會的消息。 儘管中國的反恐立法，有可能進一步刑事犯罪維吾爾傳統文化和防止任何調查由中國國家踐踏人權，UHRP的請願書將信號發送到中國釋放良心這些囚犯，並在停止其維吾爾族的不公平待遇新的法律。
簽署請願書，現在使用下列鏈接： https://www.change.org/p/chinese-president-xi-jinping-free-eight-uyghur-political-prisoners
===
Sunday, September 27, 2015
Track down lost or stolen Smartphone and Tablet
It will be useful as a first approach to the subject in this post, see the now irreplaceable YouTube for erudirsi on the latest methods adopted by those who practice one of the most profitable activities of our beautiful country.
There are thousands of App available on the various App-Store dedicated to the subject, but one that we want to bring to the attention of the readers is: Where's My Droid; E 'among the most popular apps in the industry and having had the opportunity to test it we can certainly give it a leading role, also, last but not least the free version is fully specified yet full of options you can use.
For example, it allows us to find the "missing" using the GPS system that indicates the location of the cell in the area; Even with Flare GPS system, which warns us on consumption and on the exhaustion of the battery is easy to deduce if it is lost or stolen; We will find the lost phone nearby with the sound system of the bell and / or / with vibration; There is the so called Stealth Mode to hide the text on your Android smartphone and enter a arbitraio message to our choice, place a lot of attention to this particular procedure, whether in the event of theft were writing things like "Thief, I'm tracking" potssiamo be more that certain that our beloved and sought after device should be to keep company to the fish. E 'can also enter a security password to prevent unwanted changes to the applications; and finally, if so, we will be informed at a previously selected alternate number when a new SIM is inserted.
The download is available here.
This is all.
===
週日，2015年9月27日
追查丟失或被盜的智能手機和平板
這將是有益的作為第一方法，在這篇文章的主題，看現在不可替代的YouTube為erudirsi對那些誰實踐我們美麗的國家的最賺錢的活動之一，採用了最新的方法。
有成千上萬的應用程序上提供的各種應用程序商店專門討論這個問題，而是一個我們想帶給讀者的注意的是： 哪裡是我的Droid的; 在同行業中最熱門的應用之一E'，並具有有機會測試我們肯定可以給它一個主導作用，同時，最後但並非最不重要的免費版本是完全指定尚未滿可以使用的選項。
例如，它使我們能夠找到“丟失”的使用GPS系統，指示在該區域的細胞的位置; 甚至與耀斑的GPS系統，該警告我們的消費和在電池用盡容易推斷，如果它丟失或被盜; 我們將與鐘和/或/與振動音響系統附近尋找丟失的手機; 還有就是所謂的隱身模式隱藏在你的Android智能手機的文本和輸入arbitraio消息，我們的選擇，放置了很多關注這個特殊的程序，無論是在盜竊事件在寫像“小偷，我跟踪”potssiamo更那肯定的是，我們敬愛和追捧設備應該是保持公司的魚。 E'也可以輸入安全密碼，以防止不必要的應用程序的變化; 最後，如果是這樣，我們將在以前選擇的備用號碼時，插入新的SIM通知。
下載可在這裡。
這就是全部。
===
Putin has come to grips with the Internet and outlined his instructions to regulate the IT-sphere
The official portal of the President of the Russian Federation has published a list of instructions, which are signed by Vladimir Putin after a meeting with the participants of the first Russian Forum "Internet Economy", held on 22 December 2015.
Volume on the list of areas of future public works in Internet and IT-sphere has 16 points and is aimed at fulfillment of a number of ministries, including the Federal Security Service, Prosecutor General's Office, the Ministry of Communications, Roskomnadzor, Ministry of Justice officials, including his new adviser "on the Internet" Herman Klimenko , as well as structures such as the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" ( IRI ) and the Foundation for the development of Internet initiatives (FRII).
Among the instructions indicated by the development of new legislation in the area of priority procurement of Russian software before foreign ones, to create equal conditions for the activities of Internet companies in Russia (read - the introduction of additional burdens on the activities of foreign companies), running on import substitution competence center in the field of information and communication technologies, regulation of the citizens of Russia data on the Internet, changes in the requirements for encryption of data transmitted over communication networks, the creation of a common accounting mechanism for complaints of Russian citizens, the organization of monitoring of information threats in the network and more.
Several media made Putin orders data analysis.
For example, "Vedomosti" reported that the order to ensure equal conditions of work IT-companies may involve, in particular, the introduction of value added tax (VAT) on the sale of services in Russia by foreign companies such as Google and Apple.
The draft law on the introduction of the VAT in December last year
contributed to the Duma deputies Andrei Lugovoi and Vladimir Parahin.
Now, when users buy apps, music and movies in the online store Google
Play and the Apple AppStore, the company did not pay VAT in Russia with
these purchases.
"A situation in which Russian consumers to purchase content more
profitable for foreign companies because the cost in this case does not
include value added tax (VAT) on the Russian market", - explained the
authors of the project. For this reason, Russian companies data services are becoming less attractive. VAT should be levied on the territory inhabited by the consumer, deputies say.
To realize this idea, Lugovoi and Parahin offered to cancel the
preference for software developers, exempt them from VAT on the sale of
exclusive rights to programs and databases. This will affect the interests and Russian companies.
But MPs as compensation for Russian developers offer to provide the
right to deduct the amount of value added tax in the provision of
electronic services, the place of supply of which is not recognized by
Russia. Another order of Putin - to extend the reduced insurance premiums for the domestic IT-companies.
"MK" is said
that Putin "incited" the FSB and the Prosecutor General's Office on the
Internet threats and reminded that previously the Russian Prime
Minister Dmitry Medvedev said that the structure can be created, endowed
with authority to regulate activities on the Internet.
In turn, the head of the Russian Security Council Nikolai Patrushev,
last year talked about the preparation of the new doctrine on
information security of the country, which will be approved in 2016.
. Full list data Putin's orders:
1. Development of Russia, Ministry of Communications of Russia, the Ministry of Industry of Russia together with interested federal executive authorities and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to submit proposals to amend the legislation to ensure the priority of Russian hardware and software in procurement.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: A. Ulyukayev, NA Nikiforov, Manturov DV, Klimenko GS
2. FAS Russia, Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance of Russia, Federal Tax Service of Russia, Russian Ministry of Industry, Ministry of Communications of Russia, together with interested federal executive bodies and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to submit proposals to amend the legislation to ensure equal conditions for the companies activities Russian Federation using the Internet.
Term - September 1, 2016
Responsible: Igor Artemyev, Ulyukayev AV, Siluanov AG, Mishustin MV Manturov DV Nikiforov NA, Klimenko GS
3. The Ministry of Finance of Russia, Russian Ministry of Communications, Ministry of Economic Development of Russia together with interested federal executive authorities and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to submit proposals for the extension of the lower rates of insurance contributions for domestic companies operating in the field of information technology.
Term - April 1, 2016
Responsible: Siluanov AG, NA Nikiforov, Ulyukayev AV Klimenko GS
4. The Ministry of Industry Russia, Russian Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Transport of Russia, Ministry of Construction of Russia, Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Communications of Russia, together with interested federal executive authorities and the Foundation for the development of Internet initiatives, to submit proposals for the implementation of domestic industrial technology of the Internet and development of appropriate regulatory frameworks.
Term - November 1, 2016
Responsible: Manturov DV, AV Novak, Maxim Sokolov, MA Men, Ulyukayev AV Nikiforov NA, Varlamov KV
5. Development of Russia, Ministry of Education of Russia, Ministry of Finance of Russia, Ministry of Industry Russia, Russian Ministry of Communications together with interested federal executive authorities to submit a draft of the order of formation of the list of advanced information and communication technologies for the selection of projects of the Institute.
Term - September 1, 2016
Responsible: A. Ulyukayev, Livanov DV, Siluanov AG, Manturov DV Nikiforov NA
6. The Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Industry Russia, Russian Ministry of Communications, FSTEC Russia together with interested federal executive authorities and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to submit proposals for the creation of web-based Development Institute, Association of Software and Expert Centre of e-government on import substitution Competence Center in the field of information and communication technologies.
Term - April 1, 2016
Responsible: A. Ulyukayev, Manturov DV, NA Nikiforov, Celine VV, Klimenko GS
7. The Ministry of Education of Russia, Ministry of Communications of Russia, Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Roskomnadzor, Rosobrnadzor together with interested federal executive authorities and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to submit proposals for the creation of the state system of certification of electronic educational materials and e-learning programs for use in the field of education.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: Livanov DV, NA Nikiforov, Ulyukayev AV Zharov AA, Kravtsov SS, GS Klimenko
8. The Russian Ministry of Education in cooperation with the Ministry of Communications of Russia and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" to take steps to include in exemplary educational programs of higher education in the field of computer science, computer engineering and information security and (or) training courses, disciplines (modules) for the review of information technology , systems and networks, issues related to the study of domestic developments in this area.
Term - September 1, 2016
Responsible: Livanov DV, Nikiforov NA, Klimenko GS
9. The Russian Federal Security Service, the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, Russian Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Communications of Russia, Roskomnadzor, Russia FADH together with interested federal executive bodies to submit proposals for the organization of monitoring of information threats on the Internet.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: AV Bortnikov, Chaika UY, AV Konovalov, NA Nikiforov, Zharov AA, IV Barinov
10. The Ministry of Communications of Russia, Russian Ministry of Justice, the Federal Security Service of Russia Roskomnadzor, Russia FSTEC together with interested federal executive authorities to submit proposals to the legislation of the Russian Federation in the Internet Data Regulation citizens.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: NA Nikiforov, AV Konovalov, Bortnikov AV Zharov AA, Celine V.
11. The Ministry of Finance of Russia, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Rosfinmonitoring, Ministry of Communications of Russia, together with interested federal executive bodies to submit proposals for the implementation of a common approach to the verification of the information provided with banking services, including the Internet.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: Siluanov AG, Elvira Nabiullina, Chikhanchin Yuri Nikiforov NA
12. The Russian Federal Security Service, Ministry of Communications of Russia, together with interested federal executive authorities to submit proposals to amend the requirements to encrypt data transmitted over communication networks in the Russian Federation, envisaging responsibility for their violation.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: AV Bortnikov, NA Nikiforov
13. The Ministry of Communications of Russia, Russian Ministry of Economic Development together with interested federal executive authorities and the NGO "Institute for Internet Development" provide a list of measures to improve the quality of public and municipal services in electronic form.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: NA Nikiforov, Ulyukayev AV Klimenko GS
14. The Ministry of Communications of Russia, Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Finance of Russia, Rosfinnadzor together with interested federal executive authorities to submit proposals to eliminate duplication of expenditure by the executive authorities, local authorities and budgetary institutions in the provision of services in electronic form.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: NA Nikiforov, A. Ulyukayev, Siluanov AG, Smirnov AV
15. The Russian Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Communications of Russia, together with interested federal executive bodies, NGO "Institute for Internet Development" and the Foundation for Information Democracy and Civil Society "Foundation of information democracy" to submit proposals to create a common accounting mechanism for complaints of Russian citizens.
Term - 1 May 2016
Responsible: Ulyukayev AV Nikiforov NA, Klimenko GS, Massukh II
16. The Ministry of Construction of Russia, the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service, the Ministry of Communications of Russia Roskomnadzor together with interested federal executive bodies and NGO "Media Communication Union" to submit proposals to ensure non-discriminatory access operators in multi-family houses.
Period - 1 June 2016
Responsible: Men MA, Igor Artemyev, NA Nikiforov, Zharov AA, Petrov SV
===
普京已經與互聯網交手，並概述他的指示來規範IT球
俄羅斯聯邦總統的官方門戶網站發布了指令，這是由普京與第一俄羅斯的參與者會後簽署了一份名單論壇的“互聯網經濟”，2015年12月22日舉行。
在互聯網未來的公共工程和IT領域的地區名單上卷有16分是針對一些部委，包括聯邦安全局，總檢察長辦公室，交通部，Roskomnadzor，履行司法部的官員，其中包括 他的新顧問“在互聯網上” 赫爾曼Klimenko ，以及如非政府組織“研究所互聯網絡發展狀況”（結構IRI ）和基金會的互聯網發展的舉措（FRII）。
在 外國的前通過新的立法，在俄羅斯軟件優先採購領域的發展指明的指示，創建互聯網公司在俄羅斯（讀 - 對外國公司的活動引入額外負擔）的活動同等條件下，在信息和通信技術領域的進口替代能力中心運行，俄羅斯的數據公民在互聯網上調節，一種在通信網絡中傳輸 的數據進行加密的要求的變化，對俄羅斯公民的投訴，建立一個共同的會計制度，網絡和更多信息的威脅監測機構。
一些媒體做普京訂單數據分析。
例如，“Vedomosti的” 報告認為為了確保IT型公司可能涉及的工作同等條件下，特別是引進的價值在俄羅斯的銷售服務的外國公司，如谷歌和蘋果的增值稅（VAT）。
在去年12月推出了增值稅的法律草案促成了杜馬安德烈·盧戈沃伊和弗拉基米爾Parahin。 現在，當用戶購買在網上商店谷歌Play和蘋果AppStore的應用程序，音樂和電影，該公司並沒有在俄羅斯繳納增值稅，這些購買。 “在俄羅斯消費者購買內容的外國公司更有利可圖，因為在這種情況下，費用不包括在俄羅斯市場上的增值稅（VAT）一種情況”， - 解釋該項目的作者。 出於這個原因，俄羅斯企業數據服務正在變得越來越有吸引力。 增值稅應該由消費者居住的領土被徵收，人大代表說。
為了實現這個想法，盧戈沃伊和Parahin提出取消對軟件開發者的偏好，免徵增值稅他們出售的獨家代理權程序和數據庫。 這將影響到的利益和俄羅斯的公司。 但是，國會議員為俄羅斯開發者提供賠償，提供以小博大在提供電子服務的增值稅額的權利，其中供應的地方沒有被俄羅斯承認。 普京的另一個訂單 - 擴大國內的IT企業降低保險費。
“MK” 說 ，普京“煽動”FSB和總檢察長辦公室在互聯網上的威脅，並提醒以前的俄羅斯總理梅德韋傑夫表示，該結構可以創建，權威賦予規範互聯網上的活動。 反過來，俄羅斯聯邦安全會議帕特魯舍夫的負責人，去年談到了新的學說對國家信息安全的準備，將在2016年得到批准。
。 全部列表數據普京的命令：
1.開發俄羅斯，部俄羅斯，交通部，俄羅斯工業部與有興趣的聯邦行政機關和非政府組織“學院為互聯網發展”，共同提出建議，修改有關法例，以確保在採購俄羅斯的硬件和軟件的優先級。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：A. Ulyukayev，NA尼基福羅夫，曼圖羅夫DV，Klimenko GS
2. FAS俄羅斯，俄羅斯經濟發展部，外交部，俄羅斯財政部，俄羅斯聯邦稅務局，俄羅斯工業部，教育部俄羅斯的通訊，有興趣的聯邦執行機構和非政府組織“研究所互聯網絡發展狀況”提出建議修訂法例，以確保企業活動中的平等條件放在一起俄羅斯聯邦使用互聯網。
期限 - 2016年9月1日
負責人：伊戈爾阿爾捷米耶夫，Ulyukayev AV，Siluanov AG，Mishustin MV曼圖羅夫DV尼基福羅夫NA，Klimenko GS
3.財政部俄羅斯財政部，俄羅斯交通部，財政部俄羅斯經濟發展與有關的聯邦行政機關一起和非政府組織“學院為互聯網發展”提交提案，為國內企業在信息技術領域開展業務的保險金最低比例的延伸。
期限 - 2016年4月1日
負責人：Siluanov AG，NA尼基福羅夫，Ulyukayev AV Klimenko GS
4.工信部俄羅斯，俄羅斯能源部部，俄羅斯部，俄羅斯建築，俄羅斯經濟發展部，俄羅斯通訊的運輸的，有興趣的聯邦行政機關和基金會的互聯網發展的舉措一起，提交建議書互聯網和適當的監管框架發展國內工業技術的實施。
期限 - 2016年11月1日
負責人：曼圖羅夫DV，AV諾瓦克，馬克西姆·索科洛夫，MA男人，Ulyukayev AV尼基福羅夫NA，瓦爾拉莫夫KV
5.開發俄羅斯，俄羅斯教育部，財政部俄羅斯財政部，工信部俄羅斯，俄羅斯交通部與感興趣的聯邦行政機關一起提交形成了研究所的項目的選擇先進的信息和通信技術的列表的順序草案。
期限 - 2016年9月1日
負責人：A. Ulyukayev，利瓦諾夫DV，Siluanov AG，曼圖羅夫DV尼基福羅夫NA
6.俄羅斯經濟發展部，工信部俄羅斯，俄羅斯交通部，FSTEC俄羅斯有興趣的聯邦行政機關和非政府組織“研究所互聯網絡發展狀況”提交一份關於進口替代能力中心為創建基於Web的開發研究院，軟件協會和專家中心電子政務的提案一起在信息和通信技術領域。
期限 - 2016年4月1日
負責人：A. Ulyukayev，曼圖羅夫DV，NA尼基福羅夫，席琳VV，Klimenko GS
7.俄羅斯教育部，教育部俄羅斯通信部，俄羅斯Roskomnadzor經濟發展，Rosobrnadzor與有關聯邦行政機關和非政府組織“學院為互聯網發展”起來部提交提案創造在教育領域使用電子教材和電子學習方案認證的國家制度。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：利瓦諾夫DV，NA尼基福羅夫，Ulyukayev AV Zharov AA，Kravtsov SS，GS Klimenko
8.俄羅斯教育部與俄羅斯非政府組織“學院為互聯網發展”交通部合作，採取措施，在計算機科學，計算機工程和信息安全和（或）培訓課程，學科（模塊）的領域信息技術的審查高等教育的示範教育項目，包括，系統和網絡，涉及到這一領域國內發展研究的問題。
期限 - 2016年9月1日
負責人：利瓦諾夫DV，尼基福羅夫NA，Klimenko GS
9.俄羅斯聯邦安全局，俄羅斯聯邦總檢察長，俄司法部，衛生部俄羅斯，Roskomnadzor的通信，俄羅斯FADH與有關聯邦執行機構一起提交提案在互聯網上的信息威脅的監測機構。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：AV博爾特尼科夫，柴卡UY，AV科諾瓦洛夫，NA尼基福羅夫，Zharov AA，IV巴里諾夫
10部俄羅斯通訊，俄司法部，俄羅斯Roskomnadzor，俄羅斯FSTEC的聯邦安全局與有關聯邦行政機關共同提出建議，俄羅斯聯邦在互聯網數據調節公民的立法。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：NA尼基福羅夫，AV科諾瓦洛夫，博爾特尼科夫AV Zharov AA，席琳V.
11.教育部俄羅斯，俄羅斯聯邦中央銀行，俄金監督局，衛生部俄羅斯通訊的財務，有興趣的聯邦執行機構一起提交提案的共同的方法來提供銀行服務，包括互聯網在內的信息的核查落實。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：Siluanov AG，納比烏林娜，Chikhanchin尤里·尼基福羅夫NA
12.俄羅斯聯邦安全局，俄羅斯衛生部的通信，與有興趣的聯邦行政機關一起提交建議修改的要求，俄羅斯聯邦通過通信網絡傳輸的數據進行加密，設想為他們的違法行為負責。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：AV博爾特尼科夫，NA尼基福羅夫
13部俄羅斯，交通部，俄羅斯經濟發展部與有興趣的聯邦行政機關和非政府組織“研究所互聯網絡發展狀況”共同提供的措施，改善公共和市政服務，以電子形式的質量清單。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：NA尼基福羅夫，Ulyukayev AV Klimenko GS
14部俄羅斯，交通部，俄羅斯經濟發展部，外交部，俄羅斯，Rosfinnadzor財政部與有關聯邦行政機關一起提交建議行政機關，地方當局和財政機構以電子形式提供服務，以消除開支重複。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：NA尼基福羅夫，A Ulyukayev，Siluanov AG，斯米爾諾夫AV
15.俄羅斯經濟發展部，俄羅斯通信的，有興趣的聯邦執行機構一起，非政府組織“學院為互聯網發展”的基金會信息民主與公民社會“信息民主基金會”提出建議，以創建為俄羅斯公民的投訴共同的會計制度。
期限 - 2016年1月
負責人：Ulyukayev AV尼基福羅夫NA，Klimenko GS，Massukh II
16.俄羅斯建築，俄羅斯聯邦反壟斷局，共同俄羅斯Roskomnadzor的交通部與有關聯邦執行機構和非政府組織的“媒體傳播聯盟”部提交建議，以確保在多家庭住宅不受歧視地獲得運營商。
期 - 2016年6月1日
負責人：男人MA，伊戈爾阿爾捷米耶夫，NA尼基福羅夫，Zharov AA，彼得羅夫SV
===
http://www.3dnews.ru/928676/
"Doctor Web" found a Trojan that refuses to work in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan
02.23.2016 [7:02] Gleb Ermakov.
Anti-virus analysts the company "Doctor Web" in this month recorded the
activity of a new Trojan called BackDoor.Andromeda.1407, which is
distributed by another Trojan downloader - Trojan.Sathurbot.1.
The main purpose of BackDoor.Andromeda.1407 - implementation of directives coming from intruders, including downloading and installing additional plug-ins, and other malicious software. The interaction with the control server carries out the backdoor with a special encrypted key address command assemblies are also stored in the body of the malware in an encrypted form. The information transfer is implemented using data interchange format JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) using cryptography method.
When you run the backdoor in the infected system checks the command
line for the presence of «/ test» and in case of detection of output in
the console message «\ n Test - OK» key, and then terminates. In the event of any danger for yourself program, BackDoor.Andromeda.1407 goes into an endless sleep.
Then backdoor reads the serial number of the system hard disk volume that you want to generate the values of various named objects. Immediately after its launch by injection produce malware tries to move to a new process, and the original - complete. This allows him to simultaneously collect a variety of information about the infected machine, including the bit and the OS version, the rights of the current user and configured on the attacked computer keyboard. And here comes the fun part: if BackDoor.Andromeda.1407 detects the presence of Windows in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian or Kazakh layouts, it is terminated and removed from the system itself.
The main purpose of BackDoor.Andromeda.1407 - implementation of directives coming from intruders, including downloading and installing additional plug-ins, and other malicious software. The interaction with the control server carries out the backdoor with a special encrypted key address command assemblies are also stored in the body of the malware in an encrypted form. The information transfer is implemented using data interchange format JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) using cryptography method.
Then backdoor reads the serial number of the system hard disk volume that you want to generate the values of various named objects. Immediately after its launch by injection produce malware tries to move to a new process, and the original - complete. This allows him to simultaneously collect a variety of information about the infected machine, including the bit and the OS version, the rights of the current user and configured on the attacked computer keyboard. And here comes the fun part: if BackDoor.Andromeda.1407 detects the presence of Windows in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian or Kazakh layouts, it is terminated and removed from the system itself.
http://www.3dnews.ru/928676/
“醫生網”發現，拒絕在俄羅斯，烏克蘭，白俄羅斯和哈薩克斯坦合作木馬
2016年2月23日 [7:02] 格列布Ermakov說.
反病毒分析師在本月初該公司“網絡醫生”記錄一個新的木馬叫做BackDoor.Andromeda.1407的活動，這是另一種木馬下載器分佈 - Trojan.Sathurbot.1。
BackDoor.Andromeda.1407的主要目的 - 執行指令入侵者，包括下載和安裝額外的插件，和其他惡意軟件的到來。 與控制服務器的交互執行一個特殊的加密的密鑰地址命令組件也被存儲在該惡意軟件的主體以加密的形式的後門。 信息傳輸採用加密技術使用方法的數據交換格式JSON（JavaScript對象符號）來實現。
當您運行在被感染系統的後門檢查的«/測試»存在，並在控制台消息輸出的檢測的情況下，命令行«\ n測試 - OK“鍵，然後終止。 在為自己程序中的任何危險的情況下，BackDoor.Andromeda.1407進入一個無休止的睡眠。
然後讀取後門要產生各種命名對象的值系統硬盤卷的序列號。 緊接著推出通過注射產生的惡意軟件試圖移動到一個新的進程，而原 - 完整。 這讓他可以同時收集各種關於被感染的機器，包括位和OS版本，當前用戶的權限和被攻擊的電腦鍵盤上的配置信息。 這裡來了有趣的部分：如果BackDoor.Andromeda.1407檢測Windows在俄羅斯，烏克蘭，白俄羅斯和哈薩克斯坦佈局的存在，它被終止，並從系統本身刪除。
BackDoor.Andromeda.1407的主要目的 - 執行指令入侵者，包括下載和安裝額外的插件，和其他惡意軟件的到來。 與控制服務器的交互執行一個特殊的加密的密鑰地址命令組件也被存儲在該惡意軟件的主體以加密的形式的後門。 信息傳輸採用加密技術使用方法的數據交換格式JSON（JavaScript對象符號）來實現。
然後讀取後門要產生各種命名對象的值系統硬盤卷的序列號。 緊接著推出通過注射產生的惡意軟件試圖移動到一個新的進程，而原 - 完整。 這讓他可以同時收集各種關於被感染的機器，包括位和OS版本，當前用戶的權限和被攻擊的電腦鍵盤上的配置信息。 這裡來了有趣的部分：如果BackDoor.Andromeda.1407檢測Windows在俄羅斯，烏克蘭，白俄羅斯和哈薩克斯坦佈局的存在，它被終止，並從系統本身刪除。
===
State regulation of Internet use in Russia: From the Internet to the Middle Ages On Posted 10/7/2015 by Temych
State regulation of Internet use in Russia: From the Internet to the Middle Ages
"RosKomSvoboda" Speaking at the annual International Wiki-conference , held October 3-4 in Kostroma on the basis of the name of NA Kostroma State University Nekrasov.
At the conference, representatives from 10 countries made presentations and active discussion on these topics that interest wiki community as "public domain", "State regulation of the Internet in Russia and blocking encyclopedias and libraries", "The development of Wikipedia in Russia and other countries", "Vikidal , MediaWiki, WikiMaps and other projects on the basis of wiki-technology "," Scientific publications with open type of information "and others.
Artem Kozlyuk, head of the "RosKomSvoboda" NGO, presented a report on the legislative regulation of the Internet space, the practice of its enforcement and possible future consequences svezhevnedrennyh legislation.
State regulation of Internet use in Russia: From the Internet to the Middle Ages
.
The main theses of the report:
State regulation of the Internet space, which was initiated in 2012 by the adoption of the first law on extrajudicial blocking of websites, unfortunately at the moment passes explicitly repressive and regressive trend impact on the information environment and user interaction in it.
At the moment, already adopted many laws affecting the interaction of citizens in the network space, maintenance of public and business projects in it, which impose unnecessary burdens and censor information and educational online resources and generally bearing the obstacles to the development of modern technologies.
The basis for building such a legal framework, mostly supporting the regressive and repressive was 149-FZ (the law "On information, information technologies and information protection"), adopted in 2006, but in the last 3 years actively become filled with new articles and points. This law was the basis for constructing a system of banned sites registers .
Also, a number of new laws regulating the online environment and the area of user communications based on the addition and expansion of standards and codes of criminal and administrative offenses, as well as the Civil Code.
Separate laws make a difference in the number of sectoral laws, such as the financial sector or the health sector.
Brick by brick built castle walls that want to cut us all from certain interactions between them, regions of knowledge and information sources.
From the basic building blocks of the wall - this is the first law on extrajudicial blocking sites - 139-FZ , adopted in summer 2012 and earned 1 November of that year, which is the main basis of banned sites registry and by the way, on the basis of which just exposed blocking Wikipedia and still a number of articles online encyclopedia are in the registry , it is true in a closed part of it, without unloading operators to lock.
139-FZ opened the door capabilities of government agencies churning out new laws to expand the criteria and types of forbidden information. A year later, in 2013 adopted the so-called "Antipiracy" Law 187-FZ , and at the end of the same year - Law 398-FZ , which became known in the network space as the law of "political censorship".
Both laws also continued the practice of filling the active registry banned sites with locks thousands of Internet resources directly and hundreds of thousands of sites "at the same time", because current regulating the Internet in Russia, the law allows you to restrict access are not dotted, page by page, and carpet bombing on network addresses, exposing the lock and a huge number of those portals, which did not take place on their decisions Ban. We publish this statistic on locks, including illegal, in the relevant section of our portal.
2014 was the most fruitful for the adopted laws in the Internet field, key laws have become 97-FZ , the law "of bloggers and organizers of the dissemination of information", 364-FZ , the law "antipiracy 2.0", 242-FZ , the law "Data localization Russia "and many others.
The most resonant laws that have been adopted in the current year were the Law 129-FZ "of unwanted organizations", which including prohibits the operation of Internet resources such recognized organizations. For example, if a list gets the same Wikimedia Foundation, it will be limited in Russia access to all projects and sites that operate under its auspices.
Another law imposing significant sanctions now on the media, including in the Internet space, it became 116-FZ, introducing fines of up to 1 million rubles. the media, which in any way not in a negative way describe some extremist activities. We all know that the concept of "extremism" in our legislation is very vague, and under it you can if you want to pull up the vast majority of active citizens' action network or offline space. And, as a consequence, the law introduces another leverage of state censorship on the media.
Well, probably the most famous adopted in 2015 the law became 264-FZ - " the right to oblivion ", which makes it possible to exclude from the search results any information about yourself, which is not like this or that person, even socially important, even reliable.
In addition to direct already adopted laws at the present time are different stages of discussion in the State Duma more than a dozen bills, most of which will exacerbate the current situation with the violation of our with you the rights and freedoms: introducing new categories of prohibited information, increased fines and sentences for violation previously entered rules and introducing new rules absurd, for example, there is a bill on the introduction of the Internet time zones and may not be distributed or that the information from 7 am to 12 am.
But there are a number of bills from a positive trend, introduced to the State Duma including and with our direct participation. For example, a return to the public domain of the Soviet cultural heritage, reducing the term of protection of copyright created for goschet and cancellation of "anti-piracy" legislation.
.
I think it is worth to highlight some key laws that everyone in the field is a significant blow to all of us. They are already taken, but are at different stages of enforcement.
97-FZ introduced 2 new registry, which became the lead Roskomnadzor. It is worth noting that it does not prohibit the registers of information, and of a different kind.
First register - bloggers actively filled and contains a thousand already included in it in the Public VKontakte in Facebook, in Instagrame in Youtube and other social networking and personal pages with the attendance of more than 3 thousand people per day..
Adding to the register applies to the owners of these pages and sites certain duties, for example, to place their names and contacts, check the information posted on the reliability, etc. For a little more than a year of operation, the register is simply filled by Roskomnadzor, without any further action.
Another registry, the organizers of the dissemination of information , much more serious. It imposes on the companies and individuals who have fallen into this register, the obligation to collect and store information about each user of its Internet resources and their interaction with each other. And to provide this information to the competent authorities on the first request. Those. It created another analogue SORM, not only at the ends of operators, and already directly embedded into Internet services.
The following law 242-FZ, the law of localization (or transfer) of data of Russians in Russia, adds risks not only for online businesses but for each of us face the problem of impossibility from the territory of our country to get access to the already familiar to us the various services on foreign websites or internet projects, if they are for their own reasons refuse to post user data on the Russian territory.
Another resonant Law 264-FZ, the law is very controversial right to oblivion , will enter into force on 1 January 2016 and will bring risks still greater increase in white spots in many areas of knowledge that will be excluded from the search results - simply at the request of any person . About risks of enforcement of the law, many experts say, and the Internet industry and non-governmental organizations and even individual representatives of the state bodies.
.
If we talk about the statistics of enforcement of laws directly to block sites that function, since November 2012, it is sad: the number of blocked Internet resources is growing almost exponentially.
.
The registries of banned sites was made more than 40 thousand Internet resources directly under lock and still under the 800 thousand - under indirectly. For even these dry figures speak volumes.
Immediately appear all the most flawed aspects of Russian legislation in the field of Internet governance: the extra-over-lock respectable sites, which did not take place any judgments or decisions of the state bodies, which have the right to block extrajudicial: about 96% of all blocked in Russian sites - these are the subject to the restriction of access at the same time, just because they are on the same IP-address as the forbidden resource. And our legislation allows them to block.
It's just a crazy number, but nothing can make our state agencies, this provision of the law wanders into law.
In addition to direct themselves odious points of the new legislation governing the Internet space, there is also the practice of its misuse. Thus, there is aggravation of the already aggressive measures of state influence on the network and its users.
.
It is worth noting the fact that the chief executive authority responsible for the enforcement of laws to restrict the network space, Roskomnadzor, and he often exceeds his authority: exposes blocking not only the sites that appear in the court decisions, the Moscow City Court, the Prosecutor General's requirements, treating them Therefore and expanding its scope of these decisions and requirements to other sites that do not appear there.
Especially of concern posed by the flow of the method of Roskomnadzor entry in the register of banned sites held regional court decisions: to the thousands made not only the forbidden pages, but the sites themselves completely and their IP-addresses , thereby explicitly replaced by a judicial decision and it is extrapolated to significantly large area of knowledge and information.
.
And although the top is quite palpable increasingly growing pressure with a clear trend of repressive measures, but there is also a counter-movement from below, usually by a number of public and industry organizations that submit proposals to stimulate the development of Internet technology and various aspects of the relationship in the network space.
There are still 1 in the positive law of the plane - a legislative consolidation in the Civil Code of the concept of open licenses. Including using the wiki community still selling resistance lobby holders, opposing the introduction of new rules of relations of creators and users.
.
The use of open (free) licenses, similar licenses Creative Commons, governed by a new article of the Civil Code "Open license to use the works of science, literature or art." This article stipulates that the author or other right owner may provide the user with an open (simple, non-exclusive) license to use his work. Open License is a merger agreement, and the terms of such licenses should be available to the public and set up so that the user (licensee) could read them before using the product.
Open License applies to computer programs and databases, unless otherwise specified, within the period of validity of the exclusive rights in it, and in relation to other kinds of works - within five years. If the license is not specified open territory in which the use of the respective product is allowed, such use is permitted in the entire world.
In accordance with the new version of the Civil Code, the adoption of open source license conditions by committing acts specified in the license (for example, the adoption of the license conditions by "clicking" on the appropriate button in the online mode), equivalent to the written form of the contract, which gives an open license, placed in Internet, legally binding. Regulates the use of open licenses, similar licenses Creative Commons, providing for distribution of the product on the same terms on which it is granted by the author (copyleft), and creation of derivative works.
There are also, as mentioned above, a number of bills under consideration by the State Duma and made under our direct involvement.
Two main - is:
1) "On Amendments to Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in the part of the Soviet cultural heritage", which determines that "the exclusive right to works of science, literature or art, created under the state contract for public use, provided for the creation of such a work, and made public until 31 December 1992 inclusive, it is in the public domain from the moment of its publication. "
2) "On Amendments to Article 6 of the Federal Law" On Enactment of Part IV of the Civil Code of Russian Federation "", which reduces the term of protection of works of science, literature and art, created during the Soviet era - they are recognized as being in the public domain after the expiration of 25-year period from the date of publication (creation).
.
What makes our NGO "RosKomSvoboda":
.
Photos from the presentation and discussion of "RosKomSvobody 'report on the Wiki-conference 2015:
.
This entry was posted in Menu and tagged
===
互聯網使用的國家調控在俄羅斯：從互聯網到中世紀
在一年一度的“RosKomSvoboda”在談到國際維基的會議 ，NA科斯特羅馬州大學的名稱的基礎上，在科斯特羅馬舉行的10月3-4日 涅克拉索夫。
在會議上，來 自10個國家的代表做了發言，並就這些議題積極討論感興趣的維基社區為“公共領域”，“在俄羅斯互聯網的國家調控和阻斷百科全書和庫”，“維基百科在俄羅 斯的發展和其他國家”，“Vikidal ，鏈接到MediaWiki，WikiMaps和wiki技術的基礎上，其他項目“，”開放式的信息“等的科學出版物。
阿爾喬姆Kozlyuk的“RosKomSvoboda”非政府組織的負責人，提出了關於互聯網空間的立法監管，執法和未來可能產生的後果svezhevnedrennyh立法實踐的報告。
。
。
該報告的主要論點：
互聯網空間，這是在2012年通過的法外處決的網站阻止通過第一定律發起的國家調控，遺憾的是目前通過明確的鎮壓和倒退趨勢，在它的信息環境和用戶交互的影響。
目前，已經通過影響公民在網絡空間的互動很多法律，維護它的公共和商業項目，造成不必要的負擔，並審查信息和教育網上資源，一般軸承的現代技術發展的障礙。
建立這樣一個法律框架，主要是配套的倒退和鎮壓為149-FZ（法律“的信息，信息技術和信息保護”），於2006年通過，但在過去的3年裡，積極變得充滿新的條款，並在此基礎點。 這個法律是構建一個系統的基礎被禁網站的寄存器 。
此外，一些新的法律規範網絡環境和基礎上，增加和標準，刑事和行政違法行為代碼的擴展，以及民法用戶通信領域。
不同的法律作出的部門法，如金融部門或衛生部門的數量不同。
由想要把我們全部來自他們之間的特定互動，知識和信息來源地區磚砌城牆的磚。
從牆上的基本構建塊-這是法外處決阻塞網站的第一部法律- 139-FZ其中只有在2012年夏天通過，並贏得了當年的11月1日，這是由道路被禁網站登記和主要依據，在此基礎上暴露的封鎖維基百科和仍然有一些文章在線百科全書在註冊表中 ，它是在它的封閉部分屬實，不卸載運營商鎖定。
139-FZ開通政府機構的大門能力攪動了新的法律，擴大標準和類型的禁止信息。 一年後，在2013年通過了所謂的 “反盜版”法律187-FZ ，並在同年年底-法律398-FZ ，成為在網絡空間為“政治審查”的法律聞名。
這兩項法律還繼續填充鎖數千直接的互聯網資源，數十萬個網站的活躍註冊表被禁網站“在同一時間”的做法，因為 當前調控在俄羅斯互聯網，法律可以限制訪問不星羅棋布，逐頁地毯式轟炸頁，並在網絡地址，露出鎖以及那些門戶網站，這並沒有發生在他們的決策班的數量巨大。 我們在發布這個鎖統計，包括 非法的， 在相關章節我們的門戶網站。
2014年是最有成效的在互聯網領域通過的法律，主要的法律已經成為97-FZ ，“博客和信息傳播的組織者”的規律， 364-FZ ，法律“反盜版2.0”， 242-FZ ，法律“數據本地化俄羅斯“等等。
已在本年度通過的最洪亮的法律在法律129-FZ“多餘的組織”，其中包括 禁止因特網資源，例如認可組織的操作。 例如，如果一個列表得到相同的維基媒體基金會，將在俄羅斯的訪問，其主持下運行的所有項目和地點的限制。
另一項法律對媒體強加現在顯著制裁，包括 在互聯網領域，它成了116-FZ，推出高達100萬盧布的罰款。 媒體以任何方式不是一個消極的方式描述了一些極端主義活動。 我們都知道，在我們的立法“極端主義”的概念很模糊，並根據它你可以，如果你想絕大多數的積極公民“的行動網絡或離線空間拉起。 而且，作為一個後果，法律引入了媒體對國家審查的另一個槓桿作用。
好了，大概在2015年通過了最有名的法律成為264-FZ - “ 被遺忘的權利 ”，這使得它可以從搜索結果中排除任何個人信息，這是不喜歡這樣或那樣的人，甚至是社會重要的，甚至是可靠的。
另 外在目前的時間指導已經通過的法律是國家杜馬討論的不同階段十幾的法案，其中大部分將加劇目前的狀況與違反我們與您的權利和自由：引入新的類禁止的信息， 增加了罰款和違反句子以前輸入的規則，並引入新的規則荒謬的，例如，對引進互聯網時區的法案，並不得分發或該信息從早上7點至12點。
但也有從一個積極的趨勢了一些法案，介紹國家杜馬包括 並與我們的直接參與。 例如，返回蘇聯文化遺產的公共領域，從而減少了“反盜版”的立法goschet和取消創建著作權的保護期限。
。
我認為這是值得強調的一些重要法律，每個人都在該領域是一個顯著的打擊，我們所有的人。 他們已經採取了，但在執行的不同階段。
97-FZ推出2個新的註冊表，這成為領先Roskomnadzor。 值得注意的是，它不禁止的信息的寄存器，和一種不同的。
第一個寄存器-博客積極填補，包括已經包含在它的公共VKontakte等了Facebook，在Instagrame在YouTube和，每天超過3萬人出席其他社交網絡和個人網頁千..
添加到寄存器適用於這些網頁和網站某些職責的業主，例如，把他們的姓名和聯繫方式，檢查貼在可靠性， 等等 。對於 超過一年的運作多一點 的信息 ，寄存器只需通過Roskomnadzor填補，沒有任何採取進一步行動。
另一個註冊表，信息傳播的組織者 ，要嚴重得多。 它規定了誰已經下降到這個寄存器中的公司和個人，有義務收集和處理有關其互聯網資源的每個用戶和他們的相互交互存儲信息。 並提供該信息主管部門在第一次請求。 即 它創造了另一個模擬SORM，不僅在運營商的目的，並已直接嵌入到互聯網服務。
以下法律242-FZ，俄羅斯的數據的本地化（或轉讓）在俄羅斯的法律，增加了不僅對在線企業，但我們每個人從我國領土面臨不可能的問題，讓我們的各種服務中，對已經很熟悉的風險國外網站或互聯網的項目，如果他們對於自己的理由拒絕張貼在俄境內的用戶數據。
另一個諧振法律264-FZ，法律是非常有爭議的被遺忘的權利 ，將生效1月1日2016年會帶來的風險仍然較大增加，在許多知識領域將從搜索結果中排除白色斑點-只需在任何人的請求。 關於執法的風險，許多專家說，與互聯網行業和非政府組織，甚至個別國家機關的代表。
。
如果我們談論有關執法的統計規律，直接阻止該功能的網站，自2012年11月，這是可悲的：受阻互聯網資源的數量幾乎是呈幾何級數增長。
。
在間接-被禁網站的登記是根據80萬發四萬多的互聯網資源直屬鎖定不動。 對於即使是這些枯燥的數字說話卷。
立刻出現在互聯網治理方面俄羅斯法律所有最有缺陷的方面：超過鎖可敬的網站，這並沒有發生在國家機關，具有阻斷法外處決權的任何判斷或決定：所有被禁止在俄羅斯的網站約96％ -這是受的同時訪問的限制，僅僅是因為它們是在相同的IP地址作為禁止資源。 而我們的法律允許他們阻止。
這只是一個瘋狂的數字，但沒有什麼可以讓我們的國家機關，這一規定的法律飄蕩成為法律。
除了 直接管轄自己在互聯網空間的新的立法可憎點，也有其濫用的做法。 因此，是國家影響力的網絡和用戶就已經積極的措施加重。
。
值得注意的事實是負責法律來限制網絡空間，Roskomnadzor執法，他經常超出其權限的行政長官的權威：自曝封鎖不僅出現在法院判決的網站，莫斯科市法院，總檢察長的要求，對待他們。因此並擴大其這些決定和要求的範圍，沒有出現在那裡的其他網站。
特別是在被禁網站的註冊Roskomnadzor輸入方式的流提出的關注舉行的區域法院判決： 以數千不僅由禁頁，但網站本身完全和他們的IP位址 ，從而明確由司法判決所取代，並外推到顯著大面積的知識和信息。
。
雖然上面是相當之情溢於言表與鎮壓措施一個明顯的趨勢，越來越多的壓力越來越大，但也有反向運動從下面，通常由一個數字，提出建議，促進互聯網技術和網絡空間的關係，各方面的發展的公共和行業組織的。
目前還有1飛機的實在法-在開放許可的概念民法典立法的整合。 含 使用維基社區仍在銷售阻力大堂持有人，反對開徵的創造者和用戶的關係的新規則。
。
採用開放式（免費）許可證，類似的許可證，素材， 管轄民法典的新文章“用科學，文學或藝術作品打開許可證”。 這條規定，作者或其他權利人可以提供一個開放的（簡單的，非獨家）許可使用作品的用戶。 打開許可證是合併協議，以及該等牌照的條款應提供給公眾和設置，使用戶（許可）可以使用產品前閱讀。
開放許可證適用於計算機程序和數據庫中，除非另有規定，在它的專有權有效期內，並且相對於其他類型的作品 - 五年內。 如果沒有指定許可證，其中利用各自的產品被允許開放的領地，這樣的使用是允許在整個世界。
按照民法，通過提交許可證規定的行為的採用開源許可條件的新版本（例如，採用通過在在線模式上的相應按鈕“點擊”許可條件），相當於合同的書面形式，它給出了一個開放的許可證，放置在互聯網，具有法律約束力。 規範使用開放的許可證，許可證類似知識共享，提供在其上它是由作者（copyleft的），以及衍生作品創作授予相同的條款的產品分佈。
還有，如上所述，一些法案正在審議國家杜馬，並在我們的直接參與製作。
兩個主要的 - 是：
1）“關於修訂俄羅斯聯邦民法典第四部分在蘇聯文化遺產的一部分”，這就決定了“科學，文學或藝術，在供公眾使用的國家合同創造的作品的專有權，規定建立這樣一個工作，並公之於眾直到1992年12月31日包容性，它是在其發布的那一刻公共領域“。
2）“關於修訂聯邦法第6條”關於俄羅斯聯邦民法典“”，從而降低了科學，文學和藝術作品的保護期限的第四部分頒布，在蘇聯時期創造的 - 他們被視為到期後是在公共領域從出版（創造）之日起25年。
。
是什麼讓我們的非政府組織“RosKomSvoboda”：
。
照片從展示和“RosKomSvobody”Wiki上的會議2015年報告的討論：
。
===
CloudFlare IP Ranges
Some applications or host providers might find it handy to know about CloudFlare's IPs. This page is intended to be the definitive source of CloudFlare's current IP ranges. IPv4
IPv4
- 103.21.244.0/22
- 103.22.200.0/22
- 103.31.4.0/22
- 104.16.0.0/12
- 108.162.192.0/18
- 131.0.72.0/22
- 141.101.64.0/18
- 162.158.0.0/15
- 172.64.0.0/13
- 173.245.48.0/20
- 188.114.96.0/20
- 190.93.240.0/20
- 197.234.240.0/22
- 198.41.128.0/17
- 199.27.128.0/21
IPv6
- 2400: cb00 :: / 32
- 2405: 8100 :: / 32
- 2405: b500 :: / 32
- 2606: 4700 :: / 32
- 2803: f800 :: / 32
===
CloudFlare的IP範圍
某些應用程序或主機提供商可能會發現它很方便了解CloudFlare的IP地址。 本頁面的目的是CloudFlare的當前的IP範圍的權威來源。 IPv4的
IPv4的
- 103.21.244.0/22
- 103.22.200.0/22
- 103.31.4.0/22
- 104.16.0.0/12
- 108.162.192.0/18
- 131.0.72.0/22
- 141.101.64.0/18
- 162.158.0.0/15
- 172.64.0.0/13
- 173.245.48.0/20
- 188.114.96.0/20
- 190.93.240.0/20
- 197.234.240.0/22
- 198.41.128.0/17
- 199.27.128.0/21
IPv6的
- 2400：CB00 :: / 32
- 2405：8100 :: / 32
- 2405：B500 :: / 32
- 2606：4700 :: / 32
- 2803：F800 :: / 32
===
Total in the Register of prohibited websites:
Records: 23624.
總計在禁止的網站的註冊：
記錄：23624.
click in ....more more...
===
Anonymous Russia已轉推
https://vk.com/rkn список администраторов этой группы))) Go fuck SPAM
===
Kazakhstan became massively to block sites
In recent days, in the Republic of Kazakhstan users faced with massive locks large Internet resources, reported by a number of local media who tried to find out the cause of such actions on the part of operators.
As reported by "Kazakhstanskaya Pravda", to block sites in Kazakhstan apply outdated methods, which leads to restriction of access not only to web pages in which the judgment, but also of others, which coincides with the IP-address. Many Kazakhstan World Wide Web users are wondering why in the republic denied access to certain foreign websites.
"Kazakhstanskaya Pravda" tried to find out the cause of the situation in the "Samruk-Kazyna" JSC, a subsidiary of which is the main telecom operator of the country JSC "Kazakhtelecom" and asked for comment to experts in Internet Association of Kazakhstan.
Note that the request was made on the basis of appeals to the editors of subscribers of "Kazakhtelecom", which sent a list of problematic resources as at 18 August 2015.
The list included 17 resources, access to which has been partially or completely obstructed. Among them: the Internet Archive archive.org , an international petition site Avaaz.org , the Russian information-entertainment portal fresher.ru , site of the British newspaper Daily Mail dailymail.co.uk , the international news agency fergananews.com , international photo sharing site flickr.com , the blogosphere liveinternet.ru , access to which is periodically blocked blogosphere livejournal.com , website writer Leonid Kaganova lleo.me , Russia's largest literary portal, which offers authors the possibility of free publication of works proza.ru , an international information portal reddit.com , modern literature server "Samizdat" in the library Moshkova samlib.ru , media content download site SaveFrom.net , on stoicism portal philosophical direction stoicallyspeaking.org , dictionary English slang, catch phrase, dialects urbandictionary.com , memory site of the musician and poet Yankee Diaghilev yanka.lenin .mobi , humorous site zagony.ru . And also had trouble using Google - photohosting picasa.ru and blogosphere google +.
As the chief of asset management «Samruk-Kazyna» Nurzhan Baidauletov, lock / unlock online resources are "Kazakhtelecom" only by court order. National operator with limited access to sites by IP-address.
However, JSC "Kazakhtelecom" can not explain why his subscribers have difficulties with access to the other of the following resources and services.
The Internet Association of Kazakhstan clarified why access to sites blocked by the wrong address, and over IP.
"Blocking by IP-address - an old and well-known method. Today, of course, you can easily restrict access by domain name. The only difference is that the domain name can be easily changed and to continue its work. Then the court execution is not fulfilled not in terms of a domain name and a content point of view. But even this argument can be answered, and that the address can be changed, too. So that the lock on the IP-address is much worse, because in this case, block all websites that are located at this address. And some of the same address are thousands or tens of thousands of sites. Especially if to say about cloud solutions, there IP-addressing moves dynamically and sometimes it is unclear what kind of address block "- said the president of the association Shavkat Sabirov.
However, he believes that the problem may also lie in the lack of competence of the officials and judges.
"The operator may not know why it is limiting access by IP-address, since the judgment has come in this form. Imagine sitting official and wrote a formal request pursuant to a court decision, and it is easier to write on the IP-address than repeat the domain name entirely. Or the judge who decides, knows the addresses better than domain names. In this case, the judgment is clear, and the operator simply takes it, it is like it or not ", - says the expert.
Sabirov calls on decision-makers to be able to understand and openly explain to the public the reasons for the blocking of Internet resources.
"The situation with locks or restricted access has recently become urgent. We need to solve this issue fundamentally, "- emphasizes the president of Internet Association.
However, the Association recalled that he had repeatedly raised the issue of the official publication of the list of prohibited resources on the territory of Kazakhstan. Such a registry exists in Russia reestr.rublacklist.net .
As informs portal Digital.Report, the start date of the history of Kazakhstan online-locks - at the dawn of the Internet spread in the country - is considered to be November 4, 1999, when it became impossible to connect to the opposition website Eurasia.org.ru. The most famous example of this same block in Kazakhstan is a ban on access to the most popular Russian-language blogging platform "LiveJournal". Access closed since 2008, when it started its homepage disgraced in-law of President Nursultan Nazarbaev, Rakhat Aliyev, the late. For three years the site has been closed to users from Kazakhstan without a court order and any official explanation, and only in August 2011 Saryarka District Court of Astana (already after blog Aliyev was removed from the "Live Journal") issued a decision official allegedly blocked the platform due to the presence there of "extremist materials."
A number of opposition online publications ( "Republic", "look", guljan.org) also blocked long before the formal judicial decisions, which are then completely prohibited activities journalistic teams.
Filtering - a whole web2.0 platform format, and the point lock
resources with a critical and politically sensitive content - has
intensified in the last month. September 9 was blocked by a popular website Ratel.kz, created in 2013 by independent journalists. Just a day online newspaper Zonakz.net also was unavailable for the readers. In this case the owners of these resources still do not know on what grounds they were blocked. However, recently it became possible to go to Zonakz.net - again, without explanation.
It puts forward two possible versions of events. The first - the ruling elite in Kazakhstan is preparing for a major political change. The current measures can be taken for testing certain blocking techniques that are then at the right moment will be applied to all other online media. Second - it is possible that data online edition allowed the publication of any material that caused a negative reaction from some of the power elites. In any case, according to the analyst, these actions of the authorities are illegal in nature.
"Blocking without official reason is unacceptable. There are laws, there are rules that are equal for all, both for citizens and for public authorities. In fact, the state itself should be profitable not to play hide and seek with the public, and honestly and openly talk about problems. We like air needed official register of blocked sites, as it was implemented in Russia. The more transparency in such decisions, the easier it is to state in its relations with the public. ".
Shavkat Sabirov, "Internet Association of Kazakhstan" (IAK)
Under the pretext of combating extremism was closed and access to the video hosting Vimeo.com. The decision to lock a resource in Kazakhstan was adopted September 7 Astana court, but about the reasons for closing became known only on September 25. According to officials, on this and a number of other sites was "propaganda of ideas of extremism and terrorism." Kazakh filmmakers, photographers and specialists in the field of advertising - the main users of the resource Vimeo - responded to lock the resource with anxiety, explaining it by the fact that they are using video hosting for professional purposes, are placed where their portfolio and are paid about 100 euros per year for an account with a more diverse functionality.
Documentary filmmaker Katerina Suvorova says that in ten years to use video sharing it never came across information "terrorist nature". In her opinion, this content you need to look very targeted. "In contrast to the same YouTube, Vimeo is considered to be more convenient for hosting professionals. the resource idea is to spread materials that only the authors of the product. Therefore, as a rule, there are not caught occasional videos and also before the publication they are serious moderation. It is thanks to Vimeo, living in Kazakhstan, I have the opportunity to work in their profession, "- said Suvorov. Videographers and filmmakers use Vimeo to a password-protected movie downloads for a selection panels of film festivals.
It is worth noting that the leadership of the declared sites, where materials of "terrorist nature" were found already complied and removed the problematic video. When reporters tried to go through the anonymizer to pages listed in the court's decision, immediately after the document was made public, they have not found them. However, resource locking lasted until 14 October.
Locking the entire platform is considered the "aggravating factor" in assessing the level of Internet freedom. In the winter of last year, the viral spread of the Internet and the world received the news video, where dozens of children, allegedly from Kazakhstan are trained in a camp of radical Islamists LIH. Then the Kazakh authorities have reacted like lightning and become massively close sources have placed the video. In this case only the pages blocked and not entirely sites. According to Sabirov, as Vimeo works on the https secure protocol, providers harder to block individual pages, although it is not impossible.
Also Vimeo, inaccessible in Kazakhstan were also a popular photo sharing site Flickr, Dailymotion video hosting and microblogging platform Tumblr, although these sites were not in the list of resources that are prohibited by a court decision. However, recently Flickr, Tumblr.com become available. In the spring of 2015, Kazakhstan blocked music and podcast hosting Soundcloud of materials "Hizb-ut-Tahrir» extremist organization (access was restored after the removal of the disputed recordings).
In a recent story of TV channel "Khabar" representatives of the management of monitoring for Investment and Development of the Ministry of informprostranstva reported that illegal information is spread mainly through Facebook, youtube and Twitter - and therefore these services are at risk of being blocked in Kazakhstan.
According to Freedom House director of the office in Victoria Tyuleneva Kazakhstan, freedom of expression is highly controlled in Kazakhstan. Previously internet space was considered freer than traditional media, the recent developments show that the authorities are not going to tolerate criticism and dissent online as well as offline:
"In my opinion, this is due to sharply deteriorating economic situation in the country, which has become a critical catalyst for sentiment in Kazakh society. Ordinary people began to reflect on the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the policy, to share ideas on the web, read more intelligence and critical materials. Authorities this may seem a challenge to the stability of the regime. To them, it is the risk that must be minimized, and preferably eliminated. ".
Materials Network regulation in Kazakhstan:
The law on the protection of children from harmful information found in Kazakhstan is not consistent with the Constitution
Kazakhstan, Russia copies the regression Internet legislation bans and locks
Kazakh-language portal does not agree with the sanctions Roskomnadzor to it
===
哈薩克斯坦成為大規模封鎖的網站
作為報告的 “Kazakhstanskaya真理報”，以阻止在哈薩克斯坦站點申請過時的方法，這導致限制訪問不僅對網頁中的判定，但也他人，其與IP地址相一致。 許多哈薩克斯坦萬維網用戶想知道為什麼共和國拒絕訪問某些國外網站。
“Kazakhstanskaya真理報”試圖找出的局勢“Samruk-卡濟納”JSC的子公司哪些是國家JSC“Kazakhtelecom”的主要電信運營商，並要求在哈薩克斯坦互聯網協會專家意見的原因。
注意，該請求被吸引“Kazakhtelecom”，它2015年8月發問題的資源列表為在18訂戶的編輯的基礎上作出的。 列表包括17資源，獲得其中已經部分或完全阻塞。 其中包括：互聯網檔案館archive.org ，國際請願網站Avaaz.org ，俄羅斯信息娛樂門戶網站fresher.ru ，英國每日郵報現場dailymail.co.uk ，國際新聞社fergananews.com ，國際照片共享網站flickr.com ，博客liveinternet.ru ，訪問哪些是定期封鎖博客livejournal.com ，網站作家列昂尼德Kaganova lleo.me ，俄羅斯最大的門戶網站的文學，它提供了作家的作品出版自由的可能性proza.ru ，國際信息門戶reddit.com ，現代文學服務器“地下出版物”在圖書館Moshkova samlib.ru ，媒體內容下載網站SaveFrom.net ，在斯多葛主義哲學的門戶網站方向stoicallyspeaking.org ，字典英語俚語，口頭禪，方言urbandictionary.com ，音樂家和詩人揚佳吉列夫的存儲位置yanka.lenin .MOBI ，幽默網站zagony.ru 。 而且還必須使用谷歌的麻煩- photohosting picasa.ru和博客谷歌+。
作為資產管理«Samruk-卡濟納»努爾然Baidauletov，鎖定/首席解鎖在線資源是“Kazakhtelecom”只能通過法院命令。 國家運營商通過IP地址限制訪問網站。
然而，JSC“Kazakhtelecom”無法解釋為什麼他的訂戶有困難訪問其他下面的資源和服務。
哈薩克斯坦互聯網協會澄清為何獲得阻止錯誤的地址的網站，並通過IP。
“通過IP地址阻塞 - 一個古老而眾所周知的方法。 今天，當然，你可以很容易地按域名限制訪問。 唯一的區別是，該域名可以容易地改變，並繼續其工作。 那麼法院的執行沒有在域名和觀點內容角度來講沒有兌現。 但是，即使這種說法，可以回答，而該地址可以被改變了。 使上的IP地址的鎖是差多了，因為在這種情況下，阻止位於該地址的所有網站。 和一些相同的地址是成千上萬的網站數千或數万。 特別是，如果要說一下雲解決方案，還有IP尋址動態地移動，有時也不清楚什麼樣的地址塊“ - 說，該協會沙夫Sabirov的總統。
不過，他認為，問題也可能在於缺乏官員和法官的職權。
“操作員可能不知道它為什麼被限制IP地址的訪問，因為該判決已經來到了這種形式。 想像一下，坐在官方和寫依據法院判決的正式請求，而且很容易在IP地址寫的不是完全重複的域名。 或者誰決定法官，傻到域名更好的地址。 在這種情況下，判斷清晰，操作人員只需接受它，它是喜歡還是不喜歡“， - 專家說。
Sabirov對決策者呼籲能夠理解和公眾公開解釋互聯網資源的阻塞的原因。
“有鎖或限制訪問的情況近來已成為當務之急。 我們需要從根本上解決這個問題，“ - 強調了互聯網協會的會長。
不過，該協會回憶說，他曾多次提出禁止資源哈薩克斯坦境內名單正式出版的問題。 這樣的註冊表中存在，在俄羅斯reestr.rublacklist.net 。
由於通知在全國網上流傳的曙光- -門戶Digital.Report，哈薩克斯坦網絡鎖的歷史的開始日期被認為是1999年11月4日，當它成為不可能把反對派網站Eurasia.org.ru。 在哈薩克斯坦同樣塊的最著名的例子是關於獲得最流行的俄文博客平台“的LiveJournal”的禁令。 自2008年以來訪問關閉，當它開始它的主頁在法律總統努爾蘇丹·納扎爾巴耶夫，Rakhat阿利耶夫，後期的灰頭土臉。 三年來，該網站已被關閉，從哈薩克斯坦的用戶沒有法院命令任何官方解釋，只有在2011年8月阿斯塔納（後已經從“實時日報”輾轉博客阿利耶夫）的Saryarka區法院出具的決定據稱，官方封鎖該平台由於存在有“極端主義材料。”
許多反對派的在線出版物（“中華民國”，“看”，guljan.org）也阻斷長期正規的司法判決，這是然後完全禁止的活動的新聞隊伍之前。
過濾 - 以批判和政治上敏感的內容整體的web2.0平台的格式，和點鎖資源 - 加強了上個月。 9月9日被阻斷一個受歡迎的網站Ratel.kz，由獨立的記者在2013年創建的。 每天只需在線報紙Zonakz.net也是為讀者不可用。 在這種情況下，這些資源的擁有者仍然不知道他們被阻止什麼理由。 然而，近日就有可能去Zonakz.net - 再次，沒有任何解釋。
它提出了事件的兩個可能的版本。 第一 - 在哈薩克斯坦統治精英正在準備一項重大的政治變革。 可以採取用於測試某些阻擋技術，然後在適當的時候將被應用到所有其他在線媒體的當前的措施。 第二 - 它可能是數據網絡版允許導致一些權力精英的負反應的任何材料的出版。 在任何情況下，根據分析人員，當局的這些動作在本質上是不合法的。
“沒有阻止官方理由是不可接受的。 有法律，有規則是人人平等，無論是公民和公共機構。 事實上，國家本身應該是有利可圖的不玩捉迷藏，並與公眾尋找，誠實，公開談論的問題。 我們喜歡被封鎖的網站的空氣需要正式註冊，因為它是在俄羅斯實施。 在這樣決定的更高的透明度，就越容易在其與公共關係到狀態“。。
沙夫Sabirov，“哈薩克斯坦互聯網協會”（IAK）
在打擊極端主義的藉口被關閉，訪問託管Vimeo.com視頻。 在哈薩克斯坦鎖定資源決定通過9月7日阿斯塔納球場，但對原因收盤僅成為9月25日稱。 據官員，就這個問題和其他一些網站是“的極端主義和恐怖主義思想宣傳。” 哈製片人，攝影師和專業廣告領域 - 資源Vimeo的主要用戶 - 回應鎖定焦慮的資源，由一個事實，即他們正在使用的視頻託管專業用途解釋它，被放置在那裡他們的投資組合，並每年支付約100歐元的帳戶與更多樣化功能。
紀錄片導演卡捷琳娜Suvorova說，在十年使用視頻共享信息跨越“恐怖性”它永遠不會來了。 在她看來，這些內容你需要尋找非常有針對性。 “以相反同一的YouTube，Vimeo的被認為是託管的專業人員更方便。 資源想法是傳播的材料，只有產品的作者。 因此，作為一項規則，有沒有被卡住偶爾的視頻也公佈之前，他們是認真的審核。 正是由於到Vimeo，住在哈，我有機會在自己的專業工作，“ - 說蘇沃洛夫。 攝像師和製片人使用Vimeo的一個受密碼保護的電影下載電影節的選擇面板。
值得一提的是，申報地點，其中“恐怖主義性質的”材料被發現已遵守並刪除有問題的視頻的領導。 當記者試圖通過Anonymizer公司去在法院的判決中列出的頁面，文件被公開後，他們還沒有找到他們。 然而，資源鎖定，一直持續到10月14日。
鎖定整個平台被認為是在評估互聯網自由的水平“加重因素。” 去年冬天，互聯網的病毒式傳播和世界收到的新聞視頻，其中幾十個孩子，據稱哈薩克斯坦激進伊斯蘭分子儷的一個營地接受培訓。 然後，哈薩克斯坦當局的反應像閃電一樣，成為大規模靠近源放置了視頻。 在這種情況下，只有網頁中屏蔽，而不是完全的網站。 據Sabirov，如Vimeo的作品在https安全協議，供應商很難阻止單獨的頁面，但也不是沒有可能。
此外Vimeo的，人跡罕至的哈薩克斯坦也是一個流行的照片分享網站Flickr，土豆網視頻託管和微博平台的tumblr，雖然這些網站在被法院判決禁止的資源列表中則沒有。 然而，最近的Flickr，Tumblr.com變得可用。 在2015年的春天，哈薩克斯坦封鎖音樂和播客託管的材料的SoundCloud“Hizb-UT-解放»極端組織（訪問被拆除有爭議的錄音後恢復）。
在最近的一次電視頻道的故事“Khabar”監測投資informprostranstva部發展的管理層代表報告說，非法信息傳播主要是通過Facebook，YouTube和Twitter的 - 因此這些服務有可能被擋在哈薩克斯坦的風險。
據維多利亞Tyuleneva哈薩克斯坦辦公室自由之家主任，表達自由受到嚴格控制在哈薩克斯坦。 此前互聯網空間被認為比傳統媒體更自由，最近的事態發展表明，當局不會容忍批評和不同意見的在線和離線：
“在我看來，這是由於急劇惡化的國家，這已成為哈薩克斯坦社會情緒的一個關鍵催化劑的經濟形勢。 普通人開始反思的原因，政策的無效，在網絡上交流思想，了解更多智慧和關鍵材料。 當局這似乎是一個挑戰政權的穩定。 對他們來說，這是一個必須最小化，並且最好是淘汰的危險。“。
材料在哈薩克斯坦網絡監管：
從哈薩克斯坦發現有害信息保護兒童的法律不符合憲法
哈薩克斯坦，俄羅斯副本回歸互聯網的法律禁令和鎖
哈薩克語言門戶網站不會與制裁Roskomnadzor它同意
===
Bloomberg: Russians began to actively use Tor after locking rutrekere
One of the world's leading information resource, Bloomberg, has published an analysis of the situation with the blocking of the largest Russian torrent portal - Rutracker.org and subsequent user actions to restore your access to it.
The report says that according to Liveinternet, during the first week after the ban on the traffic tracker fell by less than 15 percent. On Sunday, in the busiest day for site rutrekere received 11 million visits, compared with an average of 13 million before the ban.
Bloomberg The publication notes that the Russians have found ways to circumvent the blocking.
At the same time, rutrekere advises its users, tools like CGI proxies, which allow them to continue to access the site. This software allows you to replace the user's location, so ISPs can not block their access. Similar methods are used by people around the world to obtain full access, for example, to Netflix and other services outside their home countries, where the content may be different from what is offered in the same company in other countries.
Many Russian people began to use the anonymous Tor network . The number of its users in Russia increased by 35% since the beginning of the year and as of February 1 totaled 250 thousand people (in fact. More - February 1, there were about 280 thousand, as of February 4 -. For more than 310 thousand -. Approx RosKomSvobody.) :
.
Bloomberg notes that the increasing control of the Internet space by the Russian President went beyond piracy. In 2014, Russia began to block websites with "extremist" content (it is the law 398-FZ ). Last year, Putin made global Internet companies to store personal data about Russian users on servers located in Russia ( 242-FZ ). The government also began to require bloggers to register with the local regulator ( 97-FL ).
The newspaper reminds that Roskomnadzor has previously said that users will eventually get bored and will bypass the lock to use such legal services as Netflix, iTunes, Google Music and their local clones Nevertheless, Russian officials may be overly optimistic.:
"I doubt that the Russians massively switch to legal services if the current recession and the fall of their incomes. In addition, the lock is fairly easy to get around and do torrent portals offer a wide and varied selection of content library ", - said Karen Ghazaryan, an analyst at RAEC.
===
彭博社：俄羅斯開始積極使用Tor鎖定rutrekere後
報告說，根據Liveinternet，在第一週後的流量跟踪禁令下降了不到15％。 上週日，在現場rutrekere的最繁忙的一天接待了11萬人次，平均1300萬的禁令前相比。
彭博該刊物指出，俄羅斯已經找到了繞過阻塞。
與此同時，rutrekere建議它的用戶，如CGI代理工具，這讓他們繼續訪問該網站。 該軟件允許你替換用戶的位置，讓互聯網服務提供商不能阻止其訪問。 類似的方法也用於全世界人民獲得充分接觸，例如，Netflix和其他服務自己的國家，那裡的含量可以是什麼提供在同一家公司在其他國家的不同之外。
許多俄羅斯人開始使用匿名Tor網絡 。 自今年年初在俄羅斯的用戶數量增長了35％，為2月1日共計25萬的人（其實 ， 更多 - 2月1日，共有約280萬人，為2月4日-在超過31萬-約RosKomSvobody） ：
。
彭博社指出，由俄羅斯總統在互聯網空間的增加控制超出了盜版。 在2014年，俄羅斯開始封鎖“極端主義”的內容（這是法律網站398-FZ ）。 去年，普京全球互聯網企業存儲有關俄羅斯用戶在位於俄羅斯（服務器的個人資料242-FZ ）。 政府也開始要求博主與當地監管機構（註冊97-FL ）。
該報提醒Roskomnadzor此前曾表示，用戶最終會感到厭煩，並會繞過使用這些法律服務的Netflix，iTunes中，谷歌音樂和當地的克隆不過，俄羅斯官員可能過於樂觀鎖：
“我懷疑是俄羅斯大規模切換到法律服務，如果當前的經濟衰退，收入的下滑。 此外，鎖是很容易解決，做洪流門戶網站提供內容庫的“廣泛而多樣的選擇， - 說在一個RAEC分析師Karen Ghazaryan。
===
Israel Announces $26 Million Cyberattack on Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement and Muslims in the West
February
The initiative was reported last week by Associated Press journalist Daniel Estrin, who told AlterNet he was personally invited to cover a private cyber technology forum for Israeli developers last month.
BDS is an international movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel until it abides by international legal conventions. Sparked by Palestinian civil society organizations' call in 2005 for global tactics similar to those levied to topple apartheid in South Africa, BDS has attracted international support from artists, scholars, students, and human rights campaigners. The Boycott National Committee recently argued that the massive resources that Israel is devoting to countering the movement shows that “our 'soft' power is having a real impact," and with good reason: Even presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has publicly attacked BDS and pledged to fight it.
Estrin's reporting on the costly initiative to counter the growing movement included in this year's Israeli government budget is hazy on details. He describes a scheme hatched by “some of Israel's top secret-keepers, including Sima Shine, a former top official in the Mossad spy agency, and Vaknin-Gil, who recently retired as the chief military censor responsible for gag orders on state secrets.” Israel's Ministry for Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy, which Vaknin-Gil now heads, as well as its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, are involved in the effort.
Among the orchestrators of the anti-BDS spying initiative is Elad Ratson, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs official not exactly known for his diplomatic style. Ratson has been given to outbursts on social media, including threatening imagery of a bomb attack sent to at least one French website that has battled Islamophobia.
According to Estrin's report in AP, Ratson identified Muslim social media users on foreign soil as key targets of the spying plan:
Many online activists driving anti-Israeli campaigns on social media are tech-savvy, second- and third-generation Muslims in Europe and the US who have grievances against the West and also lead online campaigns against European and US governments, said Elad Ratson, who tracks the issue for Israel's Foreign Ministry and spoke at last month's cybersecurity forum.Reached by email, the AP's Estrin said the covert Israeli plan to sabotage BDS was unveiled at a conference at which "other journalists were also present," but declined to answer whether it was open to all members of the press. He referred many of AlterNet's questions to Ratson, whom he described as "a nice guy."
He said they often create code that allows activists to blast thousands of messages from social media accounts — creating the illusion that many protesters are sharing the same anti-Israel or anti-West message online.
Ratson did not immediately respond to a question submitted over social media about who exactly will fall under the spying dragnet and for what reasons.
Amid a time of heightened alert for Muslims in Europe and the US, the Israeli plan is already raising alarm. “These efforts are a cynical attempt by Israel to exploit the anti-Muslim environment in the United States to further its widespread agenda to silence criticism of Israel, on whatever platform it appears,” Rahul Saksena, staff attorney for advocacy organization Palestine Legal, told AlterNet . “We have already seen students, and Muslim students in particular, targeted by Israel advocacy groups for exercising their legal right to advocate for Palestinian human rights. This initiative will be sure to heighten the surveillance regime against them in chilling ways.”
Estrin, for his part, did not raise civil rights concerns in his article over the targeting of Muslims. What's more, the reporter invoked the spectre of the "Islamic State" seemingly out of the blue, conflating the global terror organization with Muslims who criticize Western foreign policy.
Estrin wrote in the article:
Ratson said social media giants are beginning to close inciting users' accounts. Twitter said in a statement this month that since mid-2015, it has closed more than 125,000 accounts that were "threatening or promoting terrorist acts, primarily related to ISIS," the Islamic State group. But he said Islamist activists are simply moving to "Darknet" sites not visible on the open internet.However flawed his framing might have been, Estrin's reporting makes one thing clear: The Israeli crackdown is poised to escalate its campaign to unprecedented levels. An unknown number of Israeli tech companies are threatening to unleash a wave of cyber-attacks, including “sly algorithms to restrict these online activists' circle of influence” as well as “forensic intelligence gathering, such as detecting digital or semantic signatures buried in activists' coding so they are able to track and restrict their online activity.”
Those acts of sabotage will take place alongside a flood of “content that puts a positive face on Israel.”
The non-profit Firewall Israel, sponsored by a government-linked think tank known as the Reut Institute, is "building an online platform to help pro-Israel activists around the world communicate about anti-Israel activism in their communities,” the article states.
As journalist Ali Abunimah pointed out in 2010, the Reut institute aggressively pressed the Israeli government six years ago to embrace a strategy of sabotaging what it referred to as the “Delegitimation Network,” which is “made up of the broad, decentralized and informal movement of peace and justice, human rights, and BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) activists all over the world."
According to the think tank's argument, paraphrased by Abunimah, “Its manifestations include protests against Israeli officials visiting universities, Israeli Apartheid Week, faith-based and trade union-based activism, and 'lawfare' — the use of universal jurisdiction to bring legal accountability for alleged Israeli war criminals.”
Reut materials from as recently as June of 2015 show that the think tank is calling for surveillance of Muslim communities specifically. The institute says that the “delegitimization of Israel” has been “primarily driven by the so-called 'red-green alliance' between the radical left-wing and Muslim groups, which has been effectively building coalitions with mainstream groups.” Disturbingly, Reut goes on to argue that the very presence of Muslims in Europe poses a demographic threat to Israel, writing that “in Europe, the demographic rise of the Muslim community is transforming the public sphere against Israel and the Jews.”
===
彭博社：俄羅斯開始積極使用Tor鎖定rutrekere後
作為世界領先的信息資源，彭博的已發表的分析與阻塞形勢的俄羅斯最大的洪流門戶網站- Rutracker.org和後續用戶操作您訪問恢復它。
報告說，根據Liveinternet，在第一週後的流量跟踪禁令下降了不到15％。 上週日，在現場rutrekere的最繁忙的一天接待了11萬人次，平均1300萬的禁令前相比。
彭博該刊物指出，俄羅斯已經找到了繞過阻塞。
與此同時，rutrekere建議它的用戶，如CGI代理工具，這讓他們繼續訪問該網站。 該軟件允許你替換用戶的位置，讓互聯網服務提供商不能阻止其訪問。 類似的方法也用於全世界人民獲得充分接觸，例如，Netflix和其他服務自己的國家，那裡的含量可以是什麼提供在同一家公司在其他國家的不同之外。
許多俄羅斯人開始使用匿名Tor網絡 。 自今年年初在俄羅斯的用戶數量增長了35％，為2月1日共計25萬的人（其實 ， 更多 - 2月1日，共有約280萬人，為2月4日-在超過31萬-約RosKomSvobody） ：
。
彭博社指出，由俄羅斯總統在互聯網空間的增加控制超出了盜版。 在2014年，俄羅斯開始封鎖“極端主義”的內容（這是法律網站398-FZ ）。 去年，普京全球互聯網企業存儲有關俄羅斯用戶在位於俄羅斯（服務器的個人資料242-FZ ）。 政府也開始要求博主與當地監管機構（註冊97-FL ）。
該報提醒Roskomnadzor此前曾表示，用戶最終會感到厭煩，並會繞過使用這些法律服務的Netflix，iTunes中，谷歌音樂和當地的克隆不過，俄羅斯官員可能過於樂觀鎖：
“我懷疑是俄羅斯大規模切換到法律服務，如果當前的經濟衰退，收入的下滑。 此外，鎖是很容易解決，做洪流門戶網站提供內容庫的“廣泛而多樣的選擇， - 說在一個RAEC分析師Karen Ghazaryan。
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160225/19504701
Most of the world people are against violence, but violence in human society, but everywhere. There are two types of human society of violence, bullying is a violence that the perpetrators, one is against the perpetrators of the violence were. Thieves rob and kill guy, it was the perpetrator, the parties take the sticks knife in self-defense, it is the violence by. Bruiser raped weak woman, it is the perpetrator, weak woman caught stone scissors fight, that's uprising. It has always been a strong perpetrators, and those living uprising weak, so little self-defense killer, who killed and more than a self-defense.
On the composition of human society, the violence legitimate violence, illegal violence. Legitimate means of violence by the state, the regime has military, police, special, and prosecution, courts and other judiciary; unlawful violence refers to all social violence is not a legitimate scope of violence. In general, the formation of a legitimate violence, in order to maintain social order. Gun seizure of power by political parties, there are violent nature worship.
Continental dictionary definition of Marxism-Leninism, saying "the State is a tool of class rule" that capitalist society by the rule of the bourgeoisie, the state machine of violence is the rule of the proletariat and people tools; the proletariat is the dictatorship of the proletariat ruling assets in countries, national class and opponents tool. But the proletariat actually a famous name, the real rulers of the Communists won power. National definitions universal, territory, people, sovereignty of the three constituent. The sovereignty of the people means: If the enforcement of the Constitution does not protect the freedoms and rights of the people, the existence of the state does not make sense.
Even the national sovereignty of the people, because there are different interest groups in society, those in power have to consider the interests of political parties or individual politicians, and therefore also produce as Haruki Murakami said, "They must have systems to protect us, but sometimes it kill us or forcing us cold, efficient, systematic killing others. "Faced with this institutional violence, social violence of those who appear are common.
As for the authoritarian political state, no mandate from the people, national legal violence against the press is even more unscrupulous people. China has over the years tens of thousands of groups uprising events. These events uprising, of course, breaks against, of course, no chance of winning, of course, is the use of violence itself. But violence and violent uprising of violence we can not morally condemn without distinction.
Mr James talked about the current situation in Hong Kong two days ago, he said, "Mr. Leung strong governance, the Government and the people open sun sheet pan, so greatly increased social grievances." "Open sun sheet" is institutional violence. Guan Ying Yi people are talking about three minutes, including seven police beating Zhu Jingwei batons and the violence "watery sun shadow" are institutional violence. Irrational electoral system produced by the Legislative Council, formed a majority faction violence is institutional violence. Mr James said, "ultimately caused the outbreak of unrest in Mong Kok, Leung Chun-ying all come up with a come out and walk." Institutional violence is exactly talking about the uprising led to a causal action: There are only violent uprising.
All actions uprising breaks against all the world, has never won. Violent or nonviolent struggle are likely to make civilized regime to change course, but do not ignore the brutal regime. When almost all peace protests are ineffective when the uprising naturally tends to become aggressive, even incompetent. If the condemnation of violence, the violence on a par with the uprising, the effect is equivalent to the late pro-general Wu Wai-yung of Hong Kong people's advice: "If destined to be raped, ...!
Li Yi published Monday through Friday
https://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160225/19504701
世界上絕大多數人都反對暴力，然而暴力在人類社會卻無處不在。人類社會的暴力有兩種，一種是以強凌弱的暴力，即施暴者，一種是抵禦施暴者的抗暴者。賊佬殺
人搶劫，那是施暴者，當事人拿棍棒菜刀自衞，那是抗暴者。彪形大漢強暴弱女子，那是施暴者，弱女子抓到石頭剪刀抗擊，那是抗暴者。從來都是施暴者具強勢，
而抗暴者居弱勢，因此少有自衞殺人者，而多有自衞喪命者。
就人類社會的組成來說，暴力有合法暴力，有非法暴力。合法暴力指由國家、政權擁有的軍、警、特，還有檢察、法院等司法機關；非法暴力指所有不屬合法暴力範圍的社會暴力。一般來說，合法暴力的組成，是為了維持社會秩序。靠槍桿子奪取政權的政黨，有崇拜暴力的天性。
大 陸辭書根據馬列的定義，說「國家是階級統治的工具」，認為資本主義社會由資產階級統治，國家暴力機器是統治無產階級和人民的工具；在無產階級專政國家，國 家就是無產階級統治資產階級和反對者的工具。但無產階級其實虛有其名，實質統治者是奪得政權的共產黨人。普世的國家定義，是領土、人民、主權三者的構成。 而主權在民的意思就是：如果憲法的實施不能保護人民的自由和人權，國家的存在就沒有意義。
即使主權在民的國家，由於社會上有不同利益集團，掌權者有政黨或從政者個人利益的考慮，因此也會產生如村上春樹所說，「體制照理應該保護我們，但有時它卻殘殺我們，或迫使我們冷酷、有效率、系統化地殘殺別人。」面對這種體制暴力，社會出現抗暴者是常有的事。
至於專權政治的國家，沒有人民的授權，國家的合法暴力對人民的壓榨就更加肆無忌憚了。大陸歷年都有數以萬計的群體抗暴事件。這些抗暴事件，當然是以卵擊石，當然沒有勝算，本身也當然是使用暴力。但我們在道德上不能把施暴的暴力與抗暴的暴力不作區別地譴責。
田 北俊前兩天談到香港現況，他說，「梁振英強硬管治，政府同泛民開晒片，令社會怨氣大增」。「開晒片」就是體制暴力。市民關穎怡三分鐘所講，包括七警打人、 朱經緯警棍和這些暴力事件「冇晒影」，都是體制暴力。由不合理的選舉制度產生的立法會，建制派形成多數暴力，也是體制暴力。田北俊說，「終致旺角爆發騷 動，全部梁振英一個搞出嚟」。所講的正正是體制暴力導致抗暴行動的因果：有施暴才有抗暴。
世界上一切抗暴行動都是以卵擊石，從來沒有贏過。暴力或 非暴力抗爭有可能促使文明政體改弦易轍，但野蠻政權就不理會。當幾乎所有和平抗爭都無效的時候，抗暴自然會趨激進，那怕力有不逮。倘若一味譴責暴力，把抗 暴與施暴等量齊觀，其效果就等同已故親共大將鄔維庸對香港人的勸告：「如果注定被人強姦，...!
李怡
周一至周五刊出
https://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee
就人類社會的組成來說，暴力有合法暴力，有非法暴力。合法暴力指由國家、政權擁有的軍、警、特，還有檢察、法院等司法機關；非法暴力指所有不屬合法暴力範圍的社會暴力。一般來說，合法暴力的組成，是為了維持社會秩序。靠槍桿子奪取政權的政黨，有崇拜暴力的天性。
大 陸辭書根據馬列的定義，說「國家是階級統治的工具」，認為資本主義社會由資產階級統治，國家暴力機器是統治無產階級和人民的工具；在無產階級專政國家，國 家就是無產階級統治資產階級和反對者的工具。但無產階級其實虛有其名，實質統治者是奪得政權的共產黨人。普世的國家定義，是領土、人民、主權三者的構成。 而主權在民的意思就是：如果憲法的實施不能保護人民的自由和人權，國家的存在就沒有意義。
即使主權在民的國家，由於社會上有不同利益集團，掌權者有政黨或從政者個人利益的考慮，因此也會產生如村上春樹所說，「體制照理應該保護我們，但有時它卻殘殺我們，或迫使我們冷酷、有效率、系統化地殘殺別人。」面對這種體制暴力，社會出現抗暴者是常有的事。
至於專權政治的國家，沒有人民的授權，國家的合法暴力對人民的壓榨就更加肆無忌憚了。大陸歷年都有數以萬計的群體抗暴事件。這些抗暴事件，當然是以卵擊石，當然沒有勝算，本身也當然是使用暴力。但我們在道德上不能把施暴的暴力與抗暴的暴力不作區別地譴責。
田 北俊前兩天談到香港現況，他說，「梁振英強硬管治，政府同泛民開晒片，令社會怨氣大增」。「開晒片」就是體制暴力。市民關穎怡三分鐘所講，包括七警打人、 朱經緯警棍和這些暴力事件「冇晒影」，都是體制暴力。由不合理的選舉制度產生的立法會，建制派形成多數暴力，也是體制暴力。田北俊說，「終致旺角爆發騷 動，全部梁振英一個搞出嚟」。所講的正正是體制暴力導致抗暴行動的因果：有施暴才有抗暴。
世界上一切抗暴行動都是以卵擊石，從來沒有贏過。暴力或 非暴力抗爭有可能促使文明政體改弦易轍，但野蠻政權就不理會。當幾乎所有和平抗爭都無效的時候，抗暴自然會趨激進，那怕力有不逮。倘若一味譴責暴力，把抗 暴與施暴等量齊觀，其效果就等同已故親共大將鄔維庸對香港人的勸告：「如果注定被人強姦，...!
李怡
周一至周五刊出
https://www.facebook.com/mrleeyee
===
*-[25/02-2016] On''Twitter our friendly chivalrous Anonymous "YURI", he still do not reply our tweet' - but he always gives us a lot of good information to share ah! "YURI" gave us know Facebook's ''superior technology'', the "Superman" Kelvin "~He let us benefit! why do our search toolbar the" favorites function '' leave so much...!'- Is who ' brother' gave us to share??!-
http://melodyanony-anti-global-authoritarian.blogspot.com/2016/02/2502-2016-ontwitter-our-friendly.html
===Melody===FOLLOW FOLLOW===>/
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
