===
#wtf ,, #lmf
,,
#OpHongKong ,, #OpHongKongDAB ,, #OpHKRealEstateCunningMerchants ,,
#OpChina ,, #OpLeungChunYing ,,
#OpXiJinPing ,,
#OpNaziTrump ,, #OpIRAN
,, #OpNKorean ,,
#OpISIS ,,
#Op_Tibet #freetibet #savetibet
,,
---------------
#saveSyria ,, #saveTurkey
,, #saveJapan ,, #saveUkraine ,, #GodBlessCanada ,,
#GodBlessTaiwan ,, GodBlessParis
,, #GlodBlessAmerican ,,
#Hastings
,, #HumanRight ,,
#AnonFamily .
YURI 已轉推
Tom Lincolin
YURI 已轉推
BannedOffline
http://anonhq.com/ Is Now Under Massive DDoS For Profiting Off Anonymous #GhostSquadHackers Shit Has Spreadshirt Shop and CPA.
YURI 已轉推
HABİR KANMAZ
HABİR KANMAZ 已轉推
YURI 已轉推
To @David_Cameron,
You are in no position where you can predict the future of Turkey. How dare you..
#opportunist #shameless #politician
YURI 已轉推
★Polish Cyber Army★
YURI 已轉推
Reuters THT
YURI 已轉推
The Hacker News
Chinese
national Xu Jiaqiang, 30, was arrested by the FBI in December last
year, when he was charged with just one count of theft of a trade
secret.
However, Jiaqiang has been charged with six counts: three counts of economic espionage and three counts of theft of a trade secret, as US prosecutors accused him of selling the stolen information to other companies, according to the Justice Department indictment [PDF].
However, Jiaqiang has been charged with six counts: three counts of economic espionage and three counts of theft of a trade secret, as US prosecutors accused him of selling the stolen information to other companies, according to the Justice Department indictment [PDF].
The proprietary source code, which Jiaqiang was intended to sell for the benefit of the Chinese government, has been described as "a product of decades of work."
Jiaqiang worked as a software developer for an unnamed American company that developed networking software from November 2010 to May 2014.
In May 2014, Jiaqiang resigned the company only to sell the code stolen from his former employer to two undercover law enforcement agents, and not only this, but the DOJ said he also planned to share the source code to the National Health and Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.
Jiaqiang reportedly told the agents that he "could take steps to prevent detection of the proprietary software’s origins [source code], including writing computer scripts which would modify the proprietary source code to conceal its origins," the Justice Department said.
Though the DOJ did not name the employer who is widely reported to be a software engineer at IBM, the source code in question was a clustered file system that helps the performance of a computer "by coordinating work among multiple servers."
If convicted, Jiaqiang could face up to 75 years in prison, as each of the three counts of espionage and each of the three counts of theft of a trade secret carry a maximum sentence of 15 years and 10 years in prison, respectively.
Mr. Jiaqiang is set to answer the charges in the United States on Thursday 16 June.
===
中國國家徐夾牆，30，被美國聯邦調查局在去年十二月被捕，他被指控只是一個商業秘密盜竊的罪名。
然而，夾牆已被控六項罪名：經濟間諜活動的三項罪名和商業秘密盜竊三項罪名，因為美國檢察官指控他出售竊取的信息給其他公司，根據美國司法部的起訴書[ PDF ]。
專有的源代碼，其中夾牆旨在為中國政府的利益出賣，被形容為“十年工作的產物。”
陳家強擔任軟件開發是開發網絡軟件從2010年11月至2014年5月一位不願透露姓名的美國公司。
在2014年5月，張家強辭去公司僅出售從他的前雇主偷來的兩個便衣執法人員的代碼，不僅如此，但美國司法部說，他還打算共享源代碼的國家衛生計劃委員會中華人民共和國。
據報導，張家強告訴代理人，他“可以採取措施防止專有軟件的起源[源代碼]，包括編寫將要修改的專有源代碼來掩蓋它的起源計算機腳本檢測，”司法部說 。
雖然司法部沒有點名誰是廣泛報導，以IBM的一名軟件工程師，雇主，有問題的源代碼是一個集群文件系統，可以幫助計算機的性能“通過協調多個服務器之間的工作。”
如果罪名成立，夾牆可能面臨高達75年的監禁，因為每一個間諜的三項罪名中，每一個商業秘密被盜的三項罪名攜帶15年和10年有期徒刑最高刑期分別。
陳家強先生被設定為在回答美國的指控上月16日。
===
YURI 已轉推
HABİR KANMAZ 已轉推 Reuters THT
TEAM CYMRU
PhotoMiner Worm Spreads via Vulnerable FTP Servers, Mines for Crypto-Currency #cybersecurity http://bit.ly/1rnfmjz
#cybersecurity
#DODDarkAngel 和其他 17 人 個跟隨者
Anon SLY Team News 3 小時前
25,000-strong CCTV botnet used for crippling DDoS attacks (via NewsfusionApps #Cybersecurity News)
One theory, still unconfirmed, about how the attackers managed to rope these devices into a botnet is that they were hacked via a recently disclosed RCE vulnerability in CCTV-DVRs.
Another interesting discovery was that the compromised cameras are able to emulate normal behavior of most popular browsers, in an attempt to make it more difficult for defenders to identify and block the malicious requests.
The compromised CCTV cameras are located in Taiwan, USA, Indonesia, Mexico, Malysia, Israel, Italy, and so on.
The researchers have been reaching out to networks on which the cameras are located, trying to get admins to clean them up, patch them, and isolate them from the Internet. Still, they are aware that the botnet herders will easily find other cameras – and other vulnerable IoT devices – to rope into their malicious network.
“It is not new that attackers have been using IoT devices to start their DDoS campaigns, however, we have not analyzed one that leveraged only CCTV devices and was still able to generate this quantity of requests for so long,” Sucuri CTO Daniel Cid pointed out.
Some IoT botnets are used for other things, like Bitcoin mining.
Security flaws, misconfiguration, and pure and simple ignorance about the dangers of keeping IoT devices connected to the Internet while unsecured is what will keep these botnets functioning for years to come.
===
有一種理論，仍未經證實，對攻擊者是如何設法拉攏這些設備變成殭屍網絡是他們通過最近披露砍死在CCTV-DVR的RCE漏洞 。
另一個有趣的發現是，在受感染的相機都能夠仿效的最流行的瀏覽器的正常行為，以試圖使其更難以維護者識別和阻斷惡意請求。
被感染的閉路電視攝影機設在台灣，美國，印度尼西亞，墨西哥，Malysia，以色列，意大利，等等。
研究人員已經深入到對攝像機所定位的網絡，試圖讓管理員清除它們，修補它們，並從互聯網上隔離。 不過，他們都知道，殭屍網絡牧民會很容易找到其他的相機 - 和其他弱勢物聯網設備 - 拉攏到他們的惡意網絡。
“這是不是新的 ，攻擊者已經利用物聯網設備開始他們的DDoS活動，但是，我們有沒有分析一個槓桿只有CCTV設備和依然能產生請求這個量這麼久，”Sucuri首席技術官丹尼爾·熙指出出。
一些物聯網殭屍網絡被用於其他的東西，如比特幣挖掘。
安全缺陷 ，錯誤配置，以及關於保持連接到互聯網的物聯網設備，而擔保是什麼將保留這些殭屍網絡在今後幾年工作的危險單純無知。
===
These DVRs are regularly connected to the Internet and/or the organization’s LAN, so that they can be accessed remotely in case of need. Naturally, this means that malicious actors could also stumble upon them and try to hack them to gain an initial foothold into an organization’s network.
Kerner found this particular vulnerability in the device firmware of a DVR sold by an Israeli company, but further analysis of the firmware code revealed comments suggesting that the code was made in China.
This spurred Kerner to find its true origin and, as it turns out, the real manufacturer is a Chinese company called TVT. But he also discovered that there are over 70 vendors reselling almost identical DVRs.
“They may have different logo, or slightly different plastics, but they share the same vulnerable software. This is basically what they call ‘white labeling’ – probably China’s most common business model,” he noted.
He says he repeatedly tried to contact TVT to share his finding, but that they are ignoring him, so he decided to share this information with the public.
Which ones are affected?
He included the list of vendors (but not the specific products), as well as techical details about the exploitation process and the exploit itself in a blog post. The vulnerability exists within the implementation of the HTTP server included in the firmware, and exploitation of it can result in the attacker gaining root access to the DVR. This implementation opens ports 81/82 of the device to the Internet, and with a simple Shodan query Kerner discovered over 30,000 of these devices (just by that vendor) deployed around the world.The fact that this same software is used by so many different vendors, and TVT doesn’t seem eager to make the needed changes, makes it likely that most of those systems will never be patched.
“I believe there are few more vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild against these machines and therefore your best shot would probably be to deny any connection from an unknown IP address to the DVR services,” Kerner concluded.
Of course, this is just one vulnerability – who knows how many are still there, undiscovered or, worse yet, discovered and exploited? A relatively recent study into the security of the Internet of Things has confirmed that embedded firmware images and web interfaces for user administration of commercial, off-the-shelf embedded devices – routers, DSL/cable modems, VoIP phones, IP/CCTV cameras – represent a significant attack surface.
===
克納發現由一家以色列公司出售了DVR的設備固件此特定漏洞，但固件代碼的進一步分析顯示評論暗示代碼是在中國製造的。
這促使克納找到真正的來源，並且事實證明，真正的生產廠家是中國一家名為TVT 。 但他也發現，有超過70多家廠商倒賣幾乎相同的DVR。
“他們可以具有不同的標誌，或稍有不同的塑料，但他們共享相同的脆弱的軟件。 這基本上是他們所謂的“白色標籤” - 也許中國最常見的商業模式，“他說。
他說，他多次試圖聯繫TVT分享了他的發現，而是因為他們被忽略了他，於是他決定與公眾分享這些信息。
哪些會受到影響？
他包括供應商（而不是具體的產品）的列表，以及有關的開發過程介紹技術細節和利用自身在博客文章 。 該漏洞包含在固件中的HTTP服務器實現中存在，它的開採可能會導致攻擊者獲得root訪問權限的DVR。 此實現打開端口的設備的81/82到互聯網，並以簡單的初段查詢肯納發現在這些設備（只是由該供應商）部署在世界各地的30,000。這同樣的軟件是由許多不同的廠商使用，並且TVT似乎並不急於進行所需的更改的事實，很可能使大多數的系統將永遠不會被修補。
“我相信很少有更多的漏洞在打擊這些機器野外被利用，因此你最好的出手很可能會拒絕來自一個未知IP地址DVR服務的任何聯繫，”克納結束。
當然，這只是其中的一個漏洞 - 誰知道有多少仍然存在，或未被發現，更糟糕的是，發現並利用？ 一個相對較新的研究到物聯網的安全性已經確認嵌入式固件映像和網絡接口的用戶管理商業，現成的，貨架嵌入式設備-路由器，DSL /電纜調製解調器，VoIP電話，IP / CCTV攝像機-代表顯著攻擊面。
===
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160621/19662777
[ "Apple" reporter Guangxi Yulin Watch]
Today is the summer solstice, but it Yulin people today is that they 'eat dog meat feast "day. The annual "Lychee dog Yulin Festival" kicked off today, which is locally known as traditional practices, despite endless protests at home and abroad, the annual even in one year, or even the day before Xi Jinping arrived in Poland for a state visit, the "dog Yulin Festival" also local people to become learning protest slogans, but not affect Yulin people today still slaughter, bites.
Yulin dog eve festival, Chinese President Xi Jinping to visit Warsaw on the 19th local time, for a state visit.
Probably even the Chinese Embassy officials also unexpected, Xi Jinping
say "no", as well as the local animal protection groups.
Appeared on the 18th in front of the Chinese Embassy in the group of
demonstrators, some people hold high the "Cruelty! Not Tradition! STOP
YULIN!" (Cruel! Not traditional! Yulin stop (dog section)!)
Demonstrations cards face up animal requires China rights and interests.
Joint promotion of millions of people banned dog meat festival
However, top leaders in the awkward encounter thousands of kilometers away without problems Yulin holidays. "Apple" Correspondent Zuodi Yulin Watch, see foreign reporters were blocked violence, reporters shot worse beating people with a knife threatening. Yulin dog festival held annually are brutal cold-blooded shelling and foreign, has become an international event, Guojiyulun continued to criticize China this "festival", tens of millions of people worldwide signed a petition endorsing China banned dog meat festival.Faced with incessant international lashing, although the official has been requested to do low-key folk dog section, but the locals in a small reason. In the most famous cooked dog meat market Yulin Dong export markets, still bloody pile up over the dogs on the barbecue shed stalls. Several foreign reporters and interested members of the animal rights organization, trying to approach and inspect the shooting, but then there are a large number of local markets and guards approached the siege, let them take pictures, are not allowed to even enter the market, there was chaos.
Dog sellers knife beat reporter shot
Dogs have to be transported Corpse see a foreigner, the dog immediately covered with a cloth. There are people with a smile: "dog meat is a must eat!" Even market staff have joined the ranks of foreigners stop constantly shot blocked their shots, and draped over their shoulders to "ask" them to leave. Staff brought them across the pavement, claiming that "dog Festival" is sponsored folk, the official did not participate, but requires them to be deleted in the market to take videos and photos.One shot is blocked foreign reporters afterwards Alex Hoffordjn "apple" reporter said that this was his first visit to Yulin inspection "Dog Day", did not expect to encounter such harsh treatment. He recalled that there were a lot of local people around them, he wanted to be with my hand when taking lens, a woman with a knife pounded his lens, like a very scary. After claiming to have "market manager" asked them to leave. Then the reporter was also shirtless Han intimidation: "? What do you see here do not have something that makes you see, get out!" Was also forced out of the market.
[Users] have something to say
‧ is not conducive to the harmonious development of mankind, should not inherit!
‧ poor dog, slaughtered not eat, but also hurt China's international reputation.
‧ saw rescue dog rescue, dog eat your heart you feel better?
‧ evil is really a holiday!
‧ dog as long as legitimate sources, should respect the rights of the diet.
‧ poor dog, slaughtered not eat, but also hurt China's international reputation.
‧ saw rescue dog rescue, dog eat your heart you feel better?
‧ evil is really a holiday!
‧ dog as long as legitimate sources, should respect the rights of the diet.
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160621/19662777
【《蘋果》記者廣西玉林直擊】
今日是夏至，但對廣西玉林民眾來說，今日是他 們「大啖食狗肉」的日子。一年一度「玉林荔枝狗肉節」今日開鑼，當地人稱這是傳統習俗，儘管海內外抗議之聲不絕，年甚於一年，甚至習近平前日抵波蘭進行國 事訪問時，「玉林狗肉節」亦成為當地民眾向習示威抗議的口號，但無礙玉林人今日照樣大開殺戒，大快朵頤。
今日是夏至，但對廣西玉林民眾來說，今日是他 們「大啖食狗肉」的日子。一年一度「玉林荔枝狗肉節」今日開鑼，當地人稱這是傳統習俗，儘管海內外抗議之聲不絕，年甚於一年，甚至習近平前日抵波蘭進行國 事訪問時，「玉林狗肉節」亦成為當地民眾向習示威抗議的口號，但無礙玉林人今日照樣大開殺戒，大快朵頤。
玉林狗肉節前夕，中國國家主席習近平於當地時間19日到訪華沙，進行國事訪問。大概連中國大使館官員也料想不到，對習近平說「不」的，還有當地保護動物團
體。18日在中國大使館前出現的一批示威者中，有人就高舉「Cruelty！Not Tradition！STOP
YULIN！」（殘忍！不是傳統！玉林停止（狗肉節）！）的示威牌，要求中國正視動物權益。
千萬人聯署促取締狗肉節
不過，最高領導人在數千公里外的尷尬遭遇無礙玉林人過節。《蘋果》記者昨抵玉林直擊，見有外國記者遭暴力阻擋，記者鏡頭更遭民眾持刀敲打恐嚇。玉林狗肉節 每年舉行均被中外炮轟殘忍冷血，已成為國際事件，國際輿論不斷批評中國這個「節日」，全球過千萬人聯署要求中國取締狗肉節。面對國際鞭撻聲音不 斷，官方雖一直要求民間低調辦狗肉節，但當地人一於少理。在玉林最著名的熟食狗肉市場垌口市場，依然充滿血腥，攤檔上堆放脫毛燒烤過的狗隻。有幾名外國記 者及關注動物權益的組織成員，試圖進場視察並拍攝，但隨即有大批本地人及市場的警衞上前圍攻，不讓他們拍照，就連進入市場都不許，場面混亂。
狗販拿刀敲打記者鏡頭
有要運送狗屍者見到外國人，立即用布把狗蓋着。有民眾笑言：「狗肉是一定要吃的！」連市場工作人員也加入阻擋外國人行列，不斷出手擋他們的鏡頭，又搭着他 們的膊頭「請」他們離開。工作人員領他們到對面行人路，聲稱「狗肉節」是民間主辦，官方沒有參與，但要求他們刪去在市場拍到的影片及照片。其中一 名被擋鏡頭的外國記者Alex Hoffordjn事後對《蘋果》記者表示，這是他第一次到玉林視察「狗肉節」，想不到會遇上這樣粗暴的待遇。他憶述當時有不少當地人圍着他們，他想拍照 時被人用手擋鏡頭，有女子拿刀連續敲打他的鏡頭，狀甚嚇人。後有自稱「市場經理」要求他們離開。本報記者隨後亦被赤膊大漢恫嚇：「你看甚麼？這裏沒有東西 讓你看，快離開！」亦遭趕離市場。
【網民有話說】
‧不利於人類和諧發展的，就不應該繼承！
‧可憐的狗，被宰吃不算，還連累中國的國際聲譽。
‧看到搜救犬救人，吃狗的你心裏好受嗎？
‧真是一個萬惡的節日！
‧只要狗肉來源合法，應尊重飲食權利。
‧可憐的狗，被宰吃不算，還連累中國的國際聲譽。
‧看到搜救犬救人，吃狗的你心裏好受嗎？
‧真是一個萬惡的節日！
‧只要狗肉來源合法，應尊重飲食權利。
===
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1tZu-Tj7xwkz0AoEX08EaUZH3kHeHu4lwf3JZPFe6Zy0/viewform
Oppose "Network 23" strive to "open Waiver"
2011, the Government introduced the "Network 23" gives copyright holders' right of communication "that all acts of electronic means of communication to use copyright material included under the copyright law regulation. In Internet users strongly opposed, "Network 23" was finally pulled down. In 2013, the government adopted "Fair Dealing Fair dealing" exemptions of copyright are several specific mode of creation, that "parody", "satire", "imitation", "funny", "reference" and "reporting and commenting on current affairs . " We need to refer to "fair dealing Fair Dealing" is to limit the creation of the cage, users can only continue to be creative in the framework of government default, not to cross the utmost limit. Later, in addition to these exemptions creations, including serious cover, comic doujinshi, streaming playing computer, change a word in the lyric, all are not exempt, a criminal offense "Network 23" under. Undoubtedly, the so-called exemption simply limits freedom of expression and creation of sugar-coated poison.
Keyboard front and Rights Alliance and second creation for this proposed fourth program open to government exempt "user-derived UGC." When the end of the consultation, the Bills Committee has received more than 8,400 submissions, of which 90% supported "user-derived UGC." The American Intellectual Property Law Drake University Law School Professor Yu Jiaming has also repeatedly explained Open exemption "user-derived UGC" to the government how to comply with copyright law. Thereafter, Hosei Cyberwisdom also made into the United States follows the 30 years of open-exempt "fair use Fair Use", but all is not accepted by the Government.
The so-called government in civil immunity "Network 23" under the administration, apparently left hand to the copyright holder. In contrast to the UK the same exemption legislation, we found that the government deliberately omitted the "terms of the contract can not override copyright law copyright exemption man" (Contract override) the provisions in the legislation, which means users or available exemption under the copyright law without was accused of infringement, but still violate copyright grounds of contractual provisions to the users for civil claims. Visible, so-called civil immunity simply useless!
In recent years, the government has repeatedly to "dishonest use of computer crime" charges users. Even if the government argues that "dishonest use of computer crime" under copyright law does not apply. But we find in 2005 "Crash Emperor 'case, the government had pre-empt the copyright holder proposes to spend" dishonest use of computer crime "and the crime of criminal copyright charges alternately accused of criminal prosecution. Thus, the government premeditated the "Network 23" and "dishonest use of computer crime" fit, restrict network and become the strongest creative freedom full body!
Here, we strongly urge the government to:
1. in the "2014 Copyright (Amendment) Ordinance" clearly set out under "dishonest use of computer crime" does not apply to copyright law;
2. The exemption was added at all "exemption overriding contract terms" (Contract Override), so that the exemption limit copyright terms of the contract is invalid, given the real civil immunity; and
3. The introduction of "open Waiver" ( "UGC user-derived" and "fair use Fair Use") so that creation is not limited to certain kinds of practices, both balance the interests of copyright owners and protect the freedom of expression and creation.
We also urge Members to support the "Waiver overriding terms of the contract", "user-derived UGC" and "fair use Fair Use" Amendment Act. Such as amending the bill failed to get through, be sure to veto Members "Network 23", to express the government for "open Waiver" second creation and protection of a network of free determination.
Keyboard front, Rights and Union of Concerned second creation
December 2, 2015
As at 2015-12-03 17:00 HKT more than 180,000 signatories as of 2015-12-03 12:30 HKT more than 55,000 signatories but failed to set numerical repeated signed (if any)
So this provisional figures for reference only.
As at 2015-12-03 20:00 HKT
Part signatory unit (alphabetical ranking, alphabetical order, regardless of the left-right)
Secondary authorship Concern Group Gordon map area Jue Jue & Cat t "top management" magazine "Swire Pacific people do" facebook regional group "Sha Tin Sha Tin man thing" Facebook page area information "Wan Chai man thing" facebook area group "Shau Kei Wan Shau Kei Wan things people" facebook group DDED area
HKG Hong Kong newspaper reported swine Hong Kong Columns (Translated) Kit MAN @ kit da sketch
Kongish Daily "Port language daily" ThisAV.com Um dot dot dot
United Social Press Social Media Yes-news.com hot joint news Kowloon East political reform school Concern Group People Power Wave post-80s college road, known University Knowledge
Chloe Mary democratic classroom large local Society CUHK Department of Sociology, Yan Chai Hospital Lim Por Yen Secondary School Alumni National Education Concern Group six hundred seventeen civil anti-Communist takeover Charter anticolonial Facebok group Tuen Mun community groups concerned about young college student north Follow-off area parallel group moving north Taiwan source creative Man front coalition Taiwan Association for local democracy frontline agency doll keyboard democratic Union Citizens 'radio was born in troubled times page Renqi Bang Members' offices FB umbrella • Friends of poly umbrella Unity primary Lai vulgar channel reported meters Shatin community Shinkansen network Sha Tin Mans to good governance psychological colleagues reported Bianji Bu radiation conscience East Kowloon community concerns Cyberwisdom group Hosei Hosei Cyberwisdom Rights and secondary Union of concerned social Xueshengyundong creation voters community monitoring group of Social Democrats Cheung Sha Wan community development force umbrella umbrella Union Alliance
Deal Castle Music Lab Youth Alliance Insurance to defend the freedom of Hong Kong starting frontline frontline technicians chivalrous Southern Democratic Alliance Southern District Southern District things people think west Concern Group made financial sense to build Ideological Jun poison twist Lonely Media Media
Bombard the headquarters HKUST action Hung Hom -Hung Hom things people Mobil home. Hong Kong government priority Hong Kong Summary volunteers his third political and Gonggonghangzheng Society Open University of Hong Kong Open University of the fourth political and public affairs Gonggonghangzheng learn Kai Hong Kong University Students' Union Hong Kong media sunny / sunny news media in Hong Kong Tin Lok DMHK Hong Kong local power of the democratic League Lian Hong Kong civil media broadcast vdo Shau Kee College of creative concern group in Hong Kong to promote the creation of human Simi Simi television Hong Kong community development network television Hong Kong social work students Hong Kong Federation of peanut HKPEANUT.COM Hong Kong Youth Association of Writers Recent decadent food city University of Hong Kong Student Association the 30th Council of computer sciences revolution brain Guinness Hong Kong channel Times honhkongtimes Kong dragon Haiyun surprise team Baptist University of Hong Kong tertiary student Tsing Yi, Hong Kong Federation of students gaming Society Institute of Vocational Education, Hong Kong Institute of Education Hong Kong Polytechnic University students' Union Department of physical therapy-General will be the 23rd Hong Kong film corner Chit king Confessions of A movie Junkie
Hong Kong Internet Society Hong Kong producer network broadcaster IBHK.net Hong Kong otaku rot glue board discussions, Hong Kong lost Qing community in Hong Kong Hong Kong Independent media student media groups fear Southorn attention Scary Bird Bird
Gordon map area pseudo packets youth Ngam Channel
Hong Kong parents loose paper under the umbrella of an abattoir news awakening Hong Kong and China to Hong Kong art teachers Front Videos word progressive alliance progress realignment Action Accountants
Tsz Wan Shan Building strength Neo Democrats bear drawing production actuarial Ideological Times Polymer polyethylene made people rush to grab land LOCAST ROBBER
Plastic umbrella to catch the drop zone motion Civic Passion glue board bandstand farm news Pignewshk Chater Court Scholarism student awakening sip olive nuclear Jazz Jazz & Cat t-Zhong Jinlin Members' offices Sushi Cantonese lyrics Preservation Society Society of Sosad Cantonese Lyrics
Awakening dubbing team of nurses concerned about the political reform group, Wan Chai Wan Chai good amount of log generalized political thoughts flow NTE livelihood Square
I would urge the proper use of this Joint friends page, repeat the signing will not help strengthen the credibility of the signatories, and accordingly rejected.
Please carefully Joint point, speed is not too fast;)
In 2011, the Hong Kong SAR Government tabled the Copyright (Amendment) Bill (commonly known as "Internet Article 23") which endows copyright owners with new "communication rights" and includes the use of copyrighted materials across all electronic communications methods into the regulatory framework of the Copyright Ordinance. Due to netizens' strong objection, "Internet Article 23" did not pass the Legislative Council. in 2013, the HKSAR Government adopted its own "Fair Dealing" proposal in the Bill exempting the use of copyrighted materials for the purposes of parody, satire, pastiche, quotation and reporting & commenting the current event. However, we must stress that "Fair Dealing" is a birdcage that restricts creativity. under "Fair Dealing" exemptions, netizens can only "create" under the framework set out by the HKSAR Government which means their freedom to create is restricted. Should "Internet Article 23" be legislated, all forms of creations not covered by the exemption, including covering pop songs, fan-fiction (doujinshi), video game streaming, rewriting lyrics just for the purposes of expressing feelings, and many others, are not exempted. in short, the exemptions in the Bill are simply restrictions of creation and infringements of freedom of expression with a thin layer of sugar-coating.
Keyboard Frontline and Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance put forward the "User-Generated Content" (UGC) proposal, an alternative open-end exemption, to the HKSAR government during the consultation period. The Bill Committee received over 8,400 responses from the public, and 90% of these responses support UGC. In addition, Professor Peter K. Yu, intellectual property expert and founding director of the Intellectual Property Law Center at Drake University Law School, has repeatedly explained to the HKSAR Government that UGC could fulfill the International Copyright law . Soon after, Progressive Lawyers Group also proposed the inclusion of "Fair Use" doctrine, which had been used in the US for over 30 years. However, the HKSAR Government refused to consider, let along adopt, any of these opinions and proposals.
The exemptions under the "Internet Article 23" provided by the HKSAR Government obviously favour copyright owners. Comparing the exemptions included in the Bill with the UK equivalent, we notice that the HKSAR Government deliberately left a crucial element Contract Override out of the Bill. This means, even if netizens can avoid being prosecuted for copyright infringement under the exemptions of the amended Copyright Ordinance, the copyright owners may still file a civil lawsuit against netizens for breach of contract. This once again shows the exemptions in the Bill are simply insufficient.
In recent years, the HKSAR Government has prosecuted netizens for Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent (ACCDI) (Crimes Ordinance Ch. 200 s.161). Although the HKSAR Government claimed that ACCDI is not applicable to the Copyright Ordinance, the case of netizen "The Big Crook" (real name: Chan Nai-ming *) demonstrated a different story: in 2005, Chan Nai-ming was charged with 3 counts of "attempting to distribute an infringing copy of a copyright work to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright, without the licence of the copyright owner ". The HKSAR Government threw in the criminal charge of" obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent "on behalf of the copyright owners on top of the Copyright Ordinance charges. Chan's case shows that the HKSAR Government has planned it all along to create the double whammy "Internet Article 23" and ACCDI charges to restrain creativity and tighten its grip on netizens.
* Chan is believed to be the first person in the world convicted of the crime of illegal mass distribution of copyrighted works using BitTorrent Peer-to-peer file sharing.
Hence, we demand the HKSAR Government to:
● To specify in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 that "Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent" does not apply to any criminal offences under the Copyright Ordinance;
● To add Contract Override Provision in all exemptions, overriding Terms of Contract in copyright infringement cases which in turn guarantees full civil exemption; and
● To introduce "Open-end Exemptions" (User-Generated Content and Fair Use) in the Bill, so that creation is no longer limited to a number ways which strikes a fine balance between the interests of copyright owners and individuals' freedom of expression and freedom to create.
We also ask all legislators to support the inclusion of Contract Override, UGC and Fair Use in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill. We urge all legislators to vote down "Internet Article 23" if the above amendments do not get accepted, and express their determination to defend the freedom of secondary creation and internet freedom, and fight for Open-end Exemption as explained above.
Petition by Keyboard Frontline, Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance
2015-12-02
Keyboard Frontline and Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance put forward the "User-Generated Content" (UGC) proposal, an alternative open-end exemption, to the HKSAR government during the consultation period. The Bill Committee received over 8,400 responses from the public, and 90% of these responses support UGC. In addition, Professor Peter K. Yu, intellectual property expert and founding director of the Intellectual Property Law Center at Drake University Law School, has repeatedly explained to the HKSAR Government that UGC could fulfill the International Copyright law . Soon after, Progressive Lawyers Group also proposed the inclusion of "Fair Use" doctrine, which had been used in the US for over 30 years. However, the HKSAR Government refused to consider, let along adopt, any of these opinions and proposals.
The exemptions under the "Internet Article 23" provided by the HKSAR Government obviously favour copyright owners. Comparing the exemptions included in the Bill with the UK equivalent, we notice that the HKSAR Government deliberately left a crucial element Contract Override out of the Bill. This means, even if netizens can avoid being prosecuted for copyright infringement under the exemptions of the amended Copyright Ordinance, the copyright owners may still file a civil lawsuit against netizens for breach of contract. This once again shows the exemptions in the Bill are simply insufficient.
In recent years, the HKSAR Government has prosecuted netizens for Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent (ACCDI) (Crimes Ordinance Ch. 200 s.161). Although the HKSAR Government claimed that ACCDI is not applicable to the Copyright Ordinance, the case of netizen "The Big Crook" (real name: Chan Nai-ming *) demonstrated a different story: in 2005, Chan Nai-ming was charged with 3 counts of "attempting to distribute an infringing copy of a copyright work to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright, without the licence of the copyright owner ". The HKSAR Government threw in the criminal charge of" obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent "on behalf of the copyright owners on top of the Copyright Ordinance charges. Chan's case shows that the HKSAR Government has planned it all along to create the double whammy "Internet Article 23" and ACCDI charges to restrain creativity and tighten its grip on netizens.
* Chan is believed to be the first person in the world convicted of the crime of illegal mass distribution of copyrighted works using BitTorrent Peer-to-peer file sharing.
Hence, we demand the HKSAR Government to:
● To specify in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 that "Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent" does not apply to any criminal offences under the Copyright Ordinance;
● To add Contract Override Provision in all exemptions, overriding Terms of Contract in copyright infringement cases which in turn guarantees full civil exemption; and
● To introduce "Open-end Exemptions" (User-Generated Content and Fair Use) in the Bill, so that creation is no longer limited to a number ways which strikes a fine balance between the interests of copyright owners and individuals' freedom of expression and freedom to create.
We also ask all legislators to support the inclusion of Contract Override, UGC and Fair Use in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill. We urge all legislators to vote down "Internet Article 23" if the above amendments do not get accepted, and express their determination to defend the freedom of secondary creation and internet freedom, and fight for Open-end Exemption as explained above.
Petition by Keyboard Frontline, Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance
2015-12-02
I agree to the above content and signatories oppose the "2014 Copyright (Amendment) Bill" I agree with the aforementioned content, and sign the petition *
Agree / agree
Joint nominal *
Individual (Individual)
Group / unit (Group)
Joint persons / group name | Your (organization's) name *
===
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1tZu-Tj7xwkz0AoEX08EaUZH3kHeHu4lwf3JZPFe6Zy0/viewform
反對「網絡23條」 力爭「開放式豁免」2011 年時，政府提出「網絡 23 條」賦予版權持有人「傳播權」，將所有以電子傳播方式使用版權物的行為納入版權法下規管。在網民強烈反對下，「網絡 23 條」最後被拉倒。於2013年，政府採用「公平處理Fair Dealing」豁免特定幾種創作方式下的版權使用，即「戲仿」、「諷刺」、「模仿」、「滑稽」、「引用」及「報導與評論時事」。我們必需指「公平處理 Fair Dealing」是限制創作的鳥籠，網民要創作就只能在政府預設的框架下去進行，不得越過雷池半步。以後，在這些豁免外的創作，包括認真翻唱、漫畫同人誌、串流打機、抒情改詞等，統統都不獲豁免，屬於「網絡 23 條」下的刑事罪行。無疑，所謂的豁免根本是限制創作及表達自由的糖衣毒藥。
鍵盤戰線與版權及二次創作聯盟為此向政府提出第四方案開放式豁免 「用戶衍生 UGC」。諮詢完結時，法案委員會收到超過 8,400 份意見書，當中9成支持「用戶衍生 UGC」。而美國德雷克大學法學院知識產權法專家余家明教授亦曾多次向政府解釋開放式豁免「用戶衍生 UGC」如何符合版權國際法。其後，法政匯思亦提出引入美國沿用了 30 多年的開放式豁免「公平使用 Fair Use」，但統統不為政府接納。
政府於「網絡23條」下給予的所謂民事豁免，顯然是為版權持有人留有一手。在對比英國相同的豁免法例後，我們發現政府刻意遺漏了法例上「版權人不可以合約條款凌駕版權法的豁免」(Contract override) 的條文，意即網民或可得到版權法下的豁免而不被控告侵權，但版權人仍可以違反合約條文為由向網民作民事索償。可見，所謂的民事豁免根本是形同虛設！
近年，政府曾多次以「不誠實使用電腦罪」控告網民。縱然，政府辯稱「不誠實使用電腦罪」不適用於版權法下。但我們就發現2005 年「古惑天皇」一案中，政府曾越俎代庖為版權持有人提出刑事檢控時用上「不誠實使用電腦罪」及版權刑事罪交替控告被告人。由此可見，政府早有預謀將「網絡23條」與「不誠實使用電腦罪」合體，成為限制網絡及創作自由的最強完全體！
在此，我們向政府強烈要求：
1. 於「2014 版權（修訂）條例草案」下清楚列明「不誠實使用電腦罪」不適用於版權法；
2. 於所有豁免下加入「豁免凌駕合約條款」(Contract Override)，令限制版權豁免的合約條款無效，給予真正的民事豁免；及
3. 引入「開放式豁免」（「用戶衍生 UGC」及「公平使用 Fair Use」）令創作不只局限於某幾種手法，既平衡版權人利益又能保障創作及表達自由。
我們亦懇請各議員支持「豁免凌駕合約條款」、「用戶衍生 UGC」及「公平使用 Fair Use」修訂法案。如相關修訂法案未能獲得通過，各議員務必要否決「網絡23條」，向政府表達爭取「開放式豁免」保護二次創作及網絡自由的決心。
鍵盤戰線、版權及二次創作關注聯盟
2015年12月2日
截至 2015-12-03 17:00 HKT 已有超過 180,000 個聯署
截至 2015-12-03 12:30 HKT 已有超過 55,000 個聯署
但因未能及時確定重覆簽署的數字（如有）
所以此臨時數字只供參考
截至 2015-12-03 20:00 HKT
部分聯署單位 （排名依字母、筆劃序，不分左中右）
二次創作權關注組 高登貼圖區 爵爵&貓叔
《頂理》雜誌 「太古人太古事」facebook 地區群組 「沙田人 沙田事」Facebook地區資訊專頁
「柴灣人柴灣事」facebook 地區群組 「筲箕灣人筲箕灣事」facebook 地區群組 DDED
HKG報 香港豬報 Hong Kong Columns (Translated) Kit MAN @ kit da sketch
Kongish Daily《港語日報》 ThisAV.com Um dot dot dot
United Social Press 社會聯合媒體 Yes-news.com 熱新聞 九龍東聯校政改關注組
人民力量 八十後浪 大學知路 University Knowledge
小克 小麗民主教室 中大本土學社
中大社會學系 仁濟醫院林百欣中學國民教育校友關注組 六一七民間約章
反赤化 反殖民 Facebok 群組 屯門社區關注組 屯門青年學院學生會
北區水貨客關注組 北區動源 台灣創意陣線聯盟
台灣漫協公仔社 本土民主前線 民主鍵盤聯盟
民間電台 生於亂世FB page 任啟邦議員辦事處
有傘•友聚Umbrella Unity 米報 伯賴
低俗頻道 沙田社區網絡 沙田新幹綫
良心理政 芒向報 編輯部仝人 放射良心
東九龍社區關注組 法政匯思 法政匯思
版權及二次創作關注聯盟 社工學生運動 社區選民監察組
社會民主連線 長沙灣社區發展力量 雨傘聯盟 Umbrella Union
青山音樂實驗室 青年新政 保衛香港自由聯盟
保險起動 前線科技人員 勇武前線
南方民主同盟 南區人 南區事 城西關注組
思言財雋 思政築覺 毒撚媒體 Lonely Media
炮打司令部 科大行動 紅磡人 紅磡事
美孚家.政 香港人優先 香港小結他義工隊
香港公開大學第三屆政治及公共行政學會 香港公開大學第四屆政治及公共行政學會 啟政 香港公開大學學生會
香港天晴媒體/天晴新聞 香港天樂媒體DMHK 香港本土力量
香港民主聨盟 香港民間媒體廣播vdo 香港兆基創意書院人類創作促進關注小組
香港西米電視 香港西米電視 香港社區發展網絡
香港社會工作學生聯會 香港花生 HKPEANUT.COM 香港近況文學家協會
香港青年頹食協會 香港城市大學學生會第 30屆 電腦科學學科聯會 腦力士 香港革命頻道
香港時報 honhkongtimes 香港海雲驚龍車隊 香港浸會大學學生會
香港專上學生聯會 香港專業教育學院 青衣分校 電競學會 香港教育學院學生會
香港理工大學物理治療系會第23屆幹事會 香港街角 香港電影吹水王 Confessions of A Movie Junkie
香港網上製作人協會 香港網絡廣播電台 IBHK.net 香港腐宅族
香港膠登討論區 香港賠清社 香港學生媒體
香港獨立媒體 修頓關注組 恐懼鳥Scary Bird
高登貼圖區 偽文青年 啱Channel
屠場新聞 傘下爸媽 散紙
港人覺醒 港民領域 港地陣線
畫字 進步教師同盟 進步會師 Action Accountants
慈雲山建設力量 新民主同盟 熊圖製作
精算思政 聚言時報Polymer 趕人搶地LOCAST ROBBER
趕膠所 撐傘落區運動 熱血公民
膠登音樂台 豬場新聞 Pignewshk 遮打豪庭
學民思潮 學生覺醒 橄欖啜核
爵爵&貓叔 鍾錦麟議員辦事處 蘇軾粵語填詞同好會 Society of Sosad Cantonese Lyrics
覺醒配音組 護士政改關注組 灣仔好日誌
灣仔廣義 量心思政 新界東民生流動廣場
敬請各位朋友妥善運用此聯署網頁，重覆簽署無助於加強聯署公信力，並會相應剔除。
請認真一點聯署，速度不要太快 ;)
鍵盤戰線與版權及二次創作聯盟為此向政府提出第四方案開放式豁免 「用戶衍生 UGC」。諮詢完結時，法案委員會收到超過 8,400 份意見書，當中9成支持「用戶衍生 UGC」。而美國德雷克大學法學院知識產權法專家余家明教授亦曾多次向政府解釋開放式豁免「用戶衍生 UGC」如何符合版權國際法。其後，法政匯思亦提出引入美國沿用了 30 多年的開放式豁免「公平使用 Fair Use」，但統統不為政府接納。
政府於「網絡23條」下給予的所謂民事豁免，顯然是為版權持有人留有一手。在對比英國相同的豁免法例後，我們發現政府刻意遺漏了法例上「版權人不可以合約條款凌駕版權法的豁免」(Contract override) 的條文，意即網民或可得到版權法下的豁免而不被控告侵權，但版權人仍可以違反合約條文為由向網民作民事索償。可見，所謂的民事豁免根本是形同虛設！
近年，政府曾多次以「不誠實使用電腦罪」控告網民。縱然，政府辯稱「不誠實使用電腦罪」不適用於版權法下。但我們就發現2005 年「古惑天皇」一案中，政府曾越俎代庖為版權持有人提出刑事檢控時用上「不誠實使用電腦罪」及版權刑事罪交替控告被告人。由此可見，政府早有預謀將「網絡23條」與「不誠實使用電腦罪」合體，成為限制網絡及創作自由的最強完全體！
在此，我們向政府強烈要求：
1. 於「2014 版權（修訂）條例草案」下清楚列明「不誠實使用電腦罪」不適用於版權法；
2. 於所有豁免下加入「豁免凌駕合約條款」(Contract Override)，令限制版權豁免的合約條款無效，給予真正的民事豁免；及
3. 引入「開放式豁免」（「用戶衍生 UGC」及「公平使用 Fair Use」）令創作不只局限於某幾種手法，既平衡版權人利益又能保障創作及表達自由。
我們亦懇請各議員支持「豁免凌駕合約條款」、「用戶衍生 UGC」及「公平使用 Fair Use」修訂法案。如相關修訂法案未能獲得通過，各議員務必要否決「網絡23條」，向政府表達爭取「開放式豁免」保護二次創作及網絡自由的決心。
鍵盤戰線、版權及二次創作關注聯盟
2015年12月2日
截至 2015-12-03 17:00 HKT 已有超過 180,000 個聯署
截至 2015-12-03 12:30 HKT 已有超過 55,000 個聯署
但因未能及時確定重覆簽署的數字（如有）
所以此臨時數字只供參考
截至 2015-12-03 20:00 HKT
部分聯署單位 （排名依字母、筆劃序，不分左中右）
二次創作權關注組 高登貼圖區 爵爵&貓叔
《頂理》雜誌 「太古人太古事」facebook 地區群組 「沙田人 沙田事」Facebook地區資訊專頁
「柴灣人柴灣事」facebook 地區群組 「筲箕灣人筲箕灣事」facebook 地區群組 DDED
HKG報 香港豬報 Hong Kong Columns (Translated) Kit MAN @ kit da sketch
Kongish Daily《港語日報》 ThisAV.com Um dot dot dot
United Social Press 社會聯合媒體 Yes-news.com 熱新聞 九龍東聯校政改關注組
人民力量 八十後浪 大學知路 University Knowledge
小克 小麗民主教室 中大本土學社
中大社會學系 仁濟醫院林百欣中學國民教育校友關注組 六一七民間約章
反赤化 反殖民 Facebok 群組 屯門社區關注組 屯門青年學院學生會
北區水貨客關注組 北區動源 台灣創意陣線聯盟
台灣漫協公仔社 本土民主前線 民主鍵盤聯盟
民間電台 生於亂世FB page 任啟邦議員辦事處
有傘•友聚Umbrella Unity 米報 伯賴
低俗頻道 沙田社區網絡 沙田新幹綫
良心理政 芒向報 編輯部仝人 放射良心
東九龍社區關注組 法政匯思 法政匯思
版權及二次創作關注聯盟 社工學生運動 社區選民監察組
社會民主連線 長沙灣社區發展力量 雨傘聯盟 Umbrella Union
青山音樂實驗室 青年新政 保衛香港自由聯盟
保險起動 前線科技人員 勇武前線
南方民主同盟 南區人 南區事 城西關注組
思言財雋 思政築覺 毒撚媒體 Lonely Media
炮打司令部 科大行動 紅磡人 紅磡事
美孚家.政 香港人優先 香港小結他義工隊
香港公開大學第三屆政治及公共行政學會 香港公開大學第四屆政治及公共行政學會 啟政 香港公開大學學生會
香港天晴媒體/天晴新聞 香港天樂媒體DMHK 香港本土力量
香港民主聨盟 香港民間媒體廣播vdo 香港兆基創意書院人類創作促進關注小組
香港西米電視 香港西米電視 香港社區發展網絡
香港社會工作學生聯會 香港花生 HKPEANUT.COM 香港近況文學家協會
香港青年頹食協會 香港城市大學學生會第 30屆 電腦科學學科聯會 腦力士 香港革命頻道
香港時報 honhkongtimes 香港海雲驚龍車隊 香港浸會大學學生會
香港專上學生聯會 香港專業教育學院 青衣分校 電競學會 香港教育學院學生會
香港理工大學物理治療系會第23屆幹事會 香港街角 香港電影吹水王 Confessions of A Movie Junkie
香港網上製作人協會 香港網絡廣播電台 IBHK.net 香港腐宅族
香港膠登討論區 香港賠清社 香港學生媒體
香港獨立媒體 修頓關注組 恐懼鳥Scary Bird
高登貼圖區 偽文青年 啱Channel
屠場新聞 傘下爸媽 散紙
港人覺醒 港民領域 港地陣線
畫字 進步教師同盟 進步會師 Action Accountants
慈雲山建設力量 新民主同盟 熊圖製作
精算思政 聚言時報Polymer 趕人搶地LOCAST ROBBER
趕膠所 撐傘落區運動 熱血公民
膠登音樂台 豬場新聞 Pignewshk 遮打豪庭
學民思潮 學生覺醒 橄欖啜核
爵爵&貓叔 鍾錦麟議員辦事處 蘇軾粵語填詞同好會 Society of Sosad Cantonese Lyrics
覺醒配音組 護士政改關注組 灣仔好日誌
灣仔廣義 量心思政 新界東民生流動廣場
敬請各位朋友妥善運用此聯署網頁，重覆簽署無助於加強聯署公信力，並會相應剔除。
請認真一點聯署，速度不要太快 ;)
In 2011, the Hong Kong SAR Government tabled the Copyright (Amendment) Bill (commonly known as “Internet Article 23”) which endows copyright owners with new “communication rights” and includes the use of copyrighted materials across all electronic communications methods into the regulatory framework of the Copyright Ordinance. Due to netizens’ strong objection, “Internet Article 23” did not pass the Legislative Council. In 2013, the HKSAR Government adopted its own “Fair Dealing” proposal in the Bill exempting the use of copyrighted materials for the purposes of parody, satire, pastiche, quotation and reporting & commenting the current event. However, we must stress that “Fair Dealing” is a birdcage that restricts creativity. Under “Fair Dealing” exemptions, netizens can only “create” under the framework set out by the HKSAR Government which means their freedom to create is restricted. Should “Internet Article 23” be legislated, all forms of creations not covered by the exemption, including covering pop songs, fan-fiction (doujinshi), video game streaming, rewriting lyrics just for the purposes of expressing feelings, and many others, are not exempted. In short, the exemptions in the Bill are simply restrictions of creation and infringements of freedom of expression with a thin layer of sugar-coating.Keyboard Frontline and Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance put forward the “User-Generated Content” (UGC) proposal, an alternative open-end exemption, to the HKSAR government during the consultation period. The Bill Committee received over 8,400 responses from the public, and 90% of these responses support UGC. In addition, Professor Peter K. Yu, intellectual property expert and founding director of the Intellectual Property Law Center at Drake University Law School, has repeatedly explained to the HKSAR Government that UGC could fulfill the International Copyright law. Soon after, Progressive Lawyers Group also proposed the inclusion of “Fair Use” doctrine, which had been used in the US for over 30 years. However, the HKSAR Government refused to consider, let along adopt, any of these opinions and proposals.
The exemptions under the “Internet Article 23” provided by the HKSAR Government obviously favour copyright owners. Comparing the exemptions included in the Bill with the UK equivalent, we notice that the HKSAR Government deliberately left a crucial element Contract Override out of the Bill. This means, even if netizens can avoid being prosecuted for copyright infringement under the exemptions of the amended Copyright Ordinance, the copyright owners may still file a civil lawsuit against netizens for breach of contract. This once again shows the exemptions in the Bill are simply insufficient.
In recent years, the HKSAR Government has prosecuted netizens for Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent (ACCDI) (Crimes Ordinance Ch. 200 s.161). Although the HKSAR Government claimed that ACCDI is not applicable to the Copyright Ordinance, the case of netizen “The Big Crook” (real name: Chan Nai-ming*) demonstrated a different story: in 2005, Chan Nai-ming was charged with 3 counts of “attempting to distribute an infringing copy of a copyright work to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright, without the licence of the copyright owner”. The HKSAR Government threw in the criminal charge of “obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent” on behalf of the copyright owners on top of the Copyright Ordinance charges. Chan’s case shows that the HKSAR Government has planned it all along to create the double whammy “Internet Article 23” and ACCDI charges to restrain creativity and tighten its grip on netizens.
*Chan is believed to be the first person in the world convicted of the crime of illegal mass distribution of copyrighted works using BitTorrent Peer-to-peer file sharing.
Hence, we demand the HKSAR Government to:
● To specify in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 that “Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent” does not apply to any criminal offences under the Copyright Ordinance;
● To add Contract Override Provision in all exemptions, overriding Terms of Contract in copyright infringement cases which in turn guarantees full civil exemption; and
● To introduce “Open-end Exemptions” (User-Generated Content and Fair Use) in the Bill, so that creation is no longer limited to a number ways which strikes a fine balance between the interests of copyright owners and individuals’ freedom of expression and freedom to create.
We also ask all legislators to support the inclusion of Contract Override, UGC and Fair Use in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill. We urge all legislators to vote down “Internet Article 23” if the above amendments do not get accepted, and express their determination to defend the freedom of secondary creation and internet freedom, and fight for Open-end Exemption as explained above.
Petition by Keyboard Frontline, Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance
2015-12-02
The exemptions under the “Internet Article 23” provided by the HKSAR Government obviously favour copyright owners. Comparing the exemptions included in the Bill with the UK equivalent, we notice that the HKSAR Government deliberately left a crucial element Contract Override out of the Bill. This means, even if netizens can avoid being prosecuted for copyright infringement under the exemptions of the amended Copyright Ordinance, the copyright owners may still file a civil lawsuit against netizens for breach of contract. This once again shows the exemptions in the Bill are simply insufficient.
In recent years, the HKSAR Government has prosecuted netizens for Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent (ACCDI) (Crimes Ordinance Ch. 200 s.161). Although the HKSAR Government claimed that ACCDI is not applicable to the Copyright Ordinance, the case of netizen “The Big Crook” (real name: Chan Nai-ming*) demonstrated a different story: in 2005, Chan Nai-ming was charged with 3 counts of “attempting to distribute an infringing copy of a copyright work to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright, without the licence of the copyright owner”. The HKSAR Government threw in the criminal charge of “obtaining access to a computer with dishonest intent” on behalf of the copyright owners on top of the Copyright Ordinance charges. Chan’s case shows that the HKSAR Government has planned it all along to create the double whammy “Internet Article 23” and ACCDI charges to restrain creativity and tighten its grip on netizens.
*Chan is believed to be the first person in the world convicted of the crime of illegal mass distribution of copyrighted works using BitTorrent Peer-to-peer file sharing.
Hence, we demand the HKSAR Government to:
● To specify in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 that “Access to Computer with Criminal or Dishonest Intent” does not apply to any criminal offences under the Copyright Ordinance;
● To add Contract Override Provision in all exemptions, overriding Terms of Contract in copyright infringement cases which in turn guarantees full civil exemption; and
● To introduce “Open-end Exemptions” (User-Generated Content and Fair Use) in the Bill, so that creation is no longer limited to a number ways which strikes a fine balance between the interests of copyright owners and individuals’ freedom of expression and freedom to create.
We also ask all legislators to support the inclusion of Contract Override, UGC and Fair Use in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill. We urge all legislators to vote down “Internet Article 23” if the above amendments do not get accepted, and express their determination to defend the freedom of secondary creation and internet freedom, and fight for Open-end Exemption as explained above.
Petition by Keyboard Frontline, Copyrights & Derivative Works Alliance
2015-12-02
我同意上述聯署內容並反對通過 《2014年版權(修訂)草案》I agree with the aforementioned content, and sign the petition *
聯署名義 *
聯署者/團體名稱 | Your (organization's) name *
===
http://www.voacantonese.com/a/yf-bj-wukan-update-4-analysis/3386916.html
Follow Wukan (4) On the role of the media in the media people of Wukan
Last Update 22.06.2016.
Shanwei, Guangdong Wukan Village Tsu Love arrested after being read on television confession draft, local outrage, protest it, "was guilty." Wednesday morning, the human rights lawyer Ge Yongxi tweet disclosure, Tsu love family hired him as defense counsel, but the judiciary to stop immediately. The day before, more than a dozen foreign network transmission media to Wukan alleged illegal interview. Local authorities accused the foreign media of Apple Daily and other individual in Wukan village planning director inciting villagers to protest actions and warning measures will be taken according to the law. Apple Daily editor has denied the allegations, saying that "should not discredit the media to divert attention." Hong Kong Reporters Association issued a statement to protest Shanwei authorities trumped-up charges against the Hong Kong media, emphasizing the reporter went to interview it is the proper meaning. Voice of America on issues related to senior media person in Hong Kong Zhou Bing made a telephone interview.
Reporter: Wukan things you care about it?
Zhou Bing: I am looking at.
Reporter: Some media said today, in particular, the Hong Kong media in inciting, directing, planning, how do you think?
Zhou Bing: the general will not go to Hong Kong media incitement, it is possible and they (the villagers Wukan) contacting this interview. Because the Hong Kong media, especially in the general media, like TVB, more neutral, nothing incitement.
Reporter: Are you saying the press office of Shanwei how to see?
Zhou Bing: I see. Hong Kong is not only the media, and all media Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, NHK, CNN, etc. are said to be illegal interview. Hong Kong media have specifically mentioned the situation of incitement.
Reporter: It's in line with facts? Or is there any truth?
Zhou Bing: It should not. This is consistent routine, Xinwenjizhe generally not to stir, there is no way incite. Xinwenjizhe limited understanding of the situation, this is the first. Second, Hong Kong reporter for many domestic practice is not particularly clear. In this case the most is the interview, or how to expand the influence of some claims in the media dissemination. But they say incitement to do something, they do it is a peaceful march ah!
Reporter: But officials want to blame the media.
Zhou Bing: all this, the official one to this case, that is, outside forces to incite the back support and so on. Basically, every thing is doing. For example, in Hong Kong students to account, but also the foreign forces. China any thing, as long as there have been, even if it does not appear, also said that foreign forces, because it is better to speak logically. Whenever something happen, to the terms of a foreign power against the Scarecrow would stand on end, all actions have a legitimate basis.
Reporter: Now you see so that the media will take what action?
Zhou Bing: Who can apply for approval of an interview it? Overseas reporters generally get approval, so today's announcement is the global media. I have talked about, news agencies, including AP, AFP, Reuters, CNN, NHK both named to the point. Not only is Hong Kong media, said the Hong Kong media, or incidentally. Mainly foreign media. Hong Kong media impact is limited, the other party or government department in charge of most afraid of is global. Last Wukan is carried out in a global concern, the official great pressure, and finally reached a relatively modest compromise. Today Wukan people most hurt is on TV, Tsu love to say he lacks legal knowledge, kickbacks in livelihood projects, huge rebates, television public display problems.
Reporter: how do you see this problem?
Zhou Bing: stigma thing, especially television public display. Like Yang Lei last event, the police came out and said, foot woman said, then basically is a stigma to throw over. By law, any person not previously been the end of the trial court, is a suspect only. The suspect should not be said on television own confession. After you have finished you tried to go through legal guilt guilty, not guilty to guilty. Of course, how the trial court, in this case China, we also difficult to know. But before trial, no matter how much you sin, you're basically just a suspect, not a criminal. Now the guilty people on TV shows after all, he said he admitted that he is corrupt and himself speak, that basically this is a breach of legal proceedings.
Reporter: So reporters, whether it is Hong Kong media or just the international media, or, in his interview that place, encountered this kind of thing. According to you now see these reports, you think they have in there to incite, or where it is suspected booing?
Zhou Bing: they even incite these Wukan who can not make the event any excessive ah. Wukan people from the last (2011) Wukan Until now, Wukan people who never thought of going to overthrow the government or overthrow anyone.
They basically request is "Give me my land" only. "Give me my land" and is to corrupt officials inside the village tidy, so basically, the goal is a very simple Yin governance issues, and not a political issue society. Although that time the village committee election is a considerable index meaning, to a certain extent, but that is just the village. The village is an administrative authority, and power, ideology basically no matter relations. Thus, things like this, you say reporters to stir, he can do anything? So, the reporter said to be spread internationally, (just say) should Know it, because they (the villagers Wukan) goal is not a political aspirations, their goals are basically interest demands. So in this case, you said he (reporter) can incite? And Wukan people, of course, the last time there is a conflict and the police, that is another matter, but so far, you see their organization's actions or play (move) the flag ah, ah sang revolutionary songs, I also requested secretary ah, I also claim the land, that is, those ah.
Reporter: even shouted "Long live the Communist Party" mean.
Zhou Bing: ah, he basically singing the Internationale, shouting "Long live the Communist Party", I also secretary of the Communist Party, are like this. Because, like sport at the grassroots level, they have no political inclination, he basically is a kind of (demand) the interests of the population movement, so you say you again incitement, there is no danger to subvert the regime.
Reporter: Yes, that Wukan people do things they still have more sense of proportion is it?
Zhou Bing: they because the last (2011 Wukan) experienced a thing. Their goal is simple, local, grass-roots officials of the goal. And their main interest is "Give me my land" only.
Reporter: But now there's the police, ah, ah police also were there, that the atmosphere is quite tense.
Zhou Bing: Yes, (the police, the police) very much, it seems. Wukan thing because it is not like anything else, such as the demolition ah, some other group of grass-roots movement. Wukan thing because the last time received international attention, this time is so much international media to go, but as an indicator of China Wukan grassroots democratic elections. Wukan we have seen something of it, feel Wukan on other things, such grassroots elections have some impact, grassroots management committee or villagers (with some influence). This is the village management committee, the grass-roots at this level this is not the main hall. This layer of people involved in the reform or institutional ah, there is a considerable role of indicators, so all the media went. Defangzhengfu this, I do not know why this would be a Defangzhengfu like this weird, because the last time, has been resolved, said the land should be returned to the villagers, or is this interest could be assigned to the hands of the villagers. Why this time, the past few years, (this issue) has not dealt with, this is the first. Second, the villagers to meetings, secretary to the people again arrested.
Reporter: Yes. So now Tsu love thing, it is now in a stage of the investigation stage or is suspected, there is no decision yet, right?
Zhou Bing: a few questions my main concern. First, people in Wukan villagers' autonomy in this activity is indeed played a role, but also to the whole world to see China at the grassroots level can also be a number reform of management, (played) the role of indicators. This is the last thing originally Difangzhengfu has been processed, the Guangdong provincial government have finished processing. But so many years past, they (the villagers Wukan) substantially demands were not met, they are ready to once again petition. Their petition is actually after the last fight, they organized to good. The first is do not let other people participate in the village, and the second is to have a picket of his own, and the third are all "Long live the Communist Party" like this slogan. The basic appeal is to ask, "Give me back my land" only, then in this case, the government would have been a solution to the conflict are gentle, but also as a good example in the world for everyone to see. That is, the government has to respond to the demands of the people, and this is the gentle way to solve, but the basic promise reasonable demands of the people. But so many years past, these requirements are not only no, but now people again to appeal the case, they take a lot of extreme actions, such as grasping the secretary ah, ah soldiers arrives, armed police appeared ah like. So like this provoked a major international event, I do not know how to think Difangzhengfu.
Reporter: One last question is about the love Tsu arrest the problem and a crime to his safety, and his video confession today this thing, you can talk again, that's why he did it?
Zhou Bing: This is illegal. Because Tsu Fall in love once, because he is a retired officer, and he experienced in the past to work in the comparative public institutions. So I watched the documentary because Wukan things, Sun TV is watched them beat the whole documentary is a long documentary. In this he was the village Wukan has played a very important role. He, first, logical thinking more clearly. Second, words are more rational. Third, he has some provocative. Well, he is the central figure in the village, the last movement to have the final outcome of the case, and he has a significant relationship. Because he advocated "non-violent" and "rational fight."
So in the past five years, Wukan because Wukan we have a very clear, that is, the subsequent conduct. For example, the construction of people's livelihood, because he is the livelihood of the people involved in the construction project, which has a rebate. Wukan land because basically in the hands of the rich people, or is already sold out. So Wukan resources are limited, so Wukan can be any large-scale project, then the possibility is that there is a possibility of capital investment, but there will be a lot of money in this place, the villagers could not have been otherwise not satisfied. So therefore in this case I very much doubt that he ah bribery, corruption, ah, how much money can be used for his bribery corruption? This is the first. Second, even suspected him of taking bribes corruption trial before the court did not, he was just a (is) suspected person, a suspect only. Then the suspect should not be at this time, the public security department and let people confess on television. This is a violation of the law, because the results of innocence inference, that is only to say you are guilty or not guilty to the court after sentence completion. Well, this is a bad practice, this demonstrates the management of the country, the rule of law, fully or in a primitive state, but also basically their own interests to a variety of operational guidance. I think this is for the international community create a very bad impression. You also stressed that the rule of law on the one hand, on the other hand demonstrates the variety does not comply with the rule of law practice.
===
http://www.voacantonese.com/a/yf-bj-wukan-update-4-analysis/3386916.html
關注烏坎(4) 傳媒人談傳媒在烏坎事件的作用
Last Update 22.06.2016.
Follow Wukan (4) On the role of the media in the media people of Wukan (1:08)
廣東汕尾烏坎村官林祖戀被拘捕後在電視上念稿招供，當地群情激憤，抗議其“被認罪”。星期三上午，維權律師葛永喜發推文披露，林祖戀家人聘請他作辯 護律師，但立即被司法部門制止。一天前，網傳十多家境外傳媒被指到烏坎村非法採訪。地方當局指責蘋果日報等個別境外傳媒在烏坎村內煽動策劃導演村民抗爭行 動，並警告將依法採取措施。蘋果日報主編對上述指控予以否認，說“不應以抹黑傳媒來轉移視線。”香港記者協會發表聲明，抗議汕尾當局以莫須有罪名指控香港 傳媒，強調記者前往採訪實屬應有之義。美國之音就相關問題對在香港的資深傳媒人周兵作了電話專訪。
記者：烏坎的事情您關注了嗎？
周兵：我在看。
記者：今天說一些傳媒，特別是香港傳媒，在煽動、導演、策劃，您怎麼看？
周兵：香港傳媒一般不會去煽動的 ，有可能和他們(烏坎村民)採訪接觸這樣。因為香港傳媒，尤其是一般傳媒，像TVB，比較中立，沒有甚麼好煽動的。
記者：您對汕尾的新聞辦的說法怎麼看？
周兵：我看到了。不光是對香港傳媒，還有美聯社、法新社、 NHK、 CNN等所有傳媒都說是違規採訪。特別提到香港媒体有這個煽動的情況。
記者：這種說法符合事實嗎？或者是有甚麼道理嗎？
周兵：應該不。這都是一貫套路，新聞記者一般不會去煽動，也沒有辦法煽動。新聞記者了解的情況有限，這是第一。第二，香港記者對國內很多做法也不是 特別清楚。這種情況下最多是採訪，或者是在媒體傳播上如何擴大影響有些說法。但是說煽動他們做些事情，他們做的事情也是和平遊行而已啊！
記者：但是官方想把責任推給媒體。
周兵：都是這樣的，官方一到這種情況，就是境外勢力在後面煽動支持等等。基本上每個事情都是這樣做的。比如香港學生去佔中，也是境外勢力。中國任何 一個事情，只要出現了，哪怕沒有出現，也說境外勢力，因為這樣邏輯比較好講。但凡遇到甚麼事情，往境外勢力方面一靠，稻草人就豎起來了，所有行動都有合法 的依據了。
記者：接下來你看這樣一說，會對媒體採取甚麼行動？
周兵：誰能夠申請得到批准採訪呢？境外記者一般得不到申請批准的，所以今天的公告是對全球媒體的。我剛才講了，通訊社，包括美聯社、法新社、路透 社、CNN、NHK都點名點到了。不光是香港媒體，香港媒體還是捎帶說的。主要是境外媒體。畢竟香港媒體影響有限，對方政府或主管部門最害怕的就是全球 性。上次烏坎事件就是在全球關注下進行的，官方很大壓力，最後達成了一個相對溫和的妥協。今天對烏坎人最有傷害的是電視上，林祖戀說了他法律知識不足， 在民生項目中拿回扣，回扣巨大，電視示眾的問題出現。
記者：這個問題你怎麼看？
周兵：污名化的事情，尤其電視示眾。就像上次雷陽事件，警察出來一說，足浴女一說，然後基本上就是一個污名就拋過去了。按照法律規定來說，任何人在 沒有被法院審判結束以前，都是一個嫌犯而已。這個嫌犯不應該說是自己在電視上招供的。你要經過法律審判完了之後你有罪就有罪，無罪就無罪的。當然，法庭怎 麼審判，在中國這個情況下，咱們也很難知道。但是在審判以前，不管你多大的罪過，你基本上是一個嫌疑人而已，而不是一個罪犯 。犯現在把人家放在電視上示眾之後，就說他都承認了，他貪污受賄，自己都講了，那基本上這個做法是違反法律程序的。
記者：那麼記者，不管是港媒也好，還是國際媒體也好，他在那地方採訪，遇到這種事情。根據你到目前為止所看到的這些報道，你覺得他們有在那兒煽動，或者是在那兒起哄之嫌嗎？
周兵：他們即使是煽動，這些烏坎的人也做不出甚麼過份的事件啊。烏坎的人從上一次(2011年)烏坎事件到現在為止，烏坎的人從來也沒有想到要去推 翻政府，或者打倒誰。他們基本上的要求就是“還我土地”而已。“還我土地”，然後就是把村里面的貪官們收拾一下，基本上就是這樣的，目的都是一個很簡單的 賢政問題，而並不是一個社會的政治問題。雖然那一次村委會的選舉是有相當大的指標意義的，有一定的影響，但是也就是村委會而已。這個是一個村子的管理權， 和政權、意識形態基本上都是沒有關係的事情。因此，像這樣的事情，你說記者去煽動，他能做到甚麼事情？所以說，記者說是在國際上傳播，(也只是說)應該怎 麼樣做而已，因為他們(烏坎村民)的目標並不是一個政治訴求，他們的目標基本上是利益訴求。所以在這種情況下，你說他(記者)能煽動？而且烏坎的人，當然 上次和警察有衝突的時候，那也是另外一回事，但是到目前為止，你看他們組織的行動都還是打(舉)著國旗啊，唱著革命歌曲啊，要求還我支書啊，要求還我土 地，也就是這些啊。
記者：甚至還喊著“共產黨萬歲”呢。
周兵：對啊，他基本上就是唱著國際歌，喊著“共產黨萬歲”，還我共產黨書記，都是這樣子的。因為像在基層的運動，他們沒有政治傾向性，他基本上都是一種(訴求)利益的群體運動，所以你說你再煽動，也沒有顛覆政權的危險。
記者：是，就是說烏坎人他們做事情還是比較有分寸的是嗎？
周兵：他們因為上次(2011年烏坎事件)有經驗了嘛。他們的目標都是簡單的、地方性的、基層官員的目標。而且他們主要的利益就是“還我土地”而已。
記者：那可是現在那邊的警察啊、警車啊還都在那兒，那氣氛也是蠻緊張的。
周兵：是，(警察、警車)非常之多，看起來。因為烏坎的事情它不像別的，比如說拆遷啊，別的一些的基層的群體運動。烏坎的事情因為上一次受到了國際 關注，這一次又是這麼多國際媒體去了，而且烏坎是作為中國基層民主選舉的一個指標。大家都看到烏坎的事情呢，都覺得烏坎的事情會對其他的，比如說基層的選 舉有一些影響，或者基層的村民管理委員會(有一些影響)。這還是村民管理委員會，基層這一級這還不是正廳。對這一層體制上的改革或者民眾的參與啊，有相當 大的指標作用，因此全體媒體都去了。這個地方政府，我就不知道這個地方政府為甚麼會出這樣子的怪招，因為上一次，已經解決了，說土地應該還給村民們，或者 是把這個利益能分到村民手上。為甚麼這一次，這幾年過去，(這個問題)也沒有處理，這是第一。第二，村民要集會，又把人家支書給抓了。
記者：是。那麼現在林祖戀的事情，現在還是處於一種偵查階段或者是嫌疑階段，還根本沒有定案，對不對？
周兵：我主要關注的幾個問題，第一，是烏坎人在這個村民自治的活動中，確實是起到了一定作用，而且給全世界的人看到，中國在基層上也可以進行一些管 理上的改革，(起到了)這個指標作用。這個事情本來地方政府上次是已經處理了，廣東省政府都已經處理完了。可是這麼幾年過去，他們(烏坎村民)基本上的訴 求沒有得到滿足，他們准備再一次請願。他們的請願活動其實是經過上一次的鬥爭之後，他們組織地挺好的。第一是別讓別的村的人參加，第二是他自己有一個糾察 隊，第三全都是“共產黨萬歲”這樣子的口號。基本訴求就是要求“還我土地”而已，那麼在這種情況下，本來政府上一次已經把矛盾都溫和地解決，而且作為一個 很好的典範，在全世界給大家看到。就是說，民眾的訴求政府有回應，而且是以溫和的方式解決的，而且答應了民眾的基本合理要求。但是這麼幾年過去，這些要求 不僅沒有答應，而且現在人家要再提出上訴的話，又採取很多極端的行動，比如說抓這個書記啊，大兵壓境啊，警察武警出現啊等等。那麼這樣子又挑起一個大的國 際事件，我就不知道地方政府是怎麼想的。
記者：最後一個問題，就是關於林祖戀的抓捕的問題，和給他安的一個罪名，以及他今天視頻認罪這個事情，您再能談一談，就是他為甚麼這樣做？
周兵：這都是違法的。因為林祖戀上一次，因為他是一個退休人員，而且他有過去在比較大眾機構工作的經驗。所以我因為烏坎的事情看了紀錄片，就是看了 陽光衛視他們拍的全程紀錄片，就是很長的紀錄片。他在這個烏坎村的這個村里起到了很重要的作用。他又，第一，邏輯思路比較清楚。第二，言辭也比較有理。第 三，他有一定的煽動性。那麼，他是這個村子里的核心人物，上次的運動最後能有那個結局的話，和他有相當大的關係。因為他主張“非暴力”，然後是“理性爭 取”。
那麼在過去的這五年間，烏坎的，因為烏坎的有一個情況我們不太清楚，就是後續的進行。比如說民生的建設，因為他牽涉到的是民生建設里的工程，里面有 回扣。因為烏坎的土地基本上還是在人家富人的手上，或者是已經賣出去了。那麼烏坎的資源是有限的，所以在烏坎能夠進行甚麼大型的工程的話，可能性，就是資 金投入的可能性是有，但不會有大量的資金在這個地方，否則村民也不會這樣不滿意了。那麼因此在這種情況下我就非常懷疑，他受賄啊、貪污啊，有多少錢可以供 他受賄貪污的？這是第一。第二，即便懷疑他受賄貪污，在法庭沒有審判之前，他只是一個(被)懷疑人、一個嫌疑人而已。那麼嫌疑人不應該在這個時候，由公安 部門讓人家在電視上認罪的。這是違反法律的，因為無罪推論的結果，就是要法庭判完之後才說你有罪或者是沒罪。那麼這個是一個不好的做法，這個彰顯了這個國 家的管理，在法治上，完全還是在一種原始狀態，而且還基本上是以自己的利益來進行各種各樣的行動指導。我覺得這是給國際上造成一種很壞的印象。你在一方面 又強調法治，另一方面又彰顯了各種不符合法治的做法。
===
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/1741267
[Breaking News / General] reported yesterday in the British withdraw from the EU through a referendum to become the focus of global attention. In addition to stock market and currency by the immediate impact, the British foreign and internal affairs will also face a series of challenges. London was the capital of a petition on the motion, so that the requirements of independence and joined the European Union in London.
-
Let people petition independent London to join the EU, and the elected mayor of London Sodick Khan became president. (Bloomberg).
According to "BBC" reported in London in the referendum and 60% of public support to stay in Europe, but when it did, the people would have launched a petition campaign for the independence and allow to join the EU and the Schengen area of London. Sponsor O'Malley (James O'Malley) said, "London is a world-class city, we should be the heart of Europe."
Petitioner also mentioned that if the success of the London Independent, recently appointed Mayor of London Sodick Khan (Sadiq Khan) directly become "president of London", the case for nearly 10 million people countersigned.
Europe off the face of the results, Sodick Khan said, "We will continue to work with countries around the world, including the EU, the development of full diplomatic relations and trade."
===
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/1741267
〔即時新聞／綜合報導〕英國在昨日透過公投決定退出歐盟，成為全球關注的焦點。除了股市與貨幣受到立即的影響外，英國的外交與內政也將面臨一連串考驗。首都倫敦就有人發起請願運動，要求讓倫敦獨立並加入歐盟。
根據《BBC》報導，倫敦在這次公投中有6成民眾支持留歐，但事與願違的情況下，有民眾便發起請願運動，要求讓倫敦獨立並加入歐盟和申根區。發起人奧馬利（James O'Malley）表示，「倫敦是世界級的城市，我們應該成為歐洲的心臟。」
請願中還提到，若倫敦獨立成功，不久前上任的倫敦市長沙迪克汗（Sadiq Khan）可直接成為「倫敦總統」，該案已有將近10萬人連署。
面對脫歐的結果，沙迪克汗表示，「我們將持續與世界各國，包括歐盟，發展全面的外交關係與貿易活動。」
===
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/1743649
[Breaking News / Roundup] China Xiantao City, Hubei Province intends to build waste incineration power plant, causing local people very dissatisfied, even at the streets to protest, but the local police was violent repression, local people accused of violent attacks armed citizens, nor even pregnant women let go, let the people sigh, society is so dark.
Integrated media reported that China Xiantao City, Hubei Province intends to build a large waste incineration plant, but the plant immediately adjacent to urban areas, primary school, causing local people are extremely dissatisfied with large numbers of people took to the streets yesterday to protest, requiring cessation. Wu, local people said that the day before yesterday, there are people who took to the streets in protest, the number of about 10 million people, many armed people were wounded, and even arrested, and the message messaging software WeChat not issued, the phone can not communicate.
After a netizen yesterday to protest the process of recording your videos down and accused, Bristol Mayor Zhou Wenxia to the population declared cessation of waste incineration plants, actually command the armed police beat people, grasping people, even pregnant women are left off, which makes the friends lamented not believe society is so dark.
Facebook community "revolutionary intelligence station" also shared protest videos, movie protesters were arrested and brought into the special police special police car, then was hit by opposing violence, when the man was dragged out of the police car, is sweating blood, severely.
Chinese media reports, Xiantao Renminzhengfu press office, said the municipal government after research, decided to stop the "garbage incineration power generation projects."
【仙桃市垃圾焚烧站完整字幕版】 湖北仙桃 万人游行 警察打人
===
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/1743649
〔即時新聞／綜合報導〕中國湖北仙桃市打算興建垃圾焚燒發電廠，引發當地民眾相當不滿，甚至不惜上街抗議，不過當地警方卻暴力鎮壓，當地民眾指控，武警暴力攻擊市民，連孕婦也不放過，讓這位民眾不禁感嘆，社會如此黑暗。
綜 合媒體報導，中國湖北仙桃市打算興建大型垃圾焚燒發電廠，不過發電廠位置緊鄰市區、小學，引發當地民眾極為不滿，大批民眾昨日上街抗議，要求停建。當地一 位吳姓民眾稱，前天、昨日都有人上街抗議，人數約10萬人，不少民眾遭武警打傷，甚至被抓，且通訊軟體微信的訊息無法發出去、手機也無法通訊。
一位網友把昨日抗議的過程透過影片記錄下來並指控，仙桃市長周文霞向民眾宣布停建垃圾焚燒發電廠後，竟命令武警打市民、抓民眾，甚至連孕婦也都不放過，這讓這位網友感嘆，不敢相信社會如此黑暗。
臉書社團「革命情報站」也分享抗議影片，影片中的抗議民眾遭特警抓進特警車裡，隨後竟被暴力相向，當男子被拖出警車時，已是滿頭鮮血、體無完膚。
中國媒體報導，仙桃市人民政府新聞辦公室表示，經市委市政府研究後，決定停止「生活垃圾焚燒發電項目」。
【仙桃市垃圾焚烧站完整字幕版】 湖北仙桃 万人游行 警察打人
Published on Jun 26, 2016
湖北省仙桃市，紧挨着市区建大型焚烧垃圾厂，旁边是居民楼，小学，人民反对进行游行，
这个视频是6.26中文13点前的，市长宣布停建后，放下喇叭的第二句话就是“开始打
现在大陆的媒体封锁了，没有一家出来给报道，我将视频传到这里，是希望在海外的华人们
这个视频是6.26中文13点前的，市长宣布停建后，放下喇叭的第二句话就是“开始打
现在大陆的媒体封锁了，没有一家出来给报道，我将视频传到这里，是希望在海外的华人们
===
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1742186
[Breaking News / Roundup] Japan's "Yomiuri Shimbun" quoted the Chinese official media yesterday, "Xinhua News Agency," Tsai pointed out that the Chinese side because of dissatisfaction with the government does not recognize the one-China principle, therefore, "all this will be associated with the exchange and suspended between the two sides." Japanese internet forum "2ch" in which users who have shouted "Congratulations Taiwan"!
Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ann Mountain recently pointed out that, since the 1992 consensus Taiwan aside, it will be suspended cross-strait exchanges. But many Japanese friends that this was a happy event, there are people laughing Chinese visitors to Taiwan is reduced, so now is the best time to visit Taiwan.
Related news also spread to PTT, the villagers who address him "Thank Japanese friends congratulations" This Declaration was also ridicule Chinese several times to talk about in the end is enough. Reviewed by netizens said that later can take "zero Chinese visitors" Things come when the tagline.
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1742186
〔即時新聞／綜合報導〕日本《讀賣新聞》昨日引述中國官媒《新華社》，指出中國方面因為不滿蔡英文政府不承認一中原則，所以「兩岸間的一切交流及連繫將就此中止」。日本網路論壇《2ch》的網友們紛紛對此大呼「恭喜台灣」！
國台辦發言人安峰山日前指出，由於台灣不談九二共識，所以會中止兩岸交流。不過許多日本網友卻認為這是喜事一樁，還有人笑稱去台灣的中國旅客減少了，所以現在是來台灣旅遊的最好時機。
相關消息也傳到PTT，鄉民們直呼「謝謝日本朋友的祝賀」，有人也調侃中國這種宣言到底要講幾次才夠。某位網友則表示，以後可以拿「零中國旅客」來當觀光宣傳標語了。
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160627/19671642
Mainland Chinese activist group dedicated to collecting release event twitter account "non-news" host LU Yu Yu Liting Yu and his girlfriend (Figure) January 15 lost contact, yesterday confirmed that two people have been involved in committing the authorities to "disturb the crime," the arrest, detention in Yunnan Dali detention center; analysis refers to two or nearest accident Guangdong Wukan villagers' rights events.
Chinese activist groups specifically Statistics
"Non-news" tweets No. attention this month after stopping the update. Friday Liting Yu authorities detained the father received the book, referring to Lee involved in trouble and held in Dali, Yunnan large Naju Detention Center. LU Yu Yu met with dissidents in the "north" yesterday confirmed that two people were detained; but another activist Xu Hui refers to, his last visit to the detention center revealed that the two have been transferred out. According to reports, twitter account "non-news" Statistics China specialized groups to protect their rights, concern has been launched three years; the account refers to the mainland last year, the occurrence of mass incidents nearly 30000; It refers to Lu had been repeatedly harassed by the authorities even threatened.Amnesty International issued an emergency declaration yesterday, referring to Lu and his girlfriend may have been XingJu, facing ill-treatment and torture, called on the Chinese government to immediately release the two men, rather than suppress their freedom of speech.
Radio Free Asia
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160627/19671642
內地專門蒐集發佈中國維權群體事件的twitter賬號「非新聞」，主人盧昱宇及女友李婷玉（圖）本月15日失聯，昨日確認兩人已被當局以涉犯「尋釁滋事
罪」拘捕，關押在雲南大理看守所；分析指兩人出事或與最近廣東烏坎村民維權事件有關。
專統計中國群體維權
「非新聞」推特號本月中停止更新後引起關注。上周五李婷玉的父親收到當局拘留書，指李涉尋釁滋事，關押在雲南大理大羅州看守所。與盧昱宇相識的異見人士 「北風」昨證實兩人均被關押；但另一維權人士許暉指，他昨往看守所探訪發現兩人已被轉走。據透露，twitter賬號「非新聞」專門統計中國群體維權事 件，推出三年來已受關注；該賬號指去年內地發生群體事件近3萬宗；據指盧此前已多次受當局騷擾甚至威脅。國際特赦組織昨發緊急聲明，指盧與女友可能已被刑拘，並面臨酷刑虐待，呼籲中國政府立即釋放兩人，而不是打壓他們的言論自由。
自由亞洲電台
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/news/20160628/55285956
The report to review the situation in China since 2013 to suppress human rights, covering Causeway bookstore proprietor missing on forcing suspects television "confession", detention of human rights lawyers, reporters and dissidents, and suppression of human rights and Tibet, and contains Occupy Student leader Joshua Wong and China are prohibited from entering the Canadian team Linye Where evidence. Report made 22 recommendations to the British government to conduct a comprehensive review of policy toward China. Chris Patten said in a statement renewal means a comprehensive survey and research report "China deplorable human rights record," "I am obviously what happened in Hong Kong is concerned," promoting the British Government to consider the report recommends.
Chairman Fiona Bruce criticized China's human rights over the past three years has seriously deteriorated, it may be the worst in recent years, "witnesses to us that many of the recent unprecedented development", "we believe that the British Government should re-examine ways of dealing with China, publicly and as always, the sound of human rights. " The Committee also said in a statement: "While we recognize the strategic and economic importance of China, we do not believe that the case of the British government appears serious deterioration in China's human rights situation, almost silent in public practice in everyone's interest."
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/news/20160628/55285956
英國保守黨人權委員會將發表中國人權問題報告，關注銅鑼灣書店五子失蹤事件、香港政治環境惡化等問題，促英國政府檢討對華政策。報告名為《最黑暗時刻》
（The Darkest Moment），將由前港督彭定康發表。
彭定康在聲明中，以「可悲」形容中國人權紀錄。
該報告檢討中國
2013年以來打壓人權的情況，內容涵蓋銅鑼灣書店東主失蹤、強迫嫌疑人上電視「認罪」、拘押人權律師、記者及異見人，又打壓西藏人權等，並載有佔領運動
學生領袖黃之鋒及被中國禁止入境的加拿大小組林耶凡的證供。報告向英國政府提出22項建議，要求就對華政策展開全面檢討。彭定康在聲明中續指，這份報告全 面調查及研究「中國可悲的人權紀錄」，「我對香港所發生的事情顯然感到關注」，促英國政府考慮報告建議。委員會主席Fiona Bruce批評，過去3年中國人權狀況嚴重惡化，可能是近年最惡劣，「目擊者對我們表示，近來很多發展前所未有」，「我們認為英國政府應當重新審視與中國 打交道的方式，公開並一如既往地為人權發聲」。
委員會也在聲明中表示：「儘管我們承認中國的戰略和經濟重要性，我們不認為英國政府在中國人權狀況出現嚴重 惡化的情況下，在公開場合幾乎保持沉默的作法符合大家的利益」。
http://hkjam.com/?p=1068
http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/8ad5beea-cae6-48f9-8d21-e8148dce1538
US House of Representatives Ting Taiwan membership in international organizations: an independent state on the application of this participation
US House of Representatives supported by Taiwan as an international observer for Interpol bill
Rep. Brad Sherman (Rep. Brad Sherman) also believe that the adoption of this bill is very important. He said: "Because of the daily operation of Taiwan is an independent country mode, so Taiwan should also play a role in this way in international organizations."
Senate March 8 passed the bill, a version of the Senate and House of
Representatives last November is different, this is the House vote on
the Senate version.
Mr Smith said the participation of Taiwan in favor of the reform of the International Criminal Police Organization.
He said: "Some countries are now abusing authoritarian system of
Interpol red notice, they are not against Fanzuifenzi but for political
dissidents in exile, so that these dissidents did not dare to travel
internationally for fear of being extradited persecution, imprisonment
and even death."
Taiwan is currently an observer of the World Health Assembly.
Taiwan Republic of China in 1961 to join the International Criminal Police Organization title. In 1984, the People's Republic of China joined the International Criminal Police Organization, Taiwan quit.
China opposes Taiwan's membership in international organizations.
===
http://hkjam.com/?p=1068
http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/8ad5beea-cae6-48f9-8d21-e8148dce1538
參議院在3月8日通過了這項法案，眾議院去年11月通過的一個版本和參議院有所不同，這次是眾議院就參議院的版本進行投票。
史密斯議員說臺灣的參與有利於國際刑警組織改革。他說：「一些威權國家現在濫用國際刑警組織的紅色通告系統，他們不是針對犯罪分子而是針對流亡的政治異議人士，使得這些異議人士不敢在國際上旅行害怕被引渡回國遭受迫害、監禁甚至死亡。」
臺灣目前是世界衛生大會的觀察員。
臺灣在1961年以中華民國稱號加入國際刑警組織。1984年，中華人民共和國加入國際刑警組織，臺灣退出。
中國反對臺灣加入國際組織。
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160628/19672780
Qianjiang City yesterday morning, although the rain, but people poured endless anger. Over a million people hold up an umbrella from the center of the stadium, a procession to the municipal government. They were armed with "beautiful Qianjiang, refusing best tackled at source enterprise", "resolutely resist the pesticide factory was built for the benefit of future generations", etc. banners from downtown stadium to protest against government plans to build a pesticide factory in the local area, the authorities sent police officers on alert along the way.
Municipal government halted the project
Given two days before Bristol demonstrations led to bloody clashes police, Qianjiang municipal government hastily softened demonstrations began in an hour that is announced to stop the introduction of Auguste project, "I hope the majority of people do not believe rumors, do not pass rumor, law-abiding, and jointly safeguard the overall development of Qianjiang good. "The pesticide plant named "Auguste project" is located in Qianjiang City, Ze Xie Wancun port, only 500 meters from the Yangtze River tributary Hanjiang River, August by the Russian company, Jiangsu Institute of Agrochem Limited, Hong Kong Asian farmers of crop Science Co., Ltd. invested a total investment of 525 million yuan (below approximately HK $ 612 million), scheduled to start construction next month, end of next year, the estimated annual output value of 1.5 billion yuan (about HK $ 1.75 billion).
Local people fear pesticide plant adjacent to the Han River, the water will be contaminated, endangering their health and future generations, once expressed dissatisfaction with a variety of ways, but the official ignored. See adjacent Xiantao million residents protests, succeeded in forcing authorities to suspend construction of waste incineration plants, then they have a suit, took to the streets. In recent years environmental Mainland large demonstrations occurred from time to time, compel the authorities concede.
Shanghai surging Network / Qianjiang News
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20160628/19672780
「美麗潛江，拒絕毒企」！湖北省環保之火蔓延，繼仙桃市前日十萬人大示威，抗議當局興建垃圾發電廠，鄰市潛江昨也有過萬民眾雨中撐傘上街，抗議政府擬在當
地興建農藥廠，官方在遊行開始一小時後即宣佈，叫停有關的農藥廠項目。事件未發生警民衝突。
昨日早上潛江市雖下雨，但澆不息人民怒火。過萬民眾撐 起雨傘從市中心體育館出發，遊行至市政府。他們手持「美麗潛江，拒絕毒企」、「堅決抵制建農藥廠，造福子孫萬代」等橫額，從市中心體育館出發，抗議政府計 劃在當地興建農藥廠，當局則派出警員沿途戒備。
昨日早上潛江市雖下雨，但澆不息人民怒火。過萬民眾撐 起雨傘從市中心體育館出發，遊行至市政府。他們手持「美麗潛江，拒絕毒企」、「堅決抵制建農藥廠，造福子孫萬代」等橫額，從市中心體育館出發，抗議政府計 劃在當地興建農藥廠，當局則派出警員沿途戒備。
市政府叫停項目
有鑑於前兩天仙桃大示威，引發警民流血衝突，潛江市政府急急軟化，在示威遊行開始一個小時，即對外宣佈停止引進奧古斯特項目，「希望廣大市民不信謠、不傳謠，遵紀守法，共同維護潛江良好發展大局」。這 個名為「奧古斯特項目」的農藥廠選址在潛江市澤口謝灣村，距長江支流漢江僅500米，由俄羅斯八月公司、江蘇省農用激素研究所有限公司、香港亞洲農化作物 科學有限公司投資，總投資5.25億元人民幣（下同，約6.12億港元），原定下月開建，明年底投產，預計年產值15億元（約17.5億港元）。
當地民眾擔心農藥廠毗鄰漢江，水源會受污染，危害他們及後代的健康，曾以各種方式表示不滿，但官方置之不理。看到相鄰的仙桃市十萬市民示威抗議，成功迫使當局暫停建垃圾焚燒發電廠，他們遂有樣學樣，走上街頭。最近幾年內地不時發生環保大示威事件，迫令當局退讓。
上海澎湃網/潛江新聞網
===
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160628/895688/
I add the evil picture>
Britain and China in recent years a very close relationship between the two countries called "Huangjinshidai," but the British ruling Conservative Party Human Rights Commission today will be officially released a report on China's suppression of human rights, referring to Chinese President Xi Jinping rule three years, China a marked deterioration in the human rights situation in Hong Kong, may have reached since the 1989 Tiananmen worst state, we suggest Britain should re-examine the relationship between China and the. Report, "the darkest moment: 2013-2016 suppress the human rights situation in China", will last governor Chris Patten (Chris Patten) was published, he expressed very worried about the current situation in Hong Kong, be sure to ask the British government in this "in-depth analysis China miserable human rights record, "the report into account. The report detailed Chinese detention and torture human rights lawyers; Causeway Bay Bookstore staff disappearances; detention reporters and dissidents; strengthen suppress the media and suppress freedom of expression; the suspect forced the TV "confession"; and continuing human rights in Tibet were suppressed, Hong Kong's political environment deterioration. Chinese human rights lawyer Chen Guangcheng, an umbrella movement of Hong Kong student leader Joshua Wong et al have provided testimony. British Prime Minister Cameron and Finance Minister Osborn-led, in recent years, English-friendliness of the peak, but the British "serious deterioration of the human rights situation in China to remain silent," still developing close relations with China, which the Conservative Party Human Rights Commission " deeply worried. " The report makes 22 recommendations to the British Government urges "comprehensive review" of the policy. (International Center / Dow Jones reports)
===
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160628/895688/
on June 28, 2016.
英國與中國關係近年極為密切，兩國稱之為「黃金時代」，但英國執政黨保守黨人權委員會今將正式發布一份關於中國打壓人權的報告，指中國國家主席習近平統治 3年以來，中國與香港人權狀況明顯惡化，可能已達1989年天安門事件以來最惡劣狀態，建議英國應重新審視與中國之間的關係。報告名為《最黑暗的時刻：2013-2016中國打壓人權情況》，將由末代港督彭定康（Chris Patten）發表，他表示對香港現況非常擔憂，要求英國政府一定要將這份「全面深入分析中國悲慘人權紀錄」的報告納入考量。報告詳述中國拘留和刑求維權律師；香港銅鑼灣書店人員失蹤事件；拘押記者和異議人士；加強打壓媒體及箝制言論自由；強迫嫌犯上電視「認罪」；以及西藏人權持續遭打壓、香港政治環境惡化等。中國維權律師陳光誠、香港雨傘運動學生領袖黃之鋒等人都提供證詞。在英國首相卡麥隆與財相歐斯本主導下，近年英中友好程度達高峰，但英國「對於中國人權狀況嚴重惡化保持沉默」，依舊與中國發展密切關係，保守黨人權委員會對此「深感憂慮」。這份報告向英國政府提出22項建議，敦促「全面檢討」對中政策。（國際中心／綜合外電報導）.
===
http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2016/06/28/a1273518.html
===
http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2016/06/28/a1273518.html
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160628/19672922
This sentence is not what one would suspect, both democrats, pro-establishment camp, the Hong Kong government, officials in the capital, everyone says that the rule of law. But Shajiao rule of law? Seems to have different versions. Appeared on a number of social offenses, then the chief executive officials say the challenge the rule of law. Little do they know that all countries in the world every day was breaking the law, but not the impact of these countries is the rule of law. Some low crime totalitarian states, can not be considered that the rule of law.
Many things have changed in Hong Kong, it was said, we have to recognize the incredible change. This change affects the lives of many people, not only "Wen Shi" and involves rule change, to move the goal, to the principle of fairness. Speak in the end, have shaken the foundation of the rule of law.
Law shake the foundation of reason, is the sovereign state of Hong Kong after 1997 changed from a country with the rule of law tradition and thick, into the countries do not have the rule of law.
CCP a long time talking about are written in "legal" instead of "rule of law" is talking about the most "socialist democracy and legal system." Until 1979, it was proposed to start "rule of law" or to "rule of law" argument. For the same pronunciation in Mandarin, so some scholars the "rule of law" called "knife" system ( "system" radical word from the knife), the "rule of law" referred to as "water treatment" ( "cure" word radicals from water ). "Knife" system means that the law as "Dao," that the legitimate use of tools of violence; "water cure" water symbolizes the people, "Zi" to "Jun" (regime) compared to the "boat" to the people likened to " water ', said: "water can carry a boat, can also overturn it." After nearly 20 years of debate, the Chinese Communist Party in 1997 was followed Shijiechaoliu the "rule of law" to "rule of law." Report to the 15th CPC determine "the rule of law, the Party led the people the basic strategy of governing the country."
Even changed the terms, but said "the rule of law" is the "basic strategy of the party's leadership" is equivalent in concept and implementation are still "legal" regime that is above the law, the rule of law as the tool of "rule by law "and the rule of law" rule of law "are two different things.
17th century English political philosopher John Locke is the classic statement on the rule of law: the government only with the consent of the governed, and safeguard people have natural rights to life, liberty and property, the legitimacy of its rule only; any individual can do thing, unless prohibited by law; but the government can not do anything unless permitted by law.
This principle should make it clear, nor is it easy. I accumulated decades of experience, know that no matter who said what profound truths they know, if they can not express in plain language, non-professional ordinary people can understand, then the fact that he himself is not enough transparent. I occasionally read about in the newspaper counsel Deng Weijun (David Tang) article, he can find easy to understand and express views on some of the legal affairs of fascinating characters, and often sharply. Recently he had a book of this "true rule of law", with storytelling, systematically speaking about all aspects of the rule of law, to allow readers to easily understand the meaning of the rule of law, and is linked to our lives, some of the things happening in Hong Kong, various the rule of law confusion.
Hong Kong's social stability and rock began to waver on the occasion, this book provides the knowledge actually Everyone in Hong Kong should know.
( "True rule of law" Recommended sequence)
Li Yi
Published Monday through Friday
Published Monday through Friday
===
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20160628/19672922
香港許多事情都在變，有人說，變到我們已認不得了。這種變，影響到許多人的生活，不僅「搵食」，而且涉及規則改變，涉及搬龍門，涉及公平原則。講到底，是法治根基有了動搖。
法治根基動搖的原因，是九七後香港的宗主國換了，從一個有堅厚法治傳統的國家，換成沒有法治基礎的國家。
中 共好長時間講的寫的都是「法制」而不是「法治」，講最多是「社會主義民主與法制」。直到1979年，開始有人提出要「法制」還是要「法治」的爭論。由於普 通話讀音相同，因此有學者把「法制」稱為「刀制」（「制」字的部首從刀），將「法治」稱為「水治」（「治」字的部首從水）。「刀制」意味把法當「刀把 子」，即合法使用暴力的工具；「水治」的水象徵人民，《荀子》以「君」（政權）比作「舟」，以人民比作「水」，指出：「水能載舟，亦能覆舟」。經過近20 年爭論，到1997年中共才跟從世界潮流將「法制」改為「法治」。中共黨的十五大報告，確定「依法治國，是黨領導人民治理國家的基本方略」。
即使改了用語，但說「依法治國」是「黨領導的基本方略」，就等於在觀念和實行上仍然是「法制」，即政權凌駕於法律之上、以法律為統治工具的「rule by law」，與法治的「rule of law」是兩回事。
17世紀英國政治哲學家John Locke關於法治的經典論述是：政府只有在取得被統治者的同意，並且保障人民擁有生命、自由和財產的自然權利時，其統治才有正當性；個人可以做任何事情，除非法律禁止；但政府不能做任何事情，除非法律許可。
要 把這個原則講清楚，也不是容易的事。我積數十年經驗，知道無論誰說自己懂得甚麼深奧的大道理，如果不能用通俗的、非專業的普通人都能了解的語言表達，那麼 其實他自己也不夠通透。我偶而在報上讀到大律師鄧偉鈞（David Tang）的文章，發覺他能用通俗易懂而且引人入勝的文字表達對一些時事的法律意見，而且往往一針見血。最近他出了本《真假法治》的新書，用說故事的方 式，有系統地講有關法治的方方面面，讓讀者輕易地明白何謂法治，並且聯繫到我們的生活，香港發生的一些事，種種對法治的混淆。
在香港的社會安定磐石開始動搖之際，這本書提供的知識其實是每個香港人都應該了解的。
（《真假法治》推薦序）
李怡
周一至周五刊出
周一至周五刊出
===
*-Update[ 27/06-2016]- From Our Chivalrous Brother "YURI" ,, ''★Polish Cyber Army★ '' ,, blackspy' ,, ''The Hacker News ,, ''TEAM CYMRU'' #cybersecurity share much more..!
===
#wtf ,, #lmf
,,
#OpHongKong ,, #OpHongKongDAB ,, #OpHKRealEstateCunningMerchants ,,
#OpChina ,, #OpLeungChunYing ,,
#OpXiJinPing ,,
#OpNaziTrump ,, #OpIRAN
,, #OpNKorean ,,
#OpISIS ,,
#Op_Tibet #freetibet #savetibet
,,
---------------
#saveSyria ,, #saveTurkey
,, #saveJapan ,, #saveUkraine ,, #GodBlessCanada ,,
#GodBlessTaiwan ,, GodBlessParis
,, #GlodBlessAmerican ,,
#Hastings
,, #HumanRight ,,
#AnonFamily .
===Meloy===FOLLOW FOLLOW===>/
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
沒有留言:
張貼留言